References

1. [1]. Roubik   DW. . Competitive interactions between neotropical pollinators and africanized honeybees. . Science . 1978; ;201: : 1030– – 1032 .
   [Google Scholar]
2. [2]. Hazen   RM. . Curve-fitting. . Science . 1978; ;202: : 823.
   [Google Scholar]
3. [3]. Stanbrook   MB., , Austin   PC., and Redelmeier   DA. . Acronym-named randomized trials in medicine–the ART in medicine study. . TheNew England Journal of Medicine . 2006; ;355: : 101– – 102 .
   [Google Scholar]
4. [4]. Diamond   GA. . Right answer, wrong question: on the clinical relevance of the cardiovascularhistory. . Circulation . 2011; ;124: : 2377– – 2379 .
   [Google Scholar]
5. [5]. Cheng   VY., , Berman   DS., , Rozanski   A., , Dunning   AM., , Achenbach   S., , Al-Mallah   M., , Budoff   MJ., , Cademartiri   F., , Callister   TQ., , Chang   HJ., , Chinnaiyan   K., , Chow   BJ., , Delago   A., , Gomez   M., , Hadamitzky   M., , Hausleiter   J., , Karlsberg   RP., , Kaufmann   P., , Lin   FY., , Maffei   E., , Raff   GL., , Villines   TC., , Shaw   LJ., and Min   JK. . Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach forestimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery diseasein patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from themultinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: aninternational multicenter registry (CONFIRM). . Circulation . 2011; ;124: : 2423– – 2432 .
   [Google Scholar]
6. [6]. Horton   R. . Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers. . Lancet . 1996; ;347: : 984– – 985 .
   [Google Scholar]
7. [7]. Blackstone   EH. . Comparing apples and oranges. . The Journal of Thoracic and CardiovascularSurgery . 2002; ;123: : 8– – 15 .
   [Google Scholar]
8. [8]. Mokhles   MM., , Kortke   H., , Stierle   U., , Wagner   O., , Charitos   EI., , Bogers   AJ., , Gummert   J., , Sievers   HH., and Takkenberg   JJ. . Survival comparison of the Ross procedure and mechanical valve replacement withoptimal self-management anticoagulation therapy: propensity-matched cohort study. . Circulation . 2011; ;123: : 31– – 38 .
   [Google Scholar]
9. [9]. Takkenberg   JJ., , Puvimanasinghe   JP., and Grunkemeier   GL. . Simulation models to predict outcome after aortic valve replacement. . The Annals ofThoracic Surgery . 2003; ;75: : 1372– – 1376 .
   [Google Scholar]
10. [10]. van Geldorp   MW., , Eric Jamieson   WR., , Kappetein   AP., , Ye   J., , Fradet   GJ., , Eijkemans   MJ., , Grunkemeier   GL., , Bogers   AJ., and Takkenberg   JJ. . Patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biologicalprosthesis: weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk. . The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery . 2009; ;137: : 881– – 886 . 886e881-885 .
    [Google Scholar]
11. [11]. Carabello   B. . Assessment of the patient with valvular heart disease: an integrativeapproach. . Aswan Heart Centre: Science and Practice Series . 2011; ;15: : http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/ahcsps.2011.15 .
    [Google Scholar]
12. [12]. de Leval   M. . Reflections on outcome analyses: introducing the concept ofnear misses. . Aswan Heart Centre: Science and Practice Series . 2011; ;12: : http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/ahcsps.2011.12 .
    [Google Scholar]
13. [13]. Klieverik   LMA., , Noorlander   M., , Takkenberg   JJM., , Kappetein   P., , Bekkers   JA., , van Herwerden   LA., and Bogers   AJJC. . Outcome after aortic valve replacement in young adults: is patient profile moreimportant than prosthesis type?.   Journal of Heart Valve Disease . 2006; ;15: : 4.
    [Google Scholar]