oa Emerging roles and activities of health sciences librarians: A literature review (2004–2014)

References

1. Allee NJ, Blumenthal J, Jordan K, Lalla N, Lauseng D, Rana G, Saylor K, Song J. One institution's experience in transforming the health sciences library of the future. Med Ref Serv Q. 2014; 33:1:1–16.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cox AM, Corrall S. Evolving academic library specialties. J Am Soc Information Sci Technol. 2013; 64:8:1526–1542.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Federer L. The librarian as research informationist: A case study. J Med Library Assoc. 2013; 101:4:298–302.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kenney AR. Leveraging the Liaison Model. From Defining 21st Century Research Libraries to Implementing 21st Century Research Universities. [Online]. New York: Ithaka 2014;. [http://www.sr.ithaka.org/sites/default/files/files/SR_BriefingPaper_Kenney_20140322]. Accessed 13 November 2015.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lynn VA, Fitzsimmons M, Robinson CK. Special report: Symposium on transformational change in health sciences libraries: Space, collections, and roles. J Med Library Assoc. 2011; 99:1:82–87.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Whately KM. New roles of liaison librarians: A liaison's perspective. Research Library Issues: A Bimonthly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC. 2009; 265::29–32.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Reilly SK. Rounding up the data: Libraries pushing new frontiers. Learn Publ. 2014; 27:5:33–34.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cox AM, Pinfield S. Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2013; June 28.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carlson J. Demystifying the data interview: Developing a foundation for reference librarians to talk with researchers about their data. Reference Services Review. 2012; 40:1:7–23.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Whitmore SC, Grefsheim SF, Rankin JA. Informationist programme in support of biomedical research: A programme description and preliminary findings of an evaluation. Health Info Libr J. 2008; 25:2:135–141.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Sathe NA, Williams A. Evolution of a mature clinical informationist model. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12::249–255.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Featherstone RM. The disaster information specialist: An emerging role for health librarians. J Libr Admin. 2012; 52:8:731–753.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Reynolds P, Tamanaha I. Disaster information specialist pilot project: NLM/DIMRC. Med Ref Serv Q. 2010; 29:4:394–404.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cragin MH, Heidorn PB, Palmer CL, Smith LC. An educational program on data curation. 2007 STS Conference Poster Session. Chicago: American Library Association 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Heidorn PB. The emerging role of libraries in data curation and E-science. J Libr Adm. 2011; 51:7–8:662–672.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bracke MS. Emerging data curation roles for librarians: A case study of agricultural data. J Agric Food Info. 2011; 12:1:65–74.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kouper I. CLIR/DLF digital curation postdoctoral fellowship – the hybrid role of data curator. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol (Online). 2013; 39:2:46–47.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Radniecki T. Study on emerging technologies librarians: How a new library position and its competencies are evolving to meet the technology and information needs of libraries and their patrons. IFLA WLIC 2013 – Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities. Singapore: IFLA 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cooper D, Crum JA. New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: A systematic review, 1990–2012. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013; 101:4:268–277.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Farrell AM, Mayer SH, Rethlefsen ML. Teaching Web 2.0 beyond the library: Adventures in social media, the class. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011; 30:3:233–244.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Harris MR. The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: A case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005; 93:1:81–87.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dudden RF, Protzko SL. The systematic review team: Contributions of the health sciences librarian. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011; 30:3:301–315.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Heimlich SL. New and emerging roles for medical librarians. J Hosp Librarian. 2014; 14:1:24–32.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Beverley CA, Booth A, Bath PA. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: A health information case study. Health Info Libr J. 2003; 20:2:65–74.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jaguszewski JM, Williams K. Transforming liaison roles in research libraries. New Roles for New Times. Washington D.C. ACRL 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ferree N, Schaefer N, Butson LC, Tennant MR. Liaison librarian tiers: Levels of service. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2009; 97:2:145–148. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.015.27 .
    [Google Scholar]
27. Cooper ID. Is the informationist a new role? A logic model analysis. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011; 99:3:189–192.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rankin JA, Grefsheim SF, Canto CC. The emerging informationist specialty: A systematic review of the literature. J Med Libr Assoc. 2008; 96:3:194–206.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Guessferd M. The clinical librarian/informationist: Past, present, future. J Hosp Librarian. 2006; 6:2:65–73.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lyon J, Giuse NB, Williams A, Koonce T, Walden R. A model for training the new bioinformationist. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004; 92:2:188–195.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Australian National Data Service. ANDS Guides: Information Specialists and Data Librarians [Online]. Australia: ANDS 2015;. [http://ands.org.au/guides/dmframework/dmskills-information.html]. Accessed 12 September 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Krier L, Strasser CA. Data Management for Libraries: A LITA Guide. Chicago: ALA TechSource 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Tenopir C, Sandusky RJ, Allard S, Birch B. Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2014; 36:2:84–90.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Cox AM, Pinfield S. Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. J Librarian Inf Sci. 2014; 46:4:299–316.
    [Google Scholar]
35. National Academy of Sciences. Standards for Systematic Reviews. [Online]. [http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews/Standards.aspx?page = 2]. Accessed 13 November 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Medical Library Association. Senior informationist, systematic review. MLA Blog. 2011; [Online]. [https://academicjobs.columbia.edu/applicants/Central?quickFind = 61701 2015]. (25 November 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Carlson J, Kneale R. Embedded librarianship in the research context: Navigating new waters. Coll Res Libr News. 2011; 72:3:167–170.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Shumaker D, Talley M. Models of embedded librarianship: A research summary. Inf Outlook. 2010; 14:1:26–35.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pratt GF. Liaison services for a remotely located biotechnology research center. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991; 79:4:394–401.
    [Google Scholar]
40. E-Science Portal for New England Librarians. Embedded librarian/informationist. 2015;, [Online]. [http://esciencelibrary.umassmed.edu/professional-educ/escience-thesaurus/embedded-librarian-informationist]. Accessed 13 November 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Shank JD. The blended librarian: A job announcement analysis of the newly emerging position of instructional design librarian. Coll Res Libr. 2006; 67:6:514–524.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Groeling J, Boyd K. The impact of distance education on libraries. Theol Librarian. 2009; 2:1:35–44.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Association of College & Research Libraries. Standards for distance learning library services. 2008;, [Online]. American Library Association. [http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/guidelinesdistancelearning]. Accessed 10 December 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008; 299:2:211–213. doi:10.1001/jama.2007.26 .
    [Google Scholar]
45. Seeger NC. 6 – Who needs a health librarian? Ethical reference transactions in the consumer health library. In: Smith CAKeselman A, eds. Meeting Health Information Needs Outside of Healthcare. Amsterdam: Chandos Publishing 2015;:117–142.
    [Google Scholar]
46. National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Professional Development for Consumer Health [Online]. Maryland: National Library of Medicine 2015;. [https://nnlm.gov/outreach/consumer/profdevelopment.html]. Accessed 20 December 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Vassilakaki E, Moniarou-Papaconstantinou V. A systematic literature review informing library and information professionals’ emerging roles. New Libr World. 2015; 116:1/2:37–66.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Eldredge JD. The librarian as tutor/facilitator in a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. Ref Serv Rev. 2004; 32:1:54–59.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Medical Library Association. Deciphering Medspeak [Online]. Chicago: MLA 2007;. [http://www.mlanet.org/resources/medspeak/]. Accessed 12 September 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Starr S. Improving instruction in medical libraries: The research agenda. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012; 100:4:236–238.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Brodman E. Medical Librarianship, a mid-century survey: A symposium. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1957; 45:4:480.
    [Google Scholar]