1887
Volume 2025, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

To prospectively evaluate the correlation between the anatomical zone of the external wound and the location of internal injuries in patients undergoing exploration for penetrating neck trauma (PNT) in Sana’a, Yemen.

We prospectively enrolled patients presenting to teaching hospitals in Sana’a (January 2020–April 2021) with PNT who required neck exploration. The collected data included demographics, injury mechanisms, clinical presentation, imaging findings, intraoperative findings (external wound zone vs. internal injury site), and outcomes. Correlation was defined as an internal injury occurring within the same anatomical zone as the external wound. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test ( < 0.05).

Fifty-five male patients (mean age, 30.0 ± 9.2 years) were included. Gunshot wounds were the most common mechanism (61.8%), and most external wounds were located in Zone II (90.9%). Internal injuries were correlated with the external wound zone in 33 (60.0%) patients, whereas 22 (40.0%) had internal injuries in a different zone (most often inferior). No statistically significant association was found between the external wound zone and internal injury site ( = 0.208) or when analyzing specific zones or injury mechanisms ( > 0.05). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in 85.1% of patients. Morbidity occurred in 32.7% of the patients, with a mortality rate of 1.8%.

The anatomical zone of the external wound demonstrated a poor correlation and no statistically significant association with the site of internal injury in this cohort of patients with PNT requiring exploration. These findings challenge the utility of the traditional zone-based approach in guiding patient management. Patient hemodynamic status, clinical signs, and selective imaging (particularly CTA) appear to be more reliable determinants for intervention, supporting a “no-zone” management strategy.

© 2025 Al-Ameri, Obadiel, Gailan, Al-Amry, Jowah, licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.33
2025-09-18
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2025/3/jemtac.2025.33.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.33&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sperry JL, Moore EE, Coimbra R, Croce M, Davis JW, Karmy-Jones R, et al. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Dec; 75:(6):936–40.https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31829e20e3
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Saito N, Hito R, Burke PA, Sakai O. Imaging of penetrating injuries of the head and neck: current practice at a level I trauma center in the United States. Keio J Med. 2014; 63:(2):23–33. https://doi.org/10.2302/KJM.2013-0009-RE
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Vishwanatha B, Sagayaraj A, Huddar SG, Kumar P, Datta RK. Penetrating neck injuries. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Sep; 59:(3):221–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/S12070-007-0065-7
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Hussain Zaidi SM, Ahmad R. Penetrating neck trauma: a case for a conservative approach. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec; 32:(6):591–6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2010.09.001
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Siau RTK, Moore A, Ahmed T, Lee MSW, Tostevin P. Management of penetrating neck injuries at a London trauma centre. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul; 270:(7):2123–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2324-9
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgess CA, Dale OT, Almeyda R, Corbridge RJ. An evidence-based review of the assessment and management of penetrating neck trauma. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb; 37:(1):44–52.https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-4486.2011.02422.X
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Madsen AS, Bruce JL, Oosthuizen GV, Bekker W, Smith M, Manchev V, et al. Correlation between the level of the external wound and the internal injury in penetrating neck injury does not favour an initial zonal management approach. BJS Open. 2020 Aug; 4:(4):704–13.https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50282
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Feliciano DV. Penetrating cervical trauma. “Current Concepts in Penetrating Trauma”, IATSIC Symposium, International Surgical Society, Helsinki, Finland, August 25-29, 2013. World J Surg. 2015 Jun; 39:(6):1363–72.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2919-y
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Múnera F, Soto JA, Palacio D, Velez SM, Medina E. Diagnosis of arterial injuries caused by penetrating trauma to the neck: comparison of helical CT angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2000 Aug; 216:(2):356–62.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00jl25356
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Inaba K, Branco BC, Menaker J, Scalea TM, Crane S, DuBose JJ, et al. Evaluation of multidetector computed tomography for penetrating neck injury: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar; 72:(3):576–83; discussion 583–4; quiz 803–4.https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31824badf7
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Madsen AS, Kong VY, Oosthuizen GV, Bruce JL, Laing GL, Clarke DL. Computed tomography angiography is the definitive vascular imaging modality for penetrating neck injury: a South African experience. Scand J Surg. 2018 Mar; 107:(1):23–30.https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496917731187
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Shiroff AM, Gale SC, Martin ND, Marchalik D, Petrov D, Ahmed HM, et al. Penetrating neck trauma: a review of management strategies and discussion of the ‘No Zone’ approach. Am Surg. 2013 Jan; 79:(1):23–9.https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481307900113
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Low GMI, Inaba K, Chouliaras K, Branco B, Lam L, Benjamin E, et al. The use of the anatomic ‘Zones’ of the neck in the assessment of penetrating neck injury. Am Surg. 2014 Oct; 80:(10):970–4.https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481408001013
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Prichayudh S, Choadrachata-Anun J, Sriussadaporn S, Pak-Art R, Sriussadaporn S, Kritayakirana K, et al. Selective management of penetrating neck injuries using “no zone” approach. Injury. 2015 Sep; 46:(9):1720–5.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INJURY.2015.06.019
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Ibraheem K, Wong S, Smith A, Guidry C, McGrew P, McGinness C, et al. Computed tomography angiography in the “no-zone” approach era for penetrating neck trauma: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec; 89:(6):1233–8.https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002919
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Erdfelder E, FAul F, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov; 41:(4):1149–60.https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Brunicardi FC, Andersen Dana K, Billiar Timothy R, Dunn DL, Hunter J, Kao L, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 2 Volume Set, 11th Edition. McGraw Hill Professional, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Roon AJ, Christensen N. Evaluation and treatment of penetrating cervical injuries. J Trauma. 1979 Jun; 19:(6):391–7.https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197906000-00001
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Monson DO, Saletta JD, Freeark RJ. Carotid vertebral trauma. J Trauma. 1969 Dec; 9:(12):987–99.https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-196912000-00003
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Rehse DH, Offner PJ, Franciose RJ, Burch JM. Selective management of penetrating neck trauma based on cervical level of injury. Am J Surg. 1997 Dec; 174:(6):678–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00195-5
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Demetriades D, Theodorou D, Cornwell E, Berne TV, Asensio J, Belzberg H, et al. Evaluation of penetrating injuries of the neck: prospective study of 223 patients. World J Surg. 1997 Jan; 21:(1):41–7; discussion 47–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900191
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Beitsch P, Weigelt JA, Flynn E, Easley S. Physical examination and arteriography in patients with penetrating zone II neck wounds. Arch Surg. 1994 Jun; 129:(6):577–81.https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420300015002
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Atteberry LR, Dennis JW, Menawat SS, Frykberg ER. Physical examination alone is safe and accurate for evaluation of vascular injuries in penetrating zone II neck trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Dec; 179:(6):657–62
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.33
Loading
External wound zone lacks predictive value for internal injury site in penetrating neck trauma: A prospective analysis
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care 2025, 33 (2025); https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2025.33
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.33
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.33
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CT angiography, neck injuries, neck zones, Penetrating neck trauma, surgical exploration and trauma management

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error