1887
Volume 2026, Issue 1
  • EISSN: 2223-506X

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices in riverine and non-riverine communities within Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Despite ambitious institutional frameworks, public health remains threatened by inadequate infrastructure and deep-seated cultural resistance to modern sanitation. Adopting a mixed-methods research design, data were gathered through 400 structured questionnaires, focus group discussions, and field observations across 30 purposively selected settlements. The sampling frame included educational institutions, commercial hubs, and fishing settlements. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative insights were coded thematically. Findings reveal a significant disparity in infrastructure; riverine communities reported substantially lower access to sanitary facilities (primarily due to flooding risks and temporary housing) compared to non-riverine areas, which benefited from higher—though still insufficient—private sector investment. Data indicated that only 37.5% of households across both regions possess private toilets, and 60% lack a consistent borehole water supply. Utilisation was particularly low in public spaces; universities and marketplaces exhibited severe deficiencies, leading to frequent instances of open defecation. These practices were often justified by long-standing cultural beliefs, such as the perception that faecal matter serves as aquatic nutrients in coastal zones or that contaminated water poses no threat to indigenous populations due to their inherently strong immune system. The study concludes that the gap between WASH policy and practice is widened by inadequate budget allocation and a lack of private-sector commitment. It is recommended that the Akwa Ibom State Government enforce a “WASH Private Sector Blueprint” and prioritise infrastructure development and behavioural sensitisation in schools, markets, and geographically disadvantaged riverine terrains to improve regional public health outcomes.

© 2026 Author(s), licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2026.3
2026-01-27
2026-01-27

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/connect/2026/1/connect.2026.issue1.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2026.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abraham CM, Ansa I, Jimmy UJ, Osogi MA, Udoh IJ, Idika CK, et al. Contributions of community-based natural resources in socio-economic development of indigenous coastal dwellers in Odukpani, Cross River State, Nigeria. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2025; 10:(4):145–154. doi: 10.36348/sjhss.2025.v10i04.003
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Akpabio EM, Rowan JS. Water, sanitation, and health: progress and obstacles to achieving the SDGs. In: Ferrier RC, Jenkins A. (eds.) Handbook of catchment management. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Blackwell; 2021. p. 270–307. doi: 10.1002/9781119531241.ch11
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Akpabio EM, Mwathunga E, Rowan JS. Understanding the challenges governing Malawi’s water, sanitation and hygiene sector. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2022; 38:(3):426–446. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2021.1897947
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Akpabio EM, Rowan JS. The political economy of coordinating water, sanitation and hygiene management policies and programmes for Nigeria. Water International. 2021; 46:(3):365–382. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2020.1867454
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Akpabio EM. Water meanings, sanitation practices and hygiene behaviours in the cultural mirror: a perspective from Nigeria. Journal of Water, Sanitation & Hygiene for Development. 2012; 2:(3):168–181. doi: 10.2166/washdev.2012.073
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Akpabio EM. Water supply and sanitation services sector in Nigeria: the policy trend and practice constraints. ZEF Working Paper Series No. 96. Bonn: ZEF; 2012.
  7. Achiro B. Constraints and prospects of law enforcement for improved sanitation in Kawempe Division, Kampala District. MSc dissertation. Kampala: Makerere University; 2009.
  8. Adogu P, Uwakwe K, Egenti N, Okwuoha A, Nkwocha I. Assessment of waste management practices among residents of Owerri Municipal, Imo State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2015; 6:(5):446–456. doi: 10.4236/jep.2015.65043
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Akpabio E, Udofia E. Unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene in Nigeria’s public spaces: the political economy angle. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2017; 33:(2):310–325. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1189814
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Akpabio E, Udom E. ‘Borehole race’ and the dilemma of governing the ‘ungoverned’: understanding the urban political ecology of groundwater exploitation in Nigeria. Society & Natural Resources. 2018; 31:(9):1030–1044. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1475586
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ansa IE. Private sector involvement in water management in Nigeria: analysis of performance and challenges in states of South-South. Doctoral thesis. Uyo: University of Uyo; 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Beckedorf A. Political waters. Governmental water management and neoliberal reforms in Khartoum/Sudan. Forum Politische Geographie. 2010;7:298.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bassey SA. The politics of safe water delivery in Nigeria. Paper presented at the Environmental Parliament Programme; 2003; Uyo Nigeria.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Budds J, McGranahan G. Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Environment & Urbanization. 2003; 15:(2):87–113. doi: 10.1177/095624780301500222
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Daniel MN. Access to pipe-borne water in Kaduna South Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Unpublished master’s thesis. Zaria: Ahmadu Bello University; 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekane N, Nykvist B, Kjellén M, Noel S, Weitz N. Multi-level sanitation governance: understanding and overcoming the challenges in the sanitation sector in sub-Saharan Africa. Working Paper No. 2014–4. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute; 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Engel S, Iskandarani M, Useche M. Improved water supply in Ghanaian Volta Basin: who uses it and who participates in community decision-making?EPT Discussion Paper No. 129. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gunatilake H, Tachiiri M. Willingness to pay and inclusive tariff designs for improved water supply services in Khulna, Bangladesh. ADB South Asia Working Paper Series No. 9. Manila: Asian Development Bank; 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ifabiyi IP. Willingness to pay for water at household level in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Human-Social Science. 2011;11:15–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Imoh U, Abraham CM, Udoh WM, Udofia N, Jimmy UJ. Forest resources extraction, indigenous livelihood and sustainability dilemma in tropical Africa: case study of Akwa Ibom State. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2025; 10:(4):155–162. doi: 10.36348/sjhss.2025.v10i04.004
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jimmy UJ, Osogi MA, Inwang SE, Udofia UO, Akpan JW, Tabash MI, et al. Blue resources under-exploitation and development impediment along Atlantic coastline: example from Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2025; 10:(4):131–144. doi: 10.36348/sjhss.2025.v10i04.002
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Karol P. The privatised water industry in the UK: an ATM for investors. London: Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich; 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nellis J. Privatization in Latin America. Working Paper No. 31. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development; 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Sadiq QO, Ezeamaka CK, Daful MG, Anjide TW, Sani H, Ogbole M. Environmental sanitation practices in Kuchigworo and Garamajiji along Airport Road, Abuja. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning. 2018; 11:(11):172–182. doi: 10.5897/JGRP2018.0711
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. Drinking water, sanitation and hygiene in schools: global baseline report. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  26. Hutton G, Varughese M. The costs of achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal targets for water and sanitation. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jenkins M, Scott B. Behavioral indicators of household water security and hygiene practices: the roles of culture and context. Waterlines. 2007; 26:(1):12–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Satterthwaite D. Climate change and the world’s poorest: where the greatest impacts and largest adaptation needs are likely to arise. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2019; 10:(5):e609.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. UNICEF. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) strategy 2016–2030. New York: UNICEF; 2020. .
  30. UNICEF Nigeria . Water, sanitation and hygiene. Abuja: UNICEF; 2024.
  31. World Health Organization. Guidelines on sanitation and health. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  32. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2022. Geneva: WHO; 2023.
  33. World Bank. The global water and sanitation crisis: what is the World Bank doing? Washington, DC: World Bank; 2021.
  34. Yarima SA, Maishanu SZ, Yarima UA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of users towards water usage in IUIU Main Campus, Mbale. International Journal of Health and Pharmaceutical Research. 2021; 6:(2):44–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hagan GP. Water and spirituality in some African cultures and traditions. In: Water, the world’s common good: a spiritual perspective. Vatican City: Pontifical Council for Culture; 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Marwan A. Public attitudes towards socio-cultural aspects of water supply and sanitation services: Palestine as a case study. Journal of Environmental Management. 2005; 76:(2):155–164.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Igbokwe JE, Oduwaiye AM. Assessing the effects of inadequate sanitary facilities and wastewater management on urban transport infrastructure in Port Harcourt Metropolis. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research. 2025; 11:(4):1017–1026. doi: 10.51193/IJAER.2025.11407
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Abdulkadir H, Usman AK, Abdullahi AH. Analysis of open defecation sites and public–private conveniences in Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. FUDMA Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences. 2024; 1:(2):71–81. doi: 10.33003/jees.2024.0102/07
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Olagbemide A, Oluropo O. Open defecation, causes, consequences and intervention in Nigeria. ABUAD International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 2025; 5:(1):47–57. doi: 10.53982/aijnas.2025.0501.06-j
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Prince-Edward OR. A review of the impact of open defecation on Nigeria’s water, sanitation and hygiene. International Journal of Epidemiology and Health Sciences. 2025;6:e724810. doi: 10.51757/IJEHS.6.2025.724810
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Amare D, Taye A, Hailemariam M, Getahun T. Water, sanitation, and hygiene service inequalities and their associated factors among urban slums and rural communities in Eastern Ethiopia. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024;12:1438748. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438748
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hillesland, M., & Doss, C. Singl. female-headed households and the jointness of water, sanitation and hygiene decisions in Ghana. World Development. 2024; 175;:106478. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106478
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2026.3
Loading
Access to WASH in Nigeria: A Comparative Analysis of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in Riverine and Non-Riverine Communities of Akwa Ibom State
QScience Connect 2026, 3 (2026); https://doi.org/10.5339/connect.2026.3
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2026.3
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2026.3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): WASH, riverine communities, sanitation, public health, Akwa Ibom State, open defecation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error