1887

Abstract

Educating future generations of engineers and construction managers who will be well prepared to tackle the sustainability grand challenges in the global context will require a paradigm shift from traditional engineering education. There has been much debate in recent years that traditional engineering education has failed to adequately prepare the graduates to face ever-changing complex and multidisciplinary problems in a sustainable and global context. Thus, an innovative transformation of the curricula is needed to educate future engineering graduates to successfully solve sustainable grand challenges. Not only must they be grounded in the latest technical knowledge and tools, future engineers are expected to have adequate understanding of the societal, economical, and political issues and be able to work in diverse team environment and have excellent communication skills. Furthermore, the future generations of engineers and construction managers should possess a highly developed knowledge of the environmental sustainability. “” is the vision of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014). It is the guiding principle of this paper to provide an overview of the fundamental concepts that should be integrated within engineering and construction management curricula for sustainability in the context of global grand challenges. The curricula innovation from authors' own individual institutions will be presented as successful examples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.53
2015-08-29
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.53.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.53&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AASHE (The Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education). Sustainability Curriculum in High Education – A Call to Action. Denver, CO: AASHE 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chini AR, ed. Deconstruction and Materials Reuse: Technology, Economic and Policy. CIB Publication 266, Apri 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chini AR, ed. Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, Proceedings of the 11th Rinker International Conference, CIB Publication 287; 2003
  4. Chini AR, Bruening S. Deconstruction and Materials Reuse in the United States, International e-Journal of Construction, Special Issue article in: The Future of Sustainable Construction – 2003. Published: 14th May, 2003; 2003.
  5. Kibert CJ, ed. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Sustainable Construction, Tampa, Florida, 6–9 November 1994; 1994
  6. Crask L, Luo Y, Dyson A. Eco-Village: A Humane Solution to the Homeless. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Design & Construction. 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Luo Y, Crask L, Dyson A, Zoghi M, Hyatt B. The Eco-Village Experience at California State University, Fresno: An Integrated Approach to Service-Learning. Metropolitan Universities Journal. 2011; 21:3:1626.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Azarbayjani M, Futrell B, Cecchi V, Gentry T, Ebong A. The road map to the integrated design process of a net-zero energy solar house: a case study of a Solar Decathlon competition entry. Journal of Green Building. 2014; 9:2:2037.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 2014 Results of Challenge Home Student Competition. 2014. Retrieved from http://energy.gov/eere/buildings/2014-results .
  10. Wu W, Issa R. BIM Execution Planning in Green Building Projects: LEED as a Use Case. J. Manage. Eng. 2014; 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000314, A4014007.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.53
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error