1887
Volume 2025, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Cadaveric simulation involves using preserved or fresh human bodies or body parts to provide highly realistic surgical training opportunities for healthcare students and professionals. It is a helpful method in medical education as it enables trainees to practice on real human anatomical structures. At Cambridge University Hospital, cadavers are imported from the United States, leading to storage and procurement challenges. Ensuring the psychological safety of learners is a high priority, with strict guidelines and faculty supervision. Cadaveric training is considered superior to plastic or virtual reality simulators as it offers comprehensive anatomical understanding and skills development. However, concerns about cost, ethical implications, and psychological impact persist. Artificial intelligence and augmented reality innovations could be potential alternatives to mitigate ethical concerns and logistical challenges and improve psychological safety. While cadaveric simulation continues to be vital in medical training in many countries worldwide, integrating advanced technologies could enhance learning experiences and address current limitations.

© 2025 Sinthuraj, Makker, Alinier et al., licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.24
2025-09-08
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2025/3/jemtac.2025.24.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.24&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alinier G. A typology of educationally focused medical simulation tools. Med Teach. 2007Oct;29:(8):e243-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701551185
     [Google Scholar]
  2. James HK, Pattison GTR, Fisher JD, Griffin D. Cadaveric simulation versus standard training for postgraduate trauma and orthopaedic surgical trainees: protocol for the CAD:TRAUMA study multicentre randomised controlled educational trial. BMJ Open. 2020Sep;10:(9):e037319. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037319
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Duhem H, Viglino D, Bellier A, Tanguy S, Descombe V, Boucher F, et al. Cadaver models for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and perspectives. Resuscitation. 2019Oct;143:68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.009
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cambridge Surgical Training Centre. Education and training;2025. https://www.cambridgesurgicaltraining.co.uk/courses/education-and-training/ [Accessed 08 March 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Swain C, Stathakarou N, Alzuguren P, Lemarteleur V, Moffatt R, Karlgren K. Trauma surgical simulation: discussing the replacement of live animals used as human patient simulators. Adv Simul. 2024;9:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00279-2
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Swain CS, Cohen HML, Helgesson G, Rickard RF, Karlgren K. A systematic review of live animal use as a simulation modality (“live tissue training”) in the emergency management of trauma. J Surg Educ. 2023Sep;80:(9):1320-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.06.018
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Alraddadi A. Literature review of anatomical variations: clinical significance, identification approach, and teaching strategies. Cureus. 2021Apr;13:(4):e14451. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14451
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kyaw Tun J, Alinier G, Tang J, Kneebone RL. Redefining simulation fidelity for healthcare education. Simul Gaming. 2015Apr;46:(2):159-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878115576103
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Giger U, Frésard I, Häfliger A, Bergmann M, Krähenbühl L. Laparoscopic training on Thiel human cadavers: a model to teach advanced laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2008Apr;22:(4):901-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9502-7
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Yiasemidou M, Gkaragkani E, Glassman D, Biyani CS. Cadaveric simulation: a review of reviews. Ir J Med Sci. 2018Aug;187:(3):827-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1704-y
     [Google Scholar]
  11. James HK, Fawdington RA. Freestyle deliberate practice cadaveric hand surgery simulation training for orthopedic residents: cohort study. JMIR Med Educ. 2022Jun;8:(2):e34791. https://doi.org/10.2196/34791
     [Google Scholar]
  12. James HK, Pattison GTR, Griffin DR, Fisher JD. How does cadaveric simulation influence learning in orthopedic residents? J Surg Educ. 2020May;77:(3):671-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.12.006
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Alsabri M, Boudi Z, Lauque D, Dias RD, Whelan JS, Östlundh L, et al. Impact of teamwork and communication training interventions on safety culture and patient safety in emergency departments: a systematic review. J Patient Saf. 2022Jan;18:(1):e351-e61. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000782
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Animal Ethics. The use of animals in universities; 2025. https://www.animal-ethics.org/the-use-of-animals-in-universities/ [Accessed 08 March 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Asante EA, Maalman RS, Ali MA, Donkor YO, Korpisah JK. Perception and attitude of medical students towards cadaveric dissection in anatomical science education. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021Jul;31:(4):867-74. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.22
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Said Ahmed MAA. Use of the anatomage virtual table in medical education and as a diagnostic tool: an integrative review. Cureus. 2023Mar;15:(3):e35981. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35981
     [Google Scholar]
  17. University of Dundee. Dundee Institute for Healthcare Simulation - General Surgery Courses, Laparoscopic Courses, Surgical Skills Training, Thiel Cadaver Courses; 2018. https://dihs.dundee.ac.uk/surgical-skills/courses [Accessed 08 March 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  18. eWIN. Case study: cadaveric surgical skills workshop. NHS Health Education England;2025. https://www.ewin.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/eWIN%20Case%20Study%20-%20Cadaveric%20Surgical%20Skills%20Workshop.pdf [Accessed 08 March 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  19. NHS England. CADSIM; 2020. https://www.yorksandhumberdeanery.nhs.uk/surgery/cadsim [Accessed 08 March 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  20. UK Government Legislation. Human Tissue Act 2004; 2015. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/part/2/crossheading/the-human-tissue-authority [Accessed 08 March 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wisenden PA, Budke KJ, Klemetson CJ, Kurtti TR, Patel CM, Schwantz TL, et al. Emotional response of undergraduates to cadaver dissection. Clin Anat. 2018Mar;31:(2):224-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22992
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Webb AL, Smyth L, Hafiz M, Valter K. The question of dissection in medical training: not just “if,” but “when”? A student perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2022Mar;15:(2):281-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2168
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Rudolph J, Raemer D, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014Dec;9:(6):339-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Habicht JL, Kiessling C, Winkelmann A. Bodies for anatomy education in medical schools: an overview of the sources of cadavers worldwide. Acad Med. 2018Sep;93:(9):1293-300. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002227
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Zubair A, Waheed S, Shuja F. Psychological impact of cadaveric dissection on first-year medical students. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2021Jun;51:(2):173-6. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2021.419
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Owolabi JO, Tijani AA, Ihunwo AO. A need to protect the health and rights of anatomists working in dissection laboratories. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022May;15:889-93. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S362305
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Javadnia F, Hashemitabar M, Kalantarmahdavi SR, Khajehmougahi N. How to decrease the emotional impact of cadaver dissection in medical students. Pak J Med Sci. 2006Apr;22:(2):200-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Bamber AR, Quince TA, Barclay SIG, Clark JDA, Siklos PWL, Wood DF. Medical student attitudes to the autopsy and its utility in medical education: a brief qualitative study at one UK Medical School. Anat Sci Educ. 2014Mar;7:(2):87-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1384
     [Google Scholar]
  29. McDermott DS, Ludlow J, Horsley E, Meakim C. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM prebriefing: preparation and briefing. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021; 58:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.008
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Decker S, Alinier G, Crawford SB, Gordon RM, Jenkins D, Wilson C. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM the debriefing process. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021; 58:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Leboulanger N. First cadaver dissection: stress, preparation, and emotional experience. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011Sep;128:(4):175-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2011.01.007
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Alinier G, Oriot D. Simulation-based education: deceiving learners with good intent. Adv Simul (Lond). 2022Mar;7:(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00206-3
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kardong-Edgren SS, Farra SL, Alinier G, Young HM. A call to unify definitions of virtual reality. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019Jun;31:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.02.006
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Zakhary B, Shekar K, Diaz R, Badulak J, Johnston L, Roeleveld PP, et al. Position paper on Global Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Education and Educational Agenda for the Future: A Statement From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization ECMOed Taskforce. Crit Care Med. 2020Mar;48:(3):406-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004158
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Beaven A, Griffin D, James H. Highly realistic cadaveric trauma simulation of the multiply injured battlefield casualty: an international, multidisciplinary exercise in far-forward surgical management. Injury. 2021May;52:(5):1183-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.023
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Costello DM, Huntington I, Burke G, Farrugia B, O’Connor AJ, Costello AJ, et al. A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education. J Robot Surg. 2022Aug;16:(4):749-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01302-8
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Delpech PO, Danion J, Oriot D, Richer JP, Breque C, Faure JP. SimLife a new model of simulation using a pulsated revascularized and reventilated cadaver for surgical education. J Visc Surg. 2017Feb;154:(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.06.006
     [Google Scholar]
  38. James HK, Chapman AW, Pattison GTR, Griffin DR, Fisher JD. Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training. Br J Surg. 2019Dec;106:(13):1726-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11325
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Whitburn J, Marsden G, Sooriakumaran P. The Human Tissue Act: a guide for clinical researchers. J Clin Urol. 2018;11:148–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Abraham J. Practicing on newly dead: a type of cadaver simulation. SAGE Open. 2015;5:32158244015595270. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015595270
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Dhar P, Tetyana R, M. SR, Garth S, Smith C. Augmented reality in medical education: students’ experiences and learning outcomes. Med Educ Online. 2021Dec;26:(1):1953953. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1953953
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.24
Loading
Exploring the benefits, challenges, and psychological safety of using cadaveric simulation in medical education and training
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care 2025, 24 (2025); https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2025.24
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.24
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.24
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): Cadaver, education, ethics, psychological safety, simulation and skills training

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error