It is widely known that nearly 50% of engineering students either switch majors or drop out within the first couple of semesters upon enrollment. Research has revealed that a combination of poor teaching and mentoring, difficulty of the curriculum, and lack of belonging are among the reasons for high attrition.

Over the years, educators have developed a wide range of techniques to address the attrition issues mentioned above. There have been many teaching and learning centers established across campuses to improve pedagogies to help enhance student learning. In addition, freshman and sophomore curricula have been revamped to incorporate more design projects, problem-based learning (PBL), etc. Better mentoring and engaging students in engineering activities and research have also helped students feel they belong in engineering.

All along, one of the challenges has been to introduce new courses and additional units in an already jam-packed curriculum. The authors have been incorporating failure case studies as an integral component of existing engineering and construction management courses to provide students a better insight regarding their chosen field and future profession. Student groups form forensic engineering or consulting companies; investigate technical and ethical aspects of a prominent engineering or construction failure; prepare technical reports, and deliver PowerPoint slide presentations in class. Myriad assessments have revealed that students become more conscientious about the subject at hand; working in teams gives them the feeling of belonging; a closer interaction is established between the instructor and students, and students gain a better perspective of real life projects. In addition, the venue provides an opportunity to teach ethics via case studies. The details of case studies, on failure to enhance student learning and retention and inculcating professional ethics as part of these case studies, will constitute the crux of our paper.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Matthews M . “Keeping Students in Engineering: A Research-to-Practice Brief,” American Society of Engineering Education, ASEE, Editorial: www.asee.org, February 25, 2012.
  2. Felder Richard. et al.. A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention: IV. Instructional Methods and Students Responses to Them. Journal of Engineering Education. 1995; 82:1:1521.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. National Science Board (NSB). “Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education,” National Science Foundation Document Number NSB07122, November 19, 2007.
  4. Petroski H . “Look First to Failure,” Harvard Business Review, October 2004.
  5. ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology), Inc., Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Evaluations During the 204-2015 Accreditation Cycle, Baltimore, Maryland, 2013.
  6. ACCE (American Council for Construction Education), Standards and Criteria for Accreditation of Postsecondary Construction Education Degree Programs, San Antonio, Texas, 2013.
  7. Meador G . “Failure by Design.” Source: http://www.bps-ok.org/physics/faildes/failure_by_design.pdf, Accessed on 10 September 2014.
  8. Delatte N. Using Failure Case Studies in Civil Engineering Education. 2000;430440, in Forensic Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Adekoya A, Patel J. “The Use of Failure Case Studies to Enhance Students’ Understanding of Structural Behavior and Ethics,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, San Juan, PR, 23–28 July 2006.
  10. Petroski H. Success Through Failure: The Paradox of Design. Princeton University Press 2008:p.256.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Henshaw R . “Desirable Attributes for Professional Engineers,” In: Agnew JB & Creswell C. eds. Broadening Horizons of Engineering Education, 3rd Annual Conference of Australian Association for Engineering Education, 15-18 December 1991, University of Adelaide, pp. 199–204.
  12. Lang JD, Cruise S, McVey FD, McMasters J. Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers. Journal of Engineering Education. 1999;4351.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mills JE, Treagust DF. Engineering Education – Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer? Australian Journal of Engineering Education. 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. NAE (National Academy of Engineering). Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 2004:p.119.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NAE (National Academy of Engineering). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington DC: The National Academies Press 2005:p.209.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Delatte N, Gisemba-Bagaka's J, Roberts MW, Atadero RA, Zoghi M, Johnson P, Cavalline TL, Thompson MK. “Results from Implementation and Assessment of Case Studies in the Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23–26, 2013.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error