1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Qatar Medical Journal
  4. Volume 2002, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2002, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is a viable alternative with putative advantages over the same procedure performed via laparotomy for those individuals requiring uterine extirpation without indication for cervical removal. The laparoscopic approach to this procedure provides even lower morbidity and therefore can enhance clinical outcomes. The risk of subsequent cervical cancer, an uncommon and largely preventable occurrence, may not outweigh the benefits of supracervical hysterectomy, which should be offered as an option for selected patients. Therefore it seems likely that, in a woman with a history of regular screening with negative cytology, there will be a minimal risk of future malignant change in a cervical remnant, even this risk would be reduced to near zero if the transition zone and part or all of the endocervical cana were to be removed.

© 2002 Abdel Monem et al., licensee Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2002.2.8
2002-11-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Freund WA. Bemerkungen zu meiner methode der uterusextirpation. Zbl’. Gynakol. 1878; 2::497–500.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Semm K. Hysterectomy via Laparotomy or Pelviscopy. A new Cash method without culpotomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheikunde. 1991; 51::996–1003.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Falcone T, Fidela MR, Mascha E. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180:4:955–962.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Harkki R, Turki T, Sjoberg J, Tiitinen A:. Safety aspects of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80:5:383–391.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Sills ES, Saini J, Applegate MS, McGee M, Gretz HF. Supracervical and total abdominal hysterectomy trends in New York State 1990-1996. J Urb Health. 1998; 75:4:903–910.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Saraiya M, Nancy CL, Blackman D, Smith Mj, Morrow B, McKenna MA. Self reported Papanicolaou smears and hysterectomies among women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98:2:269–278.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones DED, Shackelford DP, Brame RG. Supracervical hysterectomy: Back to the future? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180:3 Pt.I:513–515.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Lyons TL. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Baill Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 11:1:167–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Has soon MH. Cervical removal at hysterectomy for benign disease: risks and benefits. J Reprod Med. 1993; 38::781–790.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ewies AA, Olah KS. Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy: A surgical advance or a backward step? Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 107::1376–1379.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lyons TL. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy: A comparison of morbidity and mortality results with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Reprod Med. 1993; 36::763–767.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kikklu P. Supravaginal uterine amputation versus hysterectomy with reference to subjective bladder symptoms andincontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985; 64::375–379.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ewen SP, Sutton SJG. Initial experience with supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy and removal of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 101::225–228.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Smets M, Polet R, Bassil S. Laparoscopic supracervical (subtotal) hysterectomy: a first series of 500 cases. Gynaecol Endosc. 1997; 6::73–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Okaro EO, Jones KD, Sutton C. Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG. 2001; 108:10:1017–1020.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Yuen PM, Rogers MS. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: Do we need to remove the cervix? Aust NA J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 34:4:464–466.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Milad MP, Morrison K, Sokol A, Miller D, Kirkpatrick L. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15:3:286–288.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Han GS. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology. J Reprod Med. 1996; 41::521–528.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kilkku P, Gronroos M. Peroperative electro-coagulation of the endocervical mucosa and later carcinoma of the cervical stump. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982; 61::265.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Drife J. Conserving the cervix at hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gyneco. 1994; 101::563–564.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Scott JR, Sharp HT, Dodson MK, Norton PA, Warner HR. Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology: A decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176::1186–1192.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Van der Stege JG, Van Beek JJ. Problems related to the cervical stump at follow-up in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Soc iMparoendosc Surg. 1999; 3::5–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Munro MG. Supracervical hysterectomy: A time for reappraisal. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 79:1:133–138.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2002.2.8
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial
Keyword(s): Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy and Supracervical

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error