1887
Volume 2012, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2223-506X

Abstract

Abstract

The study of phytoplankton diversity and its seasonal variation was carried out by sampling water taken from the Santragachi Lake, of West Bengal between November 2009 and July 2010. Various physico-chemical variables were recorded and the correlation of this with phytoplankton density was established using Canonical Correspondence Analysis. This showed that the density of phytoplankton was higher when temperature and nutrients were increased. A total of 29 phytoplankton taxa belonging to Chlorophyta (10), Cyanobacteria (8), Charophyta (5), Bacillariophyta (4), and Euglenozoa (2) were recorded from nine samples taken within the study period. Chlorophyta species dominated mostly in variety and percentage composition while Euglenozoa species representatives had the least expression. Bio-indication showed a low diverse community in the monsoon period with better water quality than in pre- and post-monsoon seasons. Various diversity indices (Shannon–Wiener diversity index, Gleason species richness index, Pielou evenness index, and Naughton dominance index) were used to establish the seasonal variation of phytoplankton. The Shannon–Wiener diversity index was most useful in indicating the trophic status of the water as well as the pollution status, which in this case, depicted a moderate level of pollution of this lake.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3
2012-05-08
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/connect/2012/1/connect.2012.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. [1]. Veereshakumar , NS., , & Homani , SP.   ( 2006; ). Algalbiodiversity in freshwater and related to physico-chemical factors. . Nat Environ PollutTechnol , 5: , 37– 40 .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]. Kartha , SD., , & Rao , KS.   ( 1992; ). Environmental status of Gandhi sagar reservoir. . Fish Technol Soc India , 29: , 14– 20 .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]. Ravikumar , M., , Manjappa , S., , Kiran , BR., , & Puttaiah , ET.   ( 2006; ). Phytoplankton periodicity in relation to abiotic factors in Kulahallitank near Harapanahalli, Karnataka. . Nat Environ Pollut Technol , 5: , 157– 161 .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]. Nural Alom , M., , & Zaman , M.   ( 2006; ). Physico-chemical characteristics of a large lentic water body in Rajshahi,Bangladesh. . Nat Environ Pollut Technol , 5: ( 3 ), 441– 446 .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]. Tiwari , D., , & Shukla , M.   ( 2007; ). Algal biodiversity and trophic status of some temporary water bodies ofKampur. . Nat Environ Pollut Technol , 6: , 85– 90 .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]. Sridhar , R., , Thangaradjou , T., , Senthil Kumar , S., , & Kannan , L.   ( 2006; ). Water quality and phytoplankton characteristics in the Palk Bay, southeastcoast of India. . J Environ Biol , 27: , 561– 566 .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]. Goldman , CR., , & Horne , AJ.   ( 1983; ). Limnology . McGraw-Hill Inc; , New York, N.Y: .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]. Paramasivan , M., , & Sreenivasan , A.   ( 1981; ). Changes in algal flora due to pollution in Cauvery river. . Indian J EnvironHealth , 23: , 222– 238 .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]. Mani , P., , & Krishnamurthy , K.   ( 1989; ). Variation of phytoplankton in a tropical estuary (Vellar Estuary, Bay ofBengal, India). . Int Revre Ges Hydrobiol , 74: ( 1 ), 109– 115 .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]. Umamaheswara Rao , M., , & Sarojini , Y.   ( 1992; ). Composition, abundance and vertical distribution of phytoplankton and fungioff Krishna and Godavari river mouths, eastcoast of India. . India J Mar Sci , 21: ( 2 ), 128– 132 .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]. Palmer, CM. Algae and water pollution, U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Cincinnati, Ohio. EPA-600/9-77-036. 1977.
  12. [12]. Shubert, LE Algae as ecological indicators, Department of Biology,University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, USA, 1984.
  13. [13]. Vaulot , D., , & Phytoplankton , .   ( 2001; ). Encyclopedia of Life Sciences . Nature Publishing Group; , London: . http://www.els.net
    [Google Scholar]
  14. [14]. Forsberg , C..   ( 1982; ). Limnological research can improve and reduce the cost of monitoring andcontrol of water quality. . Hydrobiol , 86: , 143– 146 .
    [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]. Gaikwad , SR., , Tarot , SR., , & Chavan , TP.   ( 2004; ). Diversity of Phytoplankton and zooplankton with respect to pollution statusof river Tapi in North Maharastra region. . J Curr Sci , 5: , 749– 754 .
    [Google Scholar]
  16. [16]. Devassy , VP., , & Goss , JI.   ( 1988; ). Phytoplankton community structure and succession in tropical estuarinecomplex (Central West Cost of India). . Estuarine, Costal Shelf Sci , 27: , 671– 685 .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. [17]. Trivedy , RK., , & Goel , PK.   ( 1984; ). Chemical and Biological Methods for Water Pollution Studies . Environm.Pub; , Karad, India: .
    [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]. Michael , P.   ( 1984; ). Ecological Methods for Field and Laboratory Investigations . TataMcGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd; , New Delhi, India: .
    [Google Scholar]
  19. [19]. APHA, AWWA and WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water andwastewater. 21 st edition. Published jointly by the American Public HealthAssociation, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation,2005.
  20. [20]. Smith , GM.   ( 1950; ). The Freshwater Algae of the United States . McGraw Hill; , New York, USA: .
    [Google Scholar]
  21. [21]. Prescott , GW.   ( 1962; ). Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area . Brown Company Publishers; , Dubuque, Iowa: .
    [Google Scholar]
  22. [22]. Desikachary , TV.   ( 1959; ). Cyanophyta. . Indian Council of Agricultural Research . New Delhi: .
    [Google Scholar]
  23. [23]. Turner , WB.   ( 1982; ). The freshwater algae of East India. . K Svenska Vetensk Akad Handle , 25: ( 5 ), 1– 187 .
    [Google Scholar]
  24. [24]. Anand , N.   ( 1998; ). Indian Freshwater Microalgae . Bishen Singh Mahendrapal Singh Publishers;
    [Google Scholar]
  25. [25]. Cox , EJ.   ( 1996; ). Identification of Freshwater Diatom Live Material . Chapman and Hall; , London: .
    [Google Scholar]
  26. [26]. Guiry , MD., , & Guiry , GM.   ( 2011; ). AlgaeBase. . World-wide Electronic Publication, Galway . National Universityof Ireland Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  27. [27]. Barinova, SS, Medvedeva, LA, & Anissimova, OV Diversity of algalindicators in environmental assessment, Tel Aviv: Pilies Studio, 2006, In Russian. http://herba.msu.ru/algae/materials/book/bioind/title.html.
  28. [28]. Ter Braak , CJF., , & Van Dam , H.   ( 1989; ). Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods. . Hydrobiologia , 178: , 209– 223 .
    [Google Scholar]
  29. [29]. Van Dam , H., , Martens , A., , & Sinkeldam , J.   ( 1994; ). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatomsfrom the Netherlands. . Netherlands Journal Aquatic Ecology , 28: ( 1 ), 117– 133 .
    [Google Scholar]
  30. [30]. Odum , EP.   ( 1969; ). The strategy of ecosystem development. . Science , 164: , 262– 270 .
    [Google Scholar]
  31. [31]. Gleason , HA.   ( 1922; ). On the relation between species and area. . Ecology , 3: , 156– 162 .
    [Google Scholar]
  32. [32]. Pielou , EC.   ( 1967; ). The use of information theory in the study of the diversity of biologicalpollutions, Proc. 5th Berkeley symp. . Math Stat Prob , 4: , 163– 177 .
    [Google Scholar]
  33. [33]. McNaughton , SJ.   ( 1967; ). Relationships among functional properties of Californian grassland. . Nature , 216: ( 5111 ), 168– 169 .
    [Google Scholar]
  34. [34]. Ignatiades , L., , & Mimicos , N.   ( 1977; ). Ecological responses of phytoplankton on chronic oil pollution. . EnvironPollut , 13: , 109– 117 .
    [Google Scholar]
  35. [35]. ter Braak , CJF., , & Šmilauer , P.   ( 2002; ). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide:Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5) . Microcomputer PowerPress; , Ithaca: .
    [Google Scholar]
  36. [36]. ter Braak , CJF.   ( 1990; ). Interpreting canonical correlation analysis through biplots of structuralcorrelations and weights. . Psychometrica , 55: , 519– 531 .
    [Google Scholar]
  37. [37]. ter Braak , CJF.   ( 1987; ). The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonicalcorrespondence analysis. . Vegetatio , 69: , 69– 77 .
    [Google Scholar]
  38. [38]. Hustedt , F.   ( 1938–1939; ). Systematisch und ökologische Untersuchungen über die Diatomeenfloravon Java, Bali und Sumatra. . Arch Hydrobiol Suppl , 15: , 131– 177 . 393–506, 638–790; 16 :1–155, 274–394
    [Google Scholar]
  39. [39]. Hustedt , F.   ( 1957; ). Die Diatomeenflora des Flußsystems der Weser im Gebiet der HansestadtBremen. . Abhandl Naturw Ver Bremen , 34: , 181– 440 .
    [Google Scholar]
  40. [40]. Watanabe , T., , Asai , K., , & Houki , A.   ( 1986; ). Numerical estimation to organic pollution of flowing water by using theepilithic diatom assemblage—Diatom Assemblage Index (DAIpo). . Sci Total Environ , 55: , 209– 218 .
    [Google Scholar]
  41. [41]. Sládeèek , V.   ( 1986; ). Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. . Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol , 14: , 555– 566 .
    [Google Scholar]
  42. [42]. European Parliament, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and ofthe Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of waterpolicy, 2000; OJL 327 : 1–72.
  43. [43]. Maeda , H., , Kawai , A., , & Tilzes , M.   ( 1992; ). The water bloom of cyanobacteiral picoplankton in lake Biwa, Japan. . Hydrobiologia , 248: , 93– 103 .
    [Google Scholar]
  44. [44]. Bailey-Watts , AE.   ( 1982; ). The composition and abundance of phytoplankton in Loch Leven (Scotland)1977–1979 and a comparison with succession in earlier years. . Int Rev Ges HydrobiolHydrogr , 67: , 1– 25 .
    [Google Scholar]
  45. [45]. Scheffer , M.   ( 1998; ). Ecology of Shallow Lakes . Chapman and Hall; , London: .
    [Google Scholar]
  46. [46]. Riegman , R., , Colijn , F., , Malschert , JEP., , Hoosterhuis , HT., , & Codee , GC.   ( 1990; ). Assessment of growth rate limiting nutrients in the North sea by the use ofnutrient uptake kinetics. . Neth J Sea Res , 26: ( 1 ), 53– 60 .
    [Google Scholar]
  47. [47]. El-Gindy , AAH., , & Dorham , MM.   ( 1992; ). Interactions of phytoplankton chlorophyll and physico-chemical factors inArabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman during summer. . Indian J Mar Sci , 21: ( 1 ), 233– 306 .
    [Google Scholar]
  48. [48]. Melack , JM.   ( 1979; ). Temporal variability of phytoplankton in tropical lakes. . Oecologia , 44: , l–7
    [Google Scholar]
  49. [49]. Dhande , JS., , & Jawale , AK.   ( 2011; ). Genus- Homoeothrix (Thuret) Kirchner (Cyanophyceae) from Hartala Lake,Maharashtra. . Journal of Experimental Sciences , 2: ( 4 ), 07– 08 .
    [Google Scholar]
  50. [50]. Hubble , DS., , & Harper , DM.   ( 2002; ). Nutrient control of phytoplankton production in Lake Naivasha, Kenya. . Hydrobiologia , 488: , 99– 105 .
    [Google Scholar]
  51. [51]. Stockner , JG., , & Shortreed , KS.   ( 1988; ). Response of Anabaena and Synechococcus to manipulation of nitrogen:phosphorus ration in a lake fertilization experiment. . Limnol Oceanogr , 33: , 1348– 1361 .
    [Google Scholar]
  52. [52]. Johnson , MG., , & Brinkhurst , RO.   ( 1971; ). Associations and Species Diversity in Benthic Macroinvertebrates of Bayof Quinte and Lake Ontario. . J Fish Res Board Canada , 28: ( 11 ), 1683– 1697 .
    [Google Scholar]
  53. [53]. Patrick , R.   ( 1967; ). The effect of invasion rate, species pool and size of area on the structure ofdiatom community. . Proc Nat Acad Sci , 58: , 133– 142 .
    [Google Scholar]
  54. [54]. Wilham , JL., , & Dorris , TC.   ( 1968; ). Biological parameters for water quality criteria. . Bioscience , 18: , 447– 481 .
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CCA , Diversity , Phytoplankton , Santragachi Lake, India and Seasonal variation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error