1887
  1. Home
  2. Conference Proceedings
  3. QScience Proceedings
  4. Engineering Leaders Conference 2014 on Engineering Education
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

The use of simulation-based labs has been gaining currency in the domains of engineering and technology programs. How effective is simulation-based teaching methodology in comparison to traditional hands-on activity based labs? To answer this question a study was conducted to explore the impact of the use of computer simulation design methods on students’ learning for circuit construction in an undergraduate technical course.

This paper presents the findings of the research study, which tested the hypothesis by investigating three key questions: 1) Does the use of simulation improve students’ learning outcomes? 2) How do faculty members perceive the use and effectiveness of simulation in the delivery of technical course content? 3) How do students perceive the instructional design features embedded in the simulation program such as exploration and scaffolding support in learning new concepts?

The paper also discusses the other aspects of findings, which reveal that simulation by itself is not very effective in promoting student learning. Simulation becomes effective when it is followed by hands-on activity. Furthermore, the paper presents recommendations for improving student learning, viz a viz simulation-based and hands-on labs.

© 2015 Taher, Khan, licensee Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.58
2015-08-29
2025-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.58.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.58&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Nahvi M. Dynamics of student-computer interaction in a simulation environment: Reflections on curricular issues. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education, USA. 1996;1383–1386.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Hsieh S, Hsieh PY. Integrating virtual learning system for programmable logic controller. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004; 93:2:169–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Veenman MV, Elshout J, Busato V. Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations. Computers in Human Behavior. 1994; 101:1:93–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. McKeachie WJ, Pintrich PR, Lin Y, Smith DAF. Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: Regents of The University of Michigan 1986.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Wolfe J. A history of business teaching games in English-speaking and post-socialist countries: The origination and diffusion of a management education and development technology. Simulation & Gaming. 1993; 24::446–463.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Garcia JR. Use of technology in developing problem solving/critical thinking skills. Journal of Industrial Technology. 1995; 11:1:14–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Pogrow S. Students who just don't understand. Educational Leadership. 1994; 52:3:62–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Magnusson SJ, Palincsar A. The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory into Practice. 1995; 34:1:43–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Yin RK, Case study research: Design and methods. [Google books version]. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://books.google.com/books?hl = en&lr = &id = k0WrN3rBzsC&oi = fnd&pg = PR7&dq sage+publications&ots = IWlPqCDanK&sig = HaSHzKaI3hHUzhgZeue9Kg6qYZE#v = onepage&q = &f = false .
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fraga JRCP, Marcelo C, de Castro A F, Franchin M N. Using Simulation Programs to enhance learning in electrical circuits classes, Anais do XXXIV COBENGE. Passo Fundo: Ed. Universidade de Passo Fundo, Setembro de 2006.
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.58
Loading

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error