1887
Volume 2025, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Emergency medicine is a fast-paced and decision-making environment, critical where ensuring patient safety and care quality is of utmost importance. This review explores the evolving landscape of research methodologies used to improve safety and quality in emergency care, with a specific focus on studies conducted in India and their global implications. We delve into various research approaches, from observational studies that uncover patterns of errors and adverse outcomes to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that test interventions aimed at enhancing safety in emergency departments (EDs). Qualitative research provides more in-depth understanding of the human and organizational factors that influence patient care, whereas mixed-methods research combines quantitative data with qualitative insights, offering a comprehensive view of complex safety challenges. Furthermore, implementation science plays a critical role in translating research findings into practice and ensuring the effective adoption of safety protocols in EDs. Despite the limited number of studies in India, the research conducted in the country highlights unique challenges such as overcrowding and resource constraints, making it essential to adapt global research findings to local contexts. By examining these diverse methodologies and their application in India, this review emphasizes the importance of context-specific solutions to enhance patient safety and care quality in resource-limited settings. The findings have global relevance, offering valuable insights for emergency health professionals committed to improving safety in EDs worldwide. This review aims to inspire further research and collaboration to ensure safer, more efficient emergency care for all patients.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.19
2025-04-23
2025-07-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2025/2/jemtac.2025.19.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.19&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Razzak JA, Kellermann AL. Emergency medical care in developing countries: is it worthwhile? Bull World Health Organ. 2002; 80:(11):900–905. [PubMed]PMC2567674.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Obermeyer Z, Abujaber S, Makar M, Stoll S, Kayden SR, Wallis LA, et al. Emergency care in 59 low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2015; 93:(8):577–586G. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.148338
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011; 104:(12):510–520. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Reynolds TA, Sawe H, Rubiano AM, et al. Strengthening health systems to provide emergency care. In: Jamison DT, Gelband H, Horton S, et al., eds. Disease Control Priorities: Improving Health and Reducing Poverty. 3rd ed.Washington, DCThe International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank2017Chapter 13. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0527-1_ch13
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. Lancet. 2002; 359:(9301):145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07373-7
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003; 20:(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.1.54
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002; 359:(9305):515–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000; 320:(7226):50–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 4th ed.LondonRoutledge2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146027
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sanson-Fisher R. Designing and conducting mixed methods research [review of the book Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, by Creswell JW, Clark VLP]. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007; 31:(4):388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, et al. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003; 289:(2):179–186. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.2.179
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patient Safety and Quality Measures [Internet]. Rockville, MDAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality2023Aug. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/quality-measures/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Amaratunga D, Baldry D. Case study methodology as a means of theory building: Performance measurement in facilities management organisations. Work Study. 2001; 50:(3):95–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020110389227
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pham JC, Story JL, Hicks RW, Shore AD, Morlock LL, Cheung DS, et al. National study on the frequency, types, causes, and consequences of voluntarily reported emergency department medication errors. J Emerg Med. 2011; 40:(5):485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.02.059
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Stang AS, Wingert AS, Hartling L, Plint AC. Error reporting in emergency medicine: A systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 60:(5):519–528.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.03.021
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Carpenter CR, Kaphingst KA, Goodman MS, Lin MJ, Melson AT, Griffey RT. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of brief health literacy and numeracy screening instruments in an urban emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2014; 21:(2):137–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12315
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahler SA, Riley RF, Hiestand BC, Russell GB, Hoekstra JW, Lefebvre CW, et al. The HEART Pathway randomized trial: Identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015; 8:(2):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001384
    [Google Scholar]
  19. White CM, Statile AM, White DL, Elkeeb D, Tucker K, Herzog D, et al. Using quality improvement to optimise paediatric discharge efficiency. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23:(5):428–436. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002556
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Singer SJ, Falwell A, Gaba DM, Meterko M, Rosen A, Hartmann CW, et al. Identifying organizational cultures that promote patient safety. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009; 34:(4):300–311. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181afc10c
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Holden RJ, Scanlon MC, Patel NR, et al. A human factors framework and study of the effect of nursing workload on patient safety and employee quality of working life. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20:(1):15–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Medford-Davis LN, Singh H, Mahajan P. Diagnostic decision-making in the emergency department. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018; 65:(6):1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2018.07.003
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McColl T, Gatien M, Calder L, et al. Implementation of an emergency department sepsis bundle and system redesign: A process improvement initiative. CJEM. 2017; 19:(2):112–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2016.351
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Alsabri M, Boudi Z, Lauque D, et al. Impact of teamwork and communication training interventions on safety culture and patient safety in emergency departments: A systematic review. J Patient Saf. 2022; 18:(1):e351–e361. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000782
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bigham BL, Bull E, Morrison M, et al. Patient safety in emergency medical services: Executive summary and recommendations from the Niagara Summit. CJEM. 2011; 13:(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.2310/8000.2011.100232
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Stang AS, Wingert AS, Hartling L, Plint AC. Adverse events related to emergency department care: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2013; 8:(9):e74214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074214
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Junhasavasdikul D, Theerawit P, Kiatboonsri S. Association between admission delay and adverse outcome of emergency medical patients. Emerg Med J. 2013; 30:(4):320–323. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2011-200788
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Bhatnagar M, Sirohi N, Dubey AB. Prediction of hospital outcome in emergency medical admissions using modified early warning score (MEWS): Indian experience. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021; 10:(1):192–198. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1426_20
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Santhanam I, Bhat BV, Kansal S, et al. Training pediatric emergency medicine specialists in India. Indian Pediatr. 2016; 53:(5):437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0871-7
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T. When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? Int J Public Health. 2008; 53:(3):165–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-008-7068-3
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaptchuk TJ. The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: Gold standard or golden calf? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54:(6):541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00347-4
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Grossman J, Mackenzie FJ. The randomized controlled trial: Gold standard, or merely standard? Perspect Biol Med. 2005; 48:(4):516–534. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2005.0092
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FLUniversity of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Narne Akhil, Thomas PP, D R SD, Thomas SM, Londhe SP. Assessment, evaluation and analysis of the medication errors of the patients admitted at the emergency department of a tertiary care teaching hospital of a South Indian city. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017; 10:(5):161–165. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i5.17170
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sodhi K, Khasne RW, Chanchalani G, et al. Practice patterns and management protocols in trauma across Indian settings: A nationwide cross-sectional survey. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023; 27:(1):38–51. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24388
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Verman S, Anjankar A. A narrative review of adverse event detection, monitoring, and prevention in Indian hospitals. Cureus. 2022; 14:(9):e29162. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29162
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Khudadad U, Aftab W, Ali A, et al. Perception of the healthcare professionals towards the current trauma and emergency care system in Kabul, Afghanistan: A mixed method study. Int J Emerg Med. 2020; 13:(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-00300-3
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Davey K, Jacob S, Prasad N, et al. Characteristics and expectations among emergency department patients in India. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022; 2:(2):e0000009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000009
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Darraj A, Hudays A, Hazazi A, et al. The association between emergency department overcrowding and delay in treatment: A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11:(3):385. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030385
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Meyer GD, Meyer TN, Gaunt CB. Validity of the South African Triage Scale in a rural district hospital. Afr J Emerg Med. 2018; 8:(4):145-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.07.004
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Agarwal N, Jain P, Pathak R, Gupta R. Telemedicine in India: A tool for transforming health care in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. J Educ Health Promot. 2020; 9:190. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_470_20
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Newton AS, Hartling L, Soleimani A, Kirkland SW, Dyson MP. A systematic review of quality improvement interventions aimed at reducing pediatric emergency department utilization. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017; 33:(9):644-651. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000611
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kumar S, Singh S, Deep R. Mental and behavioural emergencies at a tertiary healthcare centre in India: Pattern and profile. Natl Med J India. 2018; 31:339-342.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Gausche-Hill M, Ely M, Schmuhl P, et al. A national assessment of pediatric readiness of emergency departments. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169:(6):527-534. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.138
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Satapathy S. Mental health impacts of disasters in India: Ex-ante and ex-post analysis. In: Sawada Y, Oum S, eds. Economic and Welfare Impacts of Disasters in East Asia and Policy Responses. JakartaERIA2012:425-461.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Cheng A, Auerbach M, Hunt EA, et al. Designing and conducting simulation-based research. Pediatrics. 2014; 133:(6):1091-1101. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3267
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Avram R, Tison GH, Aschbacher K, et al. Real-world heart rate norms in the Health eHeart study. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0134-9
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: A systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013; 10:(1):e1001362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomlinson M, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Swartz L, Tsai AC. Scaling up mHealth: Where is the evidence? PLoS Med. 2013; 10:(2):e1001382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001382
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.19
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.19
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error