1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care
  4. Volume 2023, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 2023, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Airway management is one of the most vital skills used by advanced airway providers. Anticipating a difficult airway is crucial for the risk-benefit analysis and may help providers to determine the optimal airway management approach. Existing difficult airway assessment tools may have limited application in emergency airway management. In addition, these do not incorporate physiological factors. More recently, Davis and Olvera proposed the HEAVEN criteria as a novel difficult airway predictive tool for emergency airway management. The objective of this study is to review HEAVEN as a novel airway prediction tool.

This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results of a comprehensive search in three major databases, as well as hand searching, were screened in title/abstract and full-text stages. We included the journal articles which review HEAVEN as a novel airway prediction tool with both retrospective and prospective study designs. The population included patients requiring rapid sequence intubation (RSI) or delayed sequence intubation (DSI). Two investigators independently extracted the data with an electronic table in Microsoft Word. Due to the heterogeneity in included study designs, settings, methods, study outcomes, and measurement of the studies, we did not carry out a meta-analysis. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Out of 103 records, only four studies were included. The most cited criterion was the anatomical challenge, which was significantly associated with first-attempt success in three studies. Most studies on HEAVEN did not support physiological factors as predictors of difficult intubation. Two studies reported significant associations between individual HEAVEN criteria and first-attempt success without desaturation. Some included studies reported significant associations between anatomical HEAVEN criteria (extremes of size, anatomical challenge, vomit/blood/fluid, and neck mobility) and difficult airway view. Furthermore, a prospective study reported that hypoxemia and vomit/blood/fluid were significantly associated with intubation complications. Based on the results of the RoB analysis, there wasn’t considerable bias in a great number of included studies.

The HEAVEN criteria may represent a development over the traditional approaches. HEAVEN assessment tool considers both physiological and anatomical factors. In addition, all HEAVEN elements can be performed in emergent situations. The HEAVEN criteria seem to be a useful tool to predict difficult airways. There was a variation among studies in the definition of the difficult airway. There is currently no consensus on the definition of a difficult airway, which may explain some of the heterogeneity of the results of this systematic review. Due to the heterogeneity in included studies, we did not carry out a meta-analysis. Therefore, we suggested that future studies should consider homogeneous patient populations, a uniform study design, a matching study setting, and a widely accepted definition of the difficult airway to provide the opportunity to perform meta-analyses. The controversial results of studies highlighted a requirement for more prospective studies with an appropriate study design and considering the possible confounding factors to reach more reliable evidence.

© 2022 Abbasgholizadeh, Vahdati, Pouraghaei, Afsar, Hanifeh, licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2023.5
2023-01-19
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2023/1/jemtac.2023.5.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2023.5&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Walls RM, Murphy MF. Manual of emergency airway management. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Schwartz DE, Matthay MA, Cohen NH. Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82:(2):367–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Reed MJ, Rennie LM, Dunn MJ, Gray AJ, Robertson CE, McKeown DW. Is the ‘LEMON’ method an easily applied emergency airway assessment tool? Eur J Emerg Med. 2004; 11:(3):154–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Nausheen F, Niknafs NP, MacLean DJ, Olvera DJ, Wolfe AC, Jr., Pennington TW, et al. The HEAVEN criteria predict laryngoscopic view and intubation success for both direct and video laryngoscopy: a cohort analysis. Scand J Trauma, Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27:(1):50.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Tan NE, Yoong KPY, Yahya HMF. Use of HEAVEN criteria for predicting difficult intubation in the emergency department. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022; 9:(1):29–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Reed MJ, Dunn MJ, McKeown DW. Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J. 2005; 22:(2):99–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Mosier JM, Joshi R, Hypes C, Pacheco G, Valenzuela T, Sakles JC. The physiologically difficult airway. West J Emerg Med. 2015; 16:(7):1109–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. De Jong A, Molinari N, Terzi N, Mongardon N, Arnal JM, Guitton C, et al. Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 187:(8):832–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis DP, Olvera DJ. HEAVEN criteria: Derivation of a new difficult airway prediction tool. Air Med J. 2017; 36:(4):195–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuzmack E, Inglis T, Olvera D, Wolfe A, Seng K, Davis D. A novel difficult-airway prediction tool for emergency airway management: Validation of the HEAVEN criteria in a large air medical cohort. J Emerg Med. 2018; 54:(4):395–401.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar; 372::n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Sideri S, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 100::103–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Booth A. Unpacking your literature search toolbox: on search styles and tactics. Health Info Libr J. 2008; 25:(4):313–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, Chiba T, Watase H, Brown CA 3rd, et al. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60:(6):749–54.e2.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Okamoto H, Goto T, Hasegawa K. Prospective validation of the modified LEMON criteria to predict difficult intubation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33:(10):1492–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Honarmand A, Safavi M, Yaraghi A, Attari M, Khazaei M, Zamani M. Comparison of five methods in predicting difficult laryngoscopy: Neck circumference, neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio, the ratio of height to thyromental distance, upper lip bite test and Mallampati test. Adv Biomed Res. 2015; 4::122.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Grimes D, MacLeod I, Taylor T, O’Connor M, Sidebottom A. Computed tomography as an aid to planning intubation in the difficult airway. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54:(1):80–2.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Pinto J, Cordeiro L, Pereira C, Gama R, Fernandes HL, Assunção J. Predicting difficult laryngoscopy using ultrasound measurement of distance from skin to epiglottis. J Crit Care. 2016; 33::26–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Soyuncu S, Eken C, Cete Y, Bektas F, Akcimen M. Determination of difficult intubation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2009; 27:(8):905–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Badheka JP, Doshi PM, Vyas AM, Kacha NJ, Parmar VS. Comparison of upper lip bite test and ratio of height to thyromental distance with other airway assessment tests for predicting difficult endotracheal intubation. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016; 20:(1):3–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Henschell RD, Miller PK. The use of HEAVEN criteria to predict difficult laryngeal view and intubation failure with direct and video laryngoscopy. Scand J Trauma, Resusc Emerg Med. 2020; 28:(1):111.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Joshi R, Hypes CD, Greenberg J, Snyder L, Malo J, Bloom JW, et al. Difficult airway characteristics associated with first-attempt failure at intubation using video laryngoscopy in the intensive care unit. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017; 14:(3):368–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Henschell R, Miller P. A novel difficult-airway prediction tool for emergency airway management: Validation of the HEAVEN criteria in a large air medical cohort. J Emerg Med. 2021; 60:(3):407–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Brown CA 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Laurin EG, Walls RM. Improved glottic exposure with the Video Macintosh Laryngoscope in adult emergency department tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56:(2):83–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116:(3):629–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sakles JC, Patanwala AE, Mosier JM, Dicken JM. Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med. 2014; 9:(1):93–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Giles S, Routledge H, Gao F. Do changes in pulse oximeter oxygen saturation predict equivalent changes in arterial oxygen saturation? Crit Care. 2003; 7:(4):R67.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Bodily JB, Webb HR, Weiss SJ, Braude DA. Incidence and duration of continuously measured oxygen desaturation during emergency department intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 67:(3):389–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99:(2):607–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Heffner AC, Swords DS, Neale MN, Jones AE. Incidence and factors associated with cardiac arrest complicating emergency airway management. Resuscitation. 2013; 84:(11):1500–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Shao LJ, Liu SH, Xue FS. The use of HEAVEN criteria to predict difficult laryngeal view and intubation failure with direct and video laryngoscopy. Scand J Trauma, Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27:(1):73.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2023.5
Loading
Are the HEAVEN criteria reliable as a predictive tool for emergency airway management? A systematic review
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care 2023, 5 (2023); https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2023.5
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2023.5
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2023.5
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): airway management, difficult airway assessment tools and HEAVEN criteria

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error