1887
Volume 2025, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Distal femoral fractures (DFFs) present significant therapeutic challenges owing to their anatomical complexity and variable outcomes, particularly in resource-limited settings, such as Yemen, where high-energy trauma from road traffic accidents is prevalent. Locking compression plates (LCPs) have emerged as promising treatment modalities in such contexts; however, their efficacy remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of DFFs treated with LCPs in Sana’a, Yemen.

This prospective cohort study was conducted at Al-Kuwait University Hospital from March 20, 2022, to April 20, 2024, enrolling 18 patients with DFFs treated using LCPs. Patients underwent monthly follow-ups for 9 months, with functional outcomes assessed using Neer’s scoring system, which categorizes results as excellent (>85), good (70–85), fair (55–69), or poor (<55). Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 26.0.

Among 18 patients (mean age: 36.8 ± 13.8 years; 61.1% male), 50.0% sustained fractures from road traffic accidents, reflecting Yemen’s trauma profile. The Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification identified A3 fractures as the most common (27.8%). Neer scores averaged 78.2 ± 12.6, with 38.9% excellent (7/18), 44.4% good (8/18), 11.1% fair (2/18), and 5.6% poor (1/18) outcomes. Excellent or good results (83.3%) were consistent across sexes ( ;= ;0.81) and fracture types (open vs. closed; ;= ;1.0). Complications occurred in 27.8% (5/18) of patients, including superficial infection (11.1%), deep infection (5.6%), and delayed union (11.1%), with a non-significant trend toward poorer outcomes in affected patients (60% vs. 92.3%; ;= ;0.15). No non-unions were observed.

LCPs achieved excellent or good functional outcomes in 83.3% of cases, with a 27.8% complication rate, supporting their efficacy for A-type and osteoporotic fractures in resource-constrained, trauma-heavy settings. Larger studies with extended follow-up periods are essential to validate these findings and assess long-term risks, such as posttraumatic arthritis.

© 2025 Al-Hamzi, Al-Moaish, Soliaman, Al-Hetari, Al-Haddad, Jowah, licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.25
2025-09-22
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2025/3/jemtac.2025.25.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.25&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P. Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop. 2018 Jan; 42:191–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00264-017-3665-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Berner A, Schütz M. Distal femur fractures. In: Oestern H-J, Trentz O, Uranues S, Arnold W, Ganzer U (eds), Bone and Joint Injuries: Trauma Surgery III. 2014: 297:–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38388-5_22
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arneson TJ, Melton LJ, Lewallen DG, O’Fallon WM. Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965-1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Sep; 234:188.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198809000-00033
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Lundin N, Huttunen TT, Enocson A, Marcano AI, Felländer-Tsai L, Berg HE. Epidemiology and mortality of pelvic and femur fractures-a nationwide register study of 417,840 fractures in Sweden across 16 years: diverging trends for potentially lethal fractures. Acta Orthop. 2021 Jun; 92:(3):323–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1878329
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Dekeyser G, Thorne T, Martin BI, Haller JM. Changing epidemiology of distal femur fractures: increase in geriatric fractures and rates of distal femur replacement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec; 32:(24):e1289–98. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00007
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Unim B, Minelli G, Da Cas R, Manno V, Trotta F, Palmieri L, et al. Trends in hip and distal femoral fracture rates in Italy from 2007 to 2017. Bone. 2021 Jan; 142:115752.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BONE.2020.115752
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Harahap R. Surgical incision technique approach on distal femur fracture: a literature review. Al-Iqra Med J. 2021 Mar; 4:(1):31–9. https://doi.org/10.26618/AIMJ.V4I1.4903
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Von Keudell A, Shoji K, Nasr M, Lucas R, Dolan R, Weaver MJ. Treatment options for distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Aug; 30:S25–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000621
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Stover M. Distal femoral fractures: current treatment, results and problems. Injury. 2001 Dec; 32:3.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00179-6
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gwathmey FW, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Kahler D, Hurwitz S, Cui Q. Distal femoral fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Oct; 18:(10):597–607.https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201010000-00003
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gangavalli AK, Nwachuku CO. Management of distal femur fractures in adults: an overview of options. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan; 47:85.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCL.2015.08.011
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Claireaux HA, Searle HKC, Parsons NR, Griffin XL. Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct; 10:(10):CD010606.https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010606.PUB3
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Agarwal-Harding KJ, Meara JG, Greenberg SLM, Hagander LE, Zurakowski D, Dyer GSM. Estimating the global incidence of femoral fracture from road traffic collisions: a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Mar; 97:e31.https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00314
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Reyes R, González-Alonso M, Amhaz-Escanlar S, De Castro A, Pino-Mínguez J, Jorge-Mora A. Distal femoral fractures. In: Sözen S (ed.), Topics in Trauma Surgery. IntechOpen; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108136
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005). J Orthop Trauma. 2006 May; 20:(5):366–71.https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200605000-00013
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts C, Karam M, Kellam J. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan; 32:S1.https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Neer CS, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967 Jun; 49:(4):591–613
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Tsegaye YA, Tegegne BB, Ayehu GW, Amisalu BT, Sulala AC. Prospective study on functional outcome of distal femur fracture treated by open reduction and internal fixation using distal femur locking plate in Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital, Bahirdar, North West Ethiopia. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep; 19:582.https://doi.org/10.1186/S13018-024-05054-7
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gupta G, Sah RK, Thakur P, Ruhullaha M, Thapa S. Functional outcome of locking compression plate in distal femur fractures. Med Phoenix. 2023; 8:7–13. https://doi.org/10.3126/MEDPHOENIX.V8I2.61825
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar P, Kumar M. Functional outcome of management of distal femur fractures with locking compression plate. Int J Orthop Sci. 2021; 7:563–8. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2021.v7.i4h.2935
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Vishwanath C, Harish K, Gunnaiah KG, Kumar C. Surgical outcome of distal femur fracture by locking compression plate. Int J Orthop Sci. 2016; 2:233–9. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2016.v2.i4d.38
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kiyono M, Noda T, Nagano H, Maehara T, Yamakawa Y, Mochizuki Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of treatment with locking compression plates for distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov; 14:(1):384.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1401-9
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Pipal RK, Pipal DK, Yadav S, Pipal V, Kothari S. Results of locking compression plate in the management of fracture distal end of femur in adults. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018; 4:(2):1029–33.https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i2o.147
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Saini RA, Shah N, Sharma D. Functional outcome of distal femoral fractures treated with DF-LCP [Distal femur locking compression plate]. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018; 4:(1):439–44. https://doi.org/10.22271/ORTHO.2018.V4.I1G.63
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kwon G-J, Jo M-L, Oh J-K, Lee S-J. Effects of Screw Configuration on Biomechanical Stability during Extra-articular Complex Fracture Fixation of the Distal Femur Treated with Locking Compression Plate. J Biomed Eng Res. 2010 Jun 30; 31:(3):199–209.https://doi.org/10.9718/JBER.2010.31.3.199
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hathiwale MI, Sasnur PA, Thimmarayappa SG. Study of functional outcome of muller type C distal femur fracture treated with locking compression plate. Int J Res Orthop. 2023 Sep; 9:(5):982–7.https://doi.org/10.18203/ISSN.2455-4510.INTJRESORTHOP20232611
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Heiney JP, Barnett MD, Vrabec GA, Schoenfeld AJ, Baji A, Njus GO. Distal femoral fixation: A biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (I.M.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate. J Trauma. 2009 Feb; 66:(2):443–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0B013E31815EDEB8
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu J, Hein D, Huffman C, Rao BM, Cooper J, Ebraheim NA. Surgical outcomes of non-periprosthetic distal femur fragility fractures treated with a locking plate. Ann Jt. 2022 Oct; 7:32. https://doi.org/10.21037/AOJ-22-15
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Gurung R, Terrill A, White G, Windolf M, Hofmann-Fliri L, Dlaska C, et al. Severity of complications after locking plate osteosynthesis in distal femur fractures. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar; 13:1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM13051492.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Consortium S. LCP versus LISS in the treatment of open and closed distal femur fractures: does it make a difference? J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jun; 30:e212.https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000507
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Bai Y, Zhang X, Tian Y, Tian D, Zhang B. Incidence of surgical-site infection following open reduction and internal fixation of a distal femur fracture: an observational case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb; 98:e14547. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014547
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Brodke D, O’Hara N, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke C, Gupta J, et al. Predictors of deep infection after distal femur fracture: a multicenter study. J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Apr; 37:(4):161–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002514
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoon BH, Park IK, Kim Y, Oh HK, Choo SK, Sung YB. Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Feb; 141:(2):225–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/S00402-020-03463-X
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ibrahim JM, Conway D, Haonga BT, Eliezer EN, Morshed S, Shearer DW. Predictors of lower health-related quality of life after operative repair of diaphyseal femur fractures in a low-resource setting. Injury. 2018 Jul; 49:(7):1330–5.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INJURY.2018.05.021
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Giver Jensen T, Aqeel Khudhair Almadareb M, Booth Nielsen M, Jesper Hansen E, Lindberg-Larsen M. Outcome after treatment of distal fibula fractures using one-third tubular plate, locking compression plate or distal anatomical locking compression plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 May-Jun; 62:(3):524–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.JFAS.2022.12.008
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Betancourt MCC, Maia CR, Munhoz M, Morais CL, Machado EG. A review of risk factors for post-traumatic hip and knee osteoarthritis following musculoskeletal injuries other than anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Nov; 14:(4):38747. https://doi.org/10.52965/001C.38747
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Cone R, Roszman A, Conway Y, Cichos K, McGwin G, Spitler CA. Risk factors for nonunion of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Apr; 37:(4):175–80.https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002553
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.25
Loading
Functional outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with locking compression plates in Yemen: A prospective study
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care 2025, 25 (2025); https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2025.25
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.25
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.25
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AO/OTA classification, complications, Distal femoral fracture, functional outcome, locking compression plate, Neer’s score, orthopedic surgery and Yemen

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error