1887
Volume 2025, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a multidisciplinary field that focuses on developing intelligent computer algorithms to carry out simple to complex tasks traditionally performed using human intelligence. In anesthesia, AI is rapidly becoming a transformative technology. However, its efficacy remains unknown. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the efficacy of AI in anesthesia by studying two main applications of AI: predicting anesthesia-related events and assisting with anesthesia-related procedures.

A systematic search was performed for English-language records published from inception until June 2024 in PubMed, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science databases. Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they examined the role of any AI model in predicting hypotension, hypoxemia, and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Moreover, studies investigating the role of AI in guiding anesthesia-related procedures, such as tracheal intubation and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, were included. The CMA software and STATA 16.0 were used for statistical analyses, while the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used for quality evaluation.

Twenty studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The pooled results indicated that AI demonstrated good discrimination ability in predicting hypotension (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.81), with the subgroup analysis showing that models incorporating machine-learning algorithms outperformed other models (AUROC: 0.93). Similarly, the pooled analysis showed that AI models had a good discriminatory capacity for predicting hypoxemia (AUROC: 0.81). However, AI demonstrated poor discriminatory capability in predicting PONV (AUROC: 0.68). Our analysis also showed that robotically assisted intubations were successful in both mannikins and humans (success rate: 98% and 92%). Similarly, robotically assisted ultrasound-guided blocks were successful in mannikins and humans (success rate: 96% for humans and mannikins).

This study suggests that AI is useful for predicting anesthesia-related events and automating procedures such as intubation and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. However, multiple barriers hindering the integration of AI into anesthesia, such as cost, privacy and security concerns, data quality, “black box”, and ethical issues need to be addressed.

© 2025 Zaki, Elmelliti, Shaban, Shaban, Shaban, Elgassim, et al., licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
2025-05-14
2026-01-18

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2025/2/jemtac.2025.22.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bellman R. An introduction to artificial intelligence: Can computers think? Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company; 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellini V, Valente M, Gaddi AV, Pelosi P, Bignami E. Artificial intelligence and telemedicine in anesthesia: potential and problems. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022; 88:(9):729–34. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.21.16241-8
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Hashimoto DA, Witkowski E, Gao L, Meireles O, Rosman G. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: Current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations. Anesthesiology. 2020; 132:(2):379–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002960
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. 3rd ed. Global ed. BostonPearson2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Glen JB. The development of ’Diprifusor’: A TCI system for propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53:(Suppl 1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1998.53s115.x
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Liberman MY, Ching S, Chemali J, Brown EN. A closed-loop anesthetic delivery system for real-time control of burst suppression. J Neural Eng. 2013; 10:(4):046004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/046004
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landais A, Boichut N, Dussaussoy C, et al. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: A randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011; 112:(3):546–57. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318205680b
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Solanki SL, Pandrowala S, Nayak A, Bhandare M, Ambulkar RP, Shrikhande SV. Artificial intelligence in perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries. World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27:(21):2758–70. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i21.2758
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chiew CJ, Liu N, Wong TH, Sim YE, Abdullah HR. Utilizing machine learning methods for preoperative prediction of postsurgical mortality and intensive care unit admission. Ann Surg. 2020; 272:(6):1133–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003297
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Corey KM, Kashyap S, Lorenzi E, Lagoo-Deenadayalan SA, Heller K, Whalen K, et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study. PLoS Med. 2018; 15:(11):e1002701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ehrenfeld JM, Rehman MA. Anesthesia information management systems: A review of functionality and installation considerations. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011; 25:(1):71–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-010-9256-y
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Nair BG, Newman S-F, Peterson GN, Schwid HA. Smart Anesthesia Manager\rm TM (SAM)—A real-time decision support system for anesthesia care during surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60:(1):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2205384
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hany HA, Shaban EE, Shallik N, Shaban A, Shaban A, Elgassim M. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis: Evaluating the effectiveness and integration obstacles of artificial intelligence (AI) within anesthesia departments. 19 June 2024, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4599435/v1
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Çorbacioglu SK, Aksel G. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies. A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value. Turk J Emerg Med. 2023; 23:(4):195–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_182_23
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: A critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002; 7:(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819021927674
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327:(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Palla K, Hyland SL, Posner K, Ghosh P, Nair B, Bristow M, et al. Intraoperative prediction of postanaesthesia care unit hypotension. Br J Anaesth. 2022; 128:(4):623–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.052
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, Lee C, Settels J, Sibert K, et al. Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018; 129:(4):663–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Wijnberge M, van der Ster BJP, Geerts BF, de Beer F, Beurskens C, Emal D, et al. Clinical performance of a machine-learning algorithm to predict intra-operative hypotension with noninvasive arterial pressure waveforms: A cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021; 38:(6):609–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001521
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin C-S, Chiu J-S, Hsieh M-H, Mok MS, Li Y-C, Chiu H-W. Predicting hypotensive episodes during spinal anesthesia with the application of artificial neural networks. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008; 92:(2):193–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.06.013
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin C-S, Chang C-C, Chiu J-S, Lee Y-W, Lin J-A, Mok MS, et al. Application of an artificial neural network to predict postinduction hypotension during general anesthesia. Med Decis Making. 2011Mar–Apr; 31:(2):308–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10379648
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gratz I, Baruch M, Takla M, Seaman J, Allen I, McEniry B, et al. The application of a neural network to predict hypotension and vasopressor requirements non-invasively in obstetric patients having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section (C/S). BMC Anesthesiol. 2020; 20:(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01015-9
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kendale S, Kulkarni P, Rosenberg AD, Wang J. Supervised machine-learning predictive analytics for prediction of postinduction hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2018; 129:(4):675–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002374
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Li X-F, Huang Y-Z, Tang J-Y, Li R-C, Wang X-Q. Development of a random forest model for hypotension prediction after anesthesia induction for cardiac surgery. World J Clin Cases. 2021; 9:(29):8729–39. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8729
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Geng W, Tang H, Sharma A, Zhao Y, Yan Y, Hong W. An artificial neural network model for prediction of hypoxemia during sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47:(5):2097–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519834459
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, Horibe M, Eisses MJ, Adams T, et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018; 2:(10):749–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim J-H, Cheon B-R, Kim M-G, Hwang S-M, Lim S-Y, Lee J-J, et al. Postoperative nausea and vomiting prediction: Machine learning insights from a comprehensive analysis of perioperative data. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10:(10):1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10101152
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gong C-SA, Yu L, Ting C-K, Tsou M-Y, Chang K-Y, Shen C-L, et al. Predicting postoperative vomiting for orthopedic patients receiving patient-controlled epidural analgesia with the application of an artificial neural network. Biomed Res Int. 2014: 2014:786418. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/786418
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Shim J-G, Ryu K-H, Cho E-A, Ahn JH, Cha YB, Lim G, et al. Machine learning for prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. PLoS One. 2022; 17:(12):e0277957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277957
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Bassanezi BSB, de Oliveira-Filho AG, Jafelice RSM, Bustorff-Silva JM, Udelsmann A. Postoperative vomiting in pediatric oncologic patients: Prediction by a fuzzy logic model. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013; 23:(1):68–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12000
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu H-Y, Gong C-SA, Lin S-P, Chang K-Y, Tsou M-Y, Ting C-K. Predicting postoperative vomiting among orthopedic patients receiving patient-controlled epidural analgesia using SVM and LR. Sci Rep. 2016: 6:27041. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27041
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hemmerling TM, Wehbe M, Zaouter C, Taddei R, Morse J. The Kepler intubation system. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114:(3):590–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182410cbf
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Biro P, Hofmann P, Gage D, Boehler Q, Chautems C, Braun J, et al. Automated tracheal intubation in an airway manikin using a robotic endoscope: A proof of concept study. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75:(7):881–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14945
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Hemmerling TM, Taddei R, Wehbe M, Zaouter C, Cyr S, Morse J. First robotic tracheal intubations in humans using the Kepler intubation system. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 108:(6):1011–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes034
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Morse J, Terrasini N, Wehbe M, Philippona C, Zaouter C, Cyr S, et al. Comparison of success rates, learning curves, and inter-subject performance variability of robot-assisted and manual ultrasound-guided nerve block needle guidance in simulation. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112:(6):1092–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet440
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hemmerling TM, Taddei R, Wehbe M, Cyr S, Zaouter C, Morse J. Technical communication: First robotic ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in humans using the Magellan system. Anesth Analg. 2013; 116:(2):491–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b49
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, et al. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: Toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013; 119:(3):507–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Maheshwari K, Turan A, Mao G, Yang D, Niazi AK, Agarwal D, et al. The association of hypotension during non-cardiac surgery, before and after skin incision, with postoperative acute kidney injury: A retrospective cohort analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018; 73:(10):1223–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14416
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Dunham CM, Hileman BM, Hutchinson AE, Chance EA, Huang GS. Perioperative hypoxemia is common with horizontal positioning during general anesthesia and is associated with major adverse outcomes: A retrospective study of consecutive patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014: 14:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-43
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Strachan L, Noble DW. Hypoxia and surgical patients – prevention and treatment of an unnecessary cause of morbidity and mortality. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001; 46:(5):297–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Teoh WHL, Shah MK, Sia ATH. Randomised comparison of Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64:(10):1125–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06032.x
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Raimundo R, Rosário A. The impact of artificial intelligence on data system security: A literature review. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21:(21):7029. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217029
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Harvey HB, Gowda V. Regulatory issues and challenges to artificial intelligence adoption. Radiol Clin North Am. 2021; 59:(6):1075–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2021.07.007
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Coppola L, Cianflone A, Grimaldi AM, Incoronato M, Bevilacqua P, Messina F, et al. Biobanking in health care: Evolution and future directions. Transl Med. 2019; 17:(1):172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1922-3
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Keskinbora KH. Medical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence. J Clin Neurosci. 2019: 64:277–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.001
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Belenguer L. AI bias: Exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI Ethics. 2022; 2:(4):771–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Lopes S, Rocha G, Guimarães-Pereira L. Artificial intelligence and its clinical application in Anesthesiology: A systematic review. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38:(2):247–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-023-01088-0
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Farhud DD, Zokaei S. Ethical issues of artificial intelligence in medicine and healthcare. Iran J Public Health. 2021; 50:(11):i–v. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7600
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
Loading
Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis: Evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) effectiveness and integration obstacles within anesthesiology
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care 2025, 22 (2025); https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.22
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): anesthesia, artificial intelligence, difficult intubation, hypotension, hypoxemia, intraoperative, machine learning, post-operative nausea and vomiting, robotic intubation and robotic-assisted nerve blocks

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error