1887

Abstract

Full research graduate degree programmes in engineering and science are a unique set of coordinated scientific activities with definite starting and finishing points to meet specific performance objectives within defined schedule, cost and performance parameters. Often in graduate engineering programmes, little emphasis is placed on proper research management before and during execution. This leads to improper management and overshooting deadlines, culminating in unnecessary stress on budgets, resources and time. In this article, we present a case study application of critical path method (CPM) scheduling without resource constraints in planning and managing a typical graduate chemical engineering research project. The case study describes a full MSc research degree programme that considers the synthesis and performance evaluation of a carbon nanotube-polyaspartamide (CNT-PAA) composite material for carbon dioxide capture from coal-fired power plants. Based on the approved project proposal, the scheduled project duration for completion of the degree programme is 104 weeks. However, results of the application of CPM scheduling to the project show expected project duration of ninety-four (94) weeks, indicating a reduction of about 10%. In the presence of unexpected variability in the activity time of the activities in the critical path (CP) during the life cycle of the project, the programme evaluation and review technique (PERT) reveals that there is 85 percent chance of completing the degree programme on, or before, the scheduled project deadline.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20
2015-08-29
2019-11-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.20.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Steyn H. Project Management: A multi-disciplinary approach. Pretoria South Africa: FPM Publishing 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bisschoff T, Govender C, Oosthuizen P. Project management in education and training. Van Schaik Publishers 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gray CF, Larson EW. Project management: The managerial process. Asia: McGraw-Hill 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chatfield C, A short course in project management. 2010, March 26;, [online]. Available: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/project/HA102354821033.aspx .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Galloway PD. “Comparative study of university courses on critical path method scheduling”. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2006;712722.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu M, Lam H-C. Critical Path scheduling under resource calendar constraints. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2008; 134::2531.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hegazy T. Optimization of resource allocation and levelling using genetic algorithms. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 1999; 125:3:167175.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bricknell L. Project planning: Part I. In: Oossthuizen TVenter R, eds. Project management in perspective. South Africa: Oxford University Press 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hadju M. Network scheduling techniques for construction project management. Netherlands: Netherlands Kluwer Academic Publisher 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.20
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error