1887
Volume 2025, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • E-ISSN: 1999-7094

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a multidisciplinary field that focuses on developing intelligent computer algorithms to carry out simple to complex tasks traditionally performed using human intelligence. In anesthesia, AI is rapidly becoming a transformative technology. However, its efficacy remains unknown. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the efficacy of AI in anesthesia by studying two main applications of AI: predicting anesthesia-related events and assisting with anesthesia-related procedures.

A systematic search was performed for English-language records published from inception until June 2024 in PubMed, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science databases. Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they examined the role of any AI model in predicting hypotension, hypoxemia, and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Moreover, studies investigating the role of AI in guiding anesthesia-related procedures, such as tracheal intubation and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, were included. The CMA software and STATA 16.0 were used for statistical analyses, while the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for quality evaluation.

Twenty studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The pooled results indicated that AI demonstrated good discrimination ability in predicting hypotension (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.81), with the subgroup analysis showing that models incorporating machine-learning algorithms outperformed other models (AUROC: 0.93). Similarly, the pooled analysis showed that AI models had a good discriminatory capacity for predicting hypoxemia (AUROC: 0.81). However, AI demonstrated poor discriminatory capability in predicting PONV (AUROC: 0.68). Our analysis also showed that robotically assisted intubations were successful in both mannikins and humans (success rate: 98% and 92%). Similarly, robotically assisted ultrasound-guided blocks were successful in mannikins and humans (success rate: 96% for humans and mannikins).

This study suggests that AI is useful for predicting anesthesia-related events and automating procedures such as intubation and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. However, multiple barriers hindering the integration of AI into anesthesia, such as cost, privacy and security concerns, data quality, “black box”, and ethical issues need to be addressed.

Loading

جارٍ تحميل قياسات المقالة...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
٢٠٢٥-٠٥-١٤
٢٠٢٦-٠٣-٠٤

القياسات

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2025/2/jemtac.2025.22.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bellman R. An introduction to artificial intelligence: Can computers think? Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company; 1978.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  2. Bellini V, Valente M, Gaddi AV, Pelosi P, Bignami E. Artificial intelligence and telemedicine in anesthesia: potential and problems. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022; 88:(9):729–34. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.21.16241-8
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  3. Hashimoto DA, Witkowski E, Gao L, Meireles O, Rosman G. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: Current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations. Anesthesiology. 2020; 132:(2):379–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002960
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  4. Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. 3rd ed. Global ed. BostonPearson2016.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  5. Glen JB. The development of ’Diprifusor’: A TCI system for propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53:(Suppl 1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1998.53s115.x
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  6. Liberman MY, Ching S, Chemali J, Brown EN. A closed-loop anesthetic delivery system for real-time control of burst suppression. J Neural Eng. 2013; 10:(4):046004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/046004
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  7. Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landais A, Boichut N, Dussaussoy C, et al. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: A randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011; 112:(3):546–57. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318205680b
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  8. Solanki SL, Pandrowala S, Nayak A, Bhandare M, Ambulkar RP, Shrikhande SV. Artificial intelligence in perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries. World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27:(21):2758–70. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i21.2758
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  9. Chiew CJ, Liu N, Wong TH, Sim YE, Abdullah HR. Utilizing machine learning methods for preoperative prediction of postsurgical mortality and intensive care unit admission. Ann Surg. 2020; 272:(6):1133–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003297
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  10. Corey KM, Kashyap S, Lorenzi E, Lagoo-Deenadayalan SA, Heller K, Whalen K, et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study. PLoS Med. 2018; 15:(11):e1002701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  11. Ehrenfeld JM, Rehman MA. Anesthesia information management systems: A review of functionality and installation considerations. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011; 25:(1):71–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-010-9256-y
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  12. Nair BG, Newman S-F, Peterson GN, Schwid HA. Smart Anesthesia Manager\rm TM (SAM)—A real-time decision support system for anesthesia care during surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60:(1):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2205384
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  13. Hany HA, Shaban EE, Shallik N, Shaban A, Shaban A, Elgassim M. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis: Evaluating the effectiveness and integration obstacles of artificial intelligence (AI) within anesthesia departments. 19 June 2024, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4599435/v1
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  14. Çorbacioglu SK, Aksel G. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies. A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value. Turk J Emerg Med. 2023; 23:(4):195–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_182_23
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  15. Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: A critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002; 7:(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819021927674
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  16. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327:(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  17. Palla K, Hyland SL, Posner K, Ghosh P, Nair B, Bristow M, et al. Intraoperative prediction of postanaesthesia care unit hypotension. Br J Anaesth. 2022; 128:(4):623–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.052
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  18. Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, Lee C, Settels J, Sibert K, et al. Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018; 129:(4):663–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  19. Wijnberge M, van der Ster BJP, Geerts BF, de Beer F, Beurskens C, Emal D, et al. Clinical performance of a machine-learning algorithm to predict intra-operative hypotension with noninvasive arterial pressure waveforms: A cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021; 38:(6):609–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001521
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  20. Lin C-S, Chiu J-S, Hsieh M-H, Mok MS, Li Y-C, Chiu H-W. Predicting hypotensive episodes during spinal anesthesia with the application of artificial neural networks. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008; 92:(2):193–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.06.013
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  21. Lin C-S, Chang C-C, Chiu J-S, Lee Y-W, Lin J-A, Mok MS, et al. Application of an artificial neural network to predict postinduction hypotension during general anesthesia. Med Decis Making. 2011Mar–Apr; 31:(2):308–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10379648
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  22. Gratz I, Baruch M, Takla M, Seaman J, Allen I, McEniry B, et al. The application of a neural network to predict hypotension and vasopressor requirements non-invasively in obstetric patients having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section (C/S). BMC Anesthesiol. 2020; 20:(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01015-9
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  23. Kendale S, Kulkarni P, Rosenberg AD, Wang J. Supervised machine-learning predictive analytics for prediction of postinduction hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2018; 129:(4):675–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002374
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  24. Li X-F, Huang Y-Z, Tang J-Y, Li R-C, Wang X-Q. Development of a random forest model for hypotension prediction after anesthesia induction for cardiac surgery. World J Clin Cases. 2021; 9:(29):8729–39. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8729
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  25. Geng W, Tang H, Sharma A, Zhao Y, Yan Y, Hong W. An artificial neural network model for prediction of hypoxemia during sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47:(5):2097–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519834459
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  26. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, Horibe M, Eisses MJ, Adams T, et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018; 2:(10):749–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  27. Kim J-H, Cheon B-R, Kim M-G, Hwang S-M, Lim S-Y, Lee J-J, et al. Postoperative nausea and vomiting prediction: Machine learning insights from a comprehensive analysis of perioperative data. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10:(10):1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10101152
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  28. Gong C-SA, Yu L, Ting C-K, Tsou M-Y, Chang K-Y, Shen C-L, et al. Predicting postoperative vomiting for orthopedic patients receiving patient-controlled epidural analgesia with the application of an artificial neural network. Biomed Res Int. 2014: 2014:786418. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/786418
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  29. Shim J-G, Ryu K-H, Cho E-A, Ahn JH, Cha YB, Lim G, et al. Machine learning for prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. PLoS One. 2022; 17:(12):e0277957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277957
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  30. Bassanezi BSB, de Oliveira-Filho AG, Jafelice RSM, Bustorff-Silva JM, Udelsmann A. Postoperative vomiting in pediatric oncologic patients: Prediction by a fuzzy logic model. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013; 23:(1):68–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12000
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  31. Wu H-Y, Gong C-SA, Lin S-P, Chang K-Y, Tsou M-Y, Ting C-K. Predicting postoperative vomiting among orthopedic patients receiving patient-controlled epidural analgesia using SVM and LR. Sci Rep. 2016: 6:27041. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27041
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  32. Hemmerling TM, Wehbe M, Zaouter C, Taddei R, Morse J. The Kepler intubation system. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114:(3):590–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182410cbf
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  33. Biro P, Hofmann P, Gage D, Boehler Q, Chautems C, Braun J, et al. Automated tracheal intubation in an airway manikin using a robotic endoscope: A proof of concept study. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75:(7):881–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14945
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  34. Hemmerling TM, Taddei R, Wehbe M, Zaouter C, Cyr S, Morse J. First robotic tracheal intubations in humans using the Kepler intubation system. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 108:(6):1011–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes034
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  35. Morse J, Terrasini N, Wehbe M, Philippona C, Zaouter C, Cyr S, et al. Comparison of success rates, learning curves, and inter-subject performance variability of robot-assisted and manual ultrasound-guided nerve block needle guidance in simulation. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112:(6):1092–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet440
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  36. Hemmerling TM, Taddei R, Wehbe M, Cyr S, Zaouter C, Morse J. Technical communication: First robotic ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in humans using the Magellan system. Anesth Analg. 2013; 116:(2):491–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b49
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  37. Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, et al. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: Toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013; 119:(3):507–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  38. Maheshwari K, Turan A, Mao G, Yang D, Niazi AK, Agarwal D, et al. The association of hypotension during non-cardiac surgery, before and after skin incision, with postoperative acute kidney injury: A retrospective cohort analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018; 73:(10):1223–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14416
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  39. Dunham CM, Hileman BM, Hutchinson AE, Chance EA, Huang GS. Perioperative hypoxemia is common with horizontal positioning during general anesthesia and is associated with major adverse outcomes: A retrospective study of consecutive patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014: 14:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-43
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  40. Strachan L, Noble DW. Hypoxia and surgical patients – prevention and treatment of an unnecessary cause of morbidity and mortality. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001; 46:(5):297–302.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  41. Teoh WHL, Shah MK, Sia ATH. Randomised comparison of Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64:(10):1125–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06032.x
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  42. Raimundo R, Rosário A. The impact of artificial intelligence on data system security: A literature review. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21:(21):7029. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217029
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  43. Harvey HB, Gowda V. Regulatory issues and challenges to artificial intelligence adoption. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021; 59:(6):1075–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2021.07.007
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  44. Coppola L, Cianflone A, Grimaldi AM, Incoronato M, Bevilacqua P, Messina F, et al. Biobanking in health care: Evolution and future directions. Transl Med. 2019; 17:(1):172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1922-3
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  45. Keskinbora KH. Medical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence. J Clin Neurosci. 2019: 64:277–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.001
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  46. Belenguer L. AI bias: Exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI Ethics. 2022; 2:(4):771–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  47. Lopes S, Rocha G, Guimarães-Pereira L. Artificial intelligence and its clinical application in Anesthesiology: A systematic review. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38:(2):247–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-023-01088-0
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  48. Farhud DD, Zokaei S. Ethical issues of artificial intelligence in medicine and healthcare. Iran J Public Health. 2021; 50:(11):i–v. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7600
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
Loading

جارٍ تحميل البيانات والوسائط...

الأكثر اقتباسًا لهذا الشهر Most Cited RSS feed

هذه الخانة مطلوبة
يُرجى إدخال عنوان بريد إلكتروني صالح
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error