1887

Abstract

The authors surveyed 315 patent practitioners with respect to both the engineering education coursework and engineering work experience that they seek in the transcripts and resumes of interview candidates entering their organizations. This set of technology professionals uses engineering education in support of innovation in early stages of technology development and therefore possesses an unexplored view of the research that will influence the needs of the engineering workforce for product development roles by 2020. An understanding of the educational needs of patent practitioners is useful to engineering education because patent practitioners tend to address global opportunities by handling cases in front of the patent offices of multiple countries. Specifically, it is common for a patent practitioner to represent and supervise the representation of applicants on a single family of patent cases in front of multiple patent offices in Europe, Asia and the Americas, thereby receiving uncommon global exposure to the opportunities and challenges represented by differing market conditions and differences in cultural norms with respect to both technology and communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.37
2015-08-29
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.37.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.37&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Schox J, Chesney D. How to teach Patent Law to Engineers. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 1997.
  2. Kaplan K, Kaplan J. Incorporating Intellectual Property into Engineering Education. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2003.
  3. Garris C. The United State Patent System: An Essential Role in Engineering Design Education. Journal of Engineering Education. 2001; 90:2:239246.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gorman M, Richards L, Scherer W, Kagiwada J. Teaching Invention and Design: Multi-Disciplinary Learning Modules. Journal of Engineering Education. 1995; 84:2:175185.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jerath S. Engineering: The Basic Degree of the Future, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2002.
  6. Crouch D. Estimate: Fewer that 26,000 Active Us Patent Attorneys and Agents, Patently-O, assessed from http://patentlyo.com/patent/2012/01/the-uspto-records-identify-more-than-41750-active-registered-practitioners-that-number-is-obviously-wrong-because-many-folk.html , Jan 13, 2012.
  7. Couch D. Survey on Fields-of-Study for Patent Practice, Patently-O, http://patentlyo.com/patent/2014/09/survey-fields-practice.html , Sept 17, 2014.
  8. Clifford Ralph D, Field Thomas G, Cavicchi Jon R. A Statistical Analysis of the Patent Bar: Where are the Software-Savvy Patent Attorneys? (April 30, 2010). North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology. 2010; 11::223. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 1626348 .
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.37
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.37
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error