1887
Volume 2022, Issue 1
  • EISSN: 2223-506X

Abstract

Nanobiotechnology has gained increasing traction in biomedical research and manufacturing in recent years. Benefiting from tools and methods developed in other nanophase engineering and visualization disciplines, this branch of biological engineering encompasses the worlds of biomolecular science, drug development, and bioelectronic device fabrication. A key challenge in observation and manipulation at the nanoscale is that smaller dimensions lead to weaker signals. Numerous technologies have been developed to detect weak signals and integrate them to create holistic views of biomedical phenomena. This perspective discusses some of these modern nanobiotechnologies and links them to fundamental principles in lithography, patterning, visualization, inspection, and signal detection - all of which emerged from electrical engineering, physics, and materials science.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2022.6
2022-09-19
2022-10-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/connect/2022/1/connect.2022.6.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2022.6&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hedrich R, Neher E. Venus flytrap: How an excitable, carnivorous plant works. Trends in Plant Science. 2018;23:220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.12.004.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dijk D-J. EEG slow waves and sleep spindles: Windows on the sleeping brain. Behavioural Brain Research. 1995;69:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(95)00007-g.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ujma PP, Sandor P, Szakadat S, Gombos F, Bodizs R. Sleep spindles and intelligence in early childhood-developmental and trait-dependent aspects. Developmental Psychology. 2016;52:2118–2129. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000233.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Horikawa T, Kamitani Y. Hierarchical neural representation of dreamed objects revealed by brain decoding with deep neural network features. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2017;11:4.https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00004.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Marhl U, Jodko-Władzinska A, Brühl R, Sander T, Jazbinšek V. Transforming and comparing data between standard SQUID and OPM-MEG systems. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0262669. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262669.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dietrich JS. Tiny tale gets grand. Engineering & Science. 1986;49:24–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Watanabe M, Haviland DB. Coulomb blockade and coherent single-cooper-pair tunneling in single Josephson junctions. Physical Review Letters. 2001;86:5120–5123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5120.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dastjerdy E, Ghayour R, Sarvari H. Simulation and analysis of the frequency performance of a new silicon nanowire MOSFET structure. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 2012;45:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2012.07.007.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hisamoto D, Lee WC, Kedzierski J, Takeuchi H, Asano K, Kuo C, et al. FinFET – a self-aligned double-gate MOSFET scalable to 20 nm. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2000;47:2320–2325. https://doi.org/10.1109/16.887014.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Isakovic J, Dobbs-Dixon I, Chaudhury D, Mitrecic D. Modeling of inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields in the nervous system: A novel paradigm in understanding cell interactions, disease etiology and therapy. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:12909.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31054-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Klein M, Kandel ER. Presynaptic modulation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ current: Mechanism for behavioral sensitization in Aplysia californica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1978;75:3512–3516. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.75.7.3512.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Burgess N. The 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: A spatial model for cognitive neuroscience. Neuron. 2014;84:1120–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.009.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Torretti F, Sheil J, Schupp R, Basko MM, BayraktarM, Meijer RA, et al. Prominent radiative contributions from multiply-excited states in laser-produced tin plasma for nanolithography. Nature Communications. 2020;11:2334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15678-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brinkerhoff H, Kang ASW, Liu J, Aksimentiev A, Dekker C. Multiple rereads of single proteins at single-amino acid resolution using nanopores. Science. 2021;374:1509–1513. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4381.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sagermann M, Gay L, Matthews BW. Long-distance conformational changes in a protein engineered by modulated sequence duplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:9191–9195. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633549100.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yousef MS, Baase WA, Matthews BW. Use of sequence duplication to engineer a ligand-triggered, long-distance molecular switch in T4 lysozyme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101:11583–11586. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404482101.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yousef MS, Bischoff N, Dyer CM, Baase WA, Matthews BW. Guanidinium derivatives bind preferentially and trigger long-distance conformational changes in an engineered T4 lysozyme. Protein Science. 2006;15:853–861. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.052020606.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Biggers L, Elhabashy H, Ackad E, Yousef MS. Molecular dynamics simulations of an engineered T4 lysozyme exclude helix to sheet transition, and provide insights into long distance, intra-protein switchable motion. Protein Science. 2020;29:542–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3780.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jost N, Christ T, Magyar J. New strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14:926.https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090926.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhai K, Liskova A, Kubatka P, Busselberg D. Calcium entry through TRPV1: A potential target for the regulation of proliferation and apoptosis in cancerous and healthy cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:4177.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21114177.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Clarke J, Koch R.H. The impact of high-temperature superconductivity on SQUID magnetometers. Science. 1988;242:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.242.4876.217.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Callaway, E. Revolutionary cryo-EM is taking over structural biology. Nature. 2020;578:201.https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00341-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fan X, Cao D, Kong L, Zhang X. Cryo-EM analysis of the post-fusion structure of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein. Nature Communications. 2020;11:3618.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17371-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Josselyn SA, Köhler S, Frankland PW. Finding the engram. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2015;16:521–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn4000.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee D, Hyun JH, Jung K, Hannan P, Kwon HB. A calcium- and light-gated switch to induce gene expression in activated neurons. Nature Biotechnology. 2017;35:858–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3902.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2022.6
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2022.6
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error