1887
Volume 2025, Issue 2
  • EISSN: 2223-506X

Abstract

This investigation aims to identify the successful use of nudging theory to enhance sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Qatar, with emphasis on energy sustainability, the transformation of public policy, and effective community participation. The research examines how the findings of nudging strategies can be applied to Qatar’s policy landscape to solve sustainability issues. Using an interpretivist epistemology, the study adopts a qualitative research approach with a subjectivist ontology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants who work in or are affiliated with government and/or academic institutions, and their interviews addressed their understanding of the theory behind nudging and the policies that incorporate it. Subsequently, thematic analysis was carried out throughout and within the different sections of the studies as we searched for patterns that relate to the objectives of this study through the MAXQDA. The findings show that the theory of nudge has a strong impact on the sustainable development policies of Qatar. Some themes are the integration of ecological nudging techniques, psychological factors in policy implementation, and the transformation of public policy systems. When asked about the key enablers for delivering nudges, the respondents identified leadership, community involvement, promotion of knowledge regarding nudging, and leveraging technology. However, the following shortcomings were reported by the respondents: lack of funds, inadequate knowledge, and resistance to change. Several limitations surround the study, including the fact that it was qualitative research work done on a small sample frame. Research in the future may involve the use of quantitative research designs to determine the effectiveness of the nudging strategies over time. Public authorities must incorporate interventions of sustainability into policies, and exploiting nudge techniques can help them to develop efficient, cost-oriented, and culturally tailored programs. The study reveals the necessity of partnerships between the government and other agencies, the private sector, and communities to address sustainability issues.

© 2025 The Author(s), licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.6
2025-10-27
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/connect/2025/2/connect.2025.issue2.6.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.6&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Swart K, Thawadi OA. Rising to the occasion: Qatar’s pandemic experience. Journal of Arabian Studies. 2023;13:(1):110–130. doi: 10.1080/21534764.2024.2383694
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Cochrane L, Al-Hababi R. Sustainable Qatar. In: Cochrane, L., Al-Hababi, R. (eds.) Sustainable Qatar. Gulf studies. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p.1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7398-7_1
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Zaghmout B. Sustainable urban tourism development in Doha: balancing economic growth and environmental stewardship. Research Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2024;3:(1):31–50. doi: 10.52589/rjhtm-ngqvtb4o
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Stieglitz S, Mirbabaie M, Deubel A, Braun LM, Kissmer T. The potential of digital nudging to bridge the gap between environmental attitude and behavior in the usage of smart home applications. International Journal of Information Management. 2023;72:102665. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102665
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar N. Saudi Arabia’s “Vision 2030”: structural reforms and their challenges. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2023;16:(4):92. doi: 10.5539/jsd.v16n4p92
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Amin H, Sakbani K, Tok E. State aspirations for social and cultural transformations in Qatar. Social Sciences. 2024;13:(7):359. doi: 10.3390/socsci13070359
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Muftah HA. Demographic policies and human capital challenges. In: Tok ME, Alkhater LRM, Pal LA (eds.) Policy-making in a transformative state. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2016. p.271–294. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-46639-6_10
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlsson F, Gravert C, Johansson-Stenman O, Kurz V. The use of green nudges as an environmental policy instrument. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2021;15:(2):216–237. doi: 10.1086/715524
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Houdek P. Nudging in organizations: how to avoid behavioral interventions being just a façade. Journal of Business Research. 2024; 182:114781. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114781
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Buratto A, Lotti L. Encouraging sustainable food consumption through nudges: an experiment with menu labels. Ecological Economics. 2023;216:108024. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108024
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Congiu L, Moscati I. A review of nudges: definitions, justifications, effectiveness. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2021;36:(1):188–213. doi: 10.1111/joes.12453
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Weijers RJ, De Koning BB, Klatter E, Paas F. How do teachers in vocational and higher education nudge their students? A qualitative study. European Journal of Higher Education. 2025;15:282–300. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2024.2319087
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bull F, Simpson P, Abdulla DT, Al-Mohannadi AS. Playing the Long Game: a framework for promoting physical activity through sports mega-events. Doha, Qatar; Qatar Foundation. Word Innovation Summit for Health, 2022 OCT 4 [cited 2025 Sep 29] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373993365_Playing_the_Long_Game_A_Framework_for_Promoting_Physical_Activity_ through_Sports_Mega-Events.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Spanos I, Kucukvar M, Bell TC, Elnimah A, Hamdan H, Meer BA, et al. How FIFA World Cup 2022TM can meet the carbon neutral commitments and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development?: Reflections from the tree nursery project in Qatar. Sustainable Development. 2021;30:(1):203–226. doi: 10.1002/sd.2239
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Amiri B, Jafarian A, Abdi Z. Nudging towards sustainability: a comprehensive review of behavioral approaches to eco-friendly choice. Discover Sustainability. 2024;5:(1):444. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00618-3
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Nasir NNM, Nair NMS, Ahmed NPK. Environmental sustainability and contemporary Islamic society: a Shariah perspective. Asian Academy of Management Journal. 2022;27:(2):211–231. doi: 10.21315/aamj2022.27.2.10
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Moalem RM, Schmidt K. Municipal solid waste management in the interface between commercial and non-commercial repair: lessons from Denmark and Sweden. Cleaner Waste Systems. 2023; 5:100095. doi: 10.1016/j.clwas.2023.100095
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gillies C, Molder HT, Wagemakers A. Health promotion values underlying healthy eating strategies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20:(14):6406. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146406
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kemper F, Wichardt PC. Welfare justifications and responsibility in political decision making - the case of nudging. Critical Policy Studies. 2024;19:57–73. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2024.2324155
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Al-Malki A, Madandola M, Thani SA, Bayram G, Al-Kandari A, Furlan R. Advancing urban mobility in the State of Qatar—Establishing a framework for autonomous vehicles in Doha. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development. 2024;8:(3):3051. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i3.3051
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Al-Shaiba A, Wilson A, Cochrane L. The enablers, opportunities and challenges of electric vehicle adoption in Qatar: a systematic review of the literature and assessment of progress toward transportation transformation targets. PLoS Climate. 2023;2:(9):e0000271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000271
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mertens S, Herberz M, Hahnel UJJ, Brosch T. The effectiveness of nudging: a meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021;119:(1):e2107346118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107346118
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Quigley M. Libertarian paternalism, nudging, and public policy. SSRN Electronic Journal; 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4753473
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ouvrard B, Abildtrup J, Stenger A. Nudging acceptability for wood ash recycling in forests: a choice experiment. Ecological Economics. 2020;177:106748. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106748
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Raineau Y, Giraud-Héraud É, Lecocq S. Social comparison nudges: what actually happens when we are told what others do? Ecological Economics. 2024; 228:108436. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108436
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jayaraj MM, Chandrakala A. Nudging for sustainability: innovative practices in sustainable tourism and public policy. In: Appolloni A, Caracciolo F, Ding Z, Gogas P, Huang G, Nartea G, et al. (eds.) Advances in economics, business and management research. Paris, France: Atlantis Press; 2024. p.973–983. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-374-0_85
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Raman R, Lathabai HH, Nedungadi P. Sustainable development goal 12 and its synergies with other SDGs: identification of key research contributions and policy insights. Discover Sustainability. 2024;5:(1):150. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00289-0
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Shayan NF, Mohabbati-Kalejahi N, Alavi S, Zahed MA. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Sustainability. 2022;14:(3):1222. doi: 10.3390/su14031222
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Geboers L, De Vet E, Rongen FC, Poelman MP. More than the worksite cafeteria: the workplace food environment of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Netherlands. Public Health Nutrition. 2024;27:(1):e137. doi: 10.1017/s1368980024000946
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Al-Swidi AK, Al-Esmael B, Bakri AAKA, Al-Hakimi MA, Benarfa O. Linking corporate social responsibility to sustainability performance: a multicase study approach in Qatari companies. Discover Sustainability. 2024;5:(1):441. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00688-3
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gremm J, Barth J, Fietkiewicz KJ, Stock WG. Qatar in a nutshell. In: Transitioning towards a knowledge society. Cham: Springer eBooks; 2017. p.37–65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71195-9_2
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Al-Musalmani F, Maalouf S. Qatar Foundation: a sustainability innovator. In: Cochrane, L., Al-Hababi, R. (eds.) Sustainable Qatar. Gulf studies. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p.73–92. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7398-7_5
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Klaniecki K, Wuropulos K, Hager CP. Behavior change for sustainable development. In: Leal Filho, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education. Cham: Springer eBooks; 2019. p.85–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_161
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Qatar Foundation. Rewarding waste. Qatar Foundation; 2019 [accessed 2025 Sep 29]. https://www.qf.org.qa/stories/rewarding-waste
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Streimikiene D. Use of nudges for promotion of sustainable energy consumption in households. Contemporary Economics. 2023;17:(1):1–9. doi: 10.5709/ce.1897-9254.495
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kerri BMartino S, Visser M. Behavioural nudges for water conservation in unequal settings: experimental evidence from Cape Town. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2023;121:102852. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102852
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Vella F, Migliore G, Schifani G, Vecchio R. Nudging interventions to foster the reduction of pesticides in viticulture. Insights from Italian winegrowers. Environmental Development. 2025;54:101120. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101120
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Trushna T, Krishnan K, Soni R, Singh S, Kalyanasundaram M, Annerstedt KS, et al. Interventions to promote household waste segregation: a systematic review. Heliyon. 2024;10:(2):e24332. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24332
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Franssens S, Botchway E, De Swart W, Dewitte S. Nudging commuters to increase public transport use: a field experiment in Rotterdam. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:633865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633865
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Macioszek E, Świerk P, Kurek A. The bike-sharing system as an element of enhancing sustainable mobility—a case study based on a city in Poland. Sustainability. 2020;12:(8):3285. doi: 10.3390/su12083285
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Koukouvinos KG, Koukouvinos GK, Chalkiadakis P, Kaminaris SD, Orfanos VA, Rimpas D. Evaluating the performance of smart meters: insights into energy management, dynamic pricing and consumer behavior. Applied Sciences. 2025;15:(2):960. doi: 10.3390/app15020960
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Forberger S, Reisch L, Kampfmann T, Zeeb H. Nudging to move: a scoping review of the use of choice architecture interventions to promote physical activity in the general population. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2019;16:(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0844-z
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Wee SC, Choong WW, Low ST. Can “Nudging” play a role to promote pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Challenges. 2021;5:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100364
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Earthna circular Economy. The circular economy in Qatar 1. Scoping paper [internet]. Doha: 2023: Earthna; 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 30]. https://www.earthna.qa/sites/default/files/inline-files/The%20Circular%20Economy%20in%20Qatar%201%20-%20Full-Report.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Beshears J, Kosowsky H. Nudging: progress to date and future directions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2020;161:3–19. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.09.001
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hariton E, Locascio JJ. Randomised controlled trials – the gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018;125:(13):1716. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15199
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Tzikas A, Koulierakis G, Athanasakis K, Merakou K. Nudging interventions on stair use: a scoping review. Journal of Prevention. 2024;45:685–722. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00790-2
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lent RW. Choice architecture and the potential to nudge career development at scale. Journal of Career Assessment. 2024;33:(4):716–738. doi: 10.1177/10690727241298688
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hortal A. Evidence-based policies, nudge theory and Nancy Cartwright: a search for causal principles. Behavioural Public Policy. 2020;7:(2):333–352. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2020.55
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Nijssen SRR, Pijs M, Van Ewijk A, Müller BCN. Towards more sustainable online consumption: the impact of default and informational nudging on consumers’ choice of delivery mode. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. 2023;11:100135. doi: 10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100135
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Momsen K, Stoerk T. From intention to action: can nudges help consumers to choose renewable energy? Energy Policy. 2014;74:376–382. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.008
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ibrahim M, Mukhalalati B, Alawneh MA, Awaisu A. Qatar National Vision 2030. In: University of the Future: Re-Imagining Research and Higher Education. Doha: Annual Research Forum and Exhibition (QUARFE 2020); 2020. doi: 10.29117/quarfe.2020.0226
  53. Kuyer P, Gordijn B. Nudge in perspective: a systematic literature review on the ethical issues with nudging. Rationality and Society. 2023;35:(2):191–230. doi: 10.1177/10434631231155005
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Al-Hababi R. The evolvement of Qatar’s environmental sustainability policy: the strategies, regulations, and institutions. In: Cochrane, L., Al-Hababi, R. (eds.) Sustainable Qatar. Gulf studies. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p.17–35. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7398-7_2
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Andersen FM, Gunkel PA, Bjerregaard C, Jacobsen HK. Changes in hourly electricity consumption profiles and price elasticities in Denmark 2019-2022. Energy. 2024;308:132798. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132798
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sandhi A, Rosenlund J. Municipal solid waste management in Scandinavia and key factors for improved waste segregation: a review. Cleaner Waste Systems. 2024;8:100144. doi: 10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100144
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Meeusen REH, Van Der Voorn B, Berk KA. Nudging strategies to improve food choices of healthcare workers in the workplace cafeteria: a pragmatic field study. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2022;53:126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.11.022
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Diop A, Al-Emadi A, Kaplanidou K, Sagas M, Elmaghraby E, Qutteina Y. Examining the cross-cultural attitudes of Qataris and expatriates in Qatar, the host country of 2022 World Cup. International Journal of Event and Festival Management. 2018;9:(3):266–278. doi: 10.1108/ijefm-09-2017-0058
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Behavioral Sciences Team The Behavioral Sciences Team Annual Report (FY 2017 and FY 2018); 2019 . [accessed 2025 Sep 30], https://www.env.go.jp/content/900447991.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Halpern D, Sanders M. Nudging by government: progress, impact, & lessons learned. Behavioral Science & Policy. 2016;2:(2):53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946151600200206
     [Google Scholar]
  61. The White House. FACT SHEET: new progress on using behavioral science insights to better serve the American people. Whitehouse. gov; 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/15/fact-sheet-new-progress-using-behavioral-science-insights-better-serve
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Mele C, Spena TR, Kaartemo V, Marzullo ML. Smart nudging: how cognitive technologies enable choice architectures for value cocreation. Journal of Business Research. 2020;129:949–960. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.004
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Ofem OE. Ethical dimensions and decision-making dynamics: a meta-synthesis of Ai nudging across sectors. SSRN Electronic Journal; 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5029845
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Mamede A, Noordzij G, Jongerling J, Snijders M, Schop-Etman A, Denktas S. Combining Web-Based gamification and physical nudges with an app (MoveMore) to promote walking breaks and reduce sedentary behavior of office workers: field study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23:(4):e19875. doi: 10.2196/19875
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3:(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Sarrakh R, Renukappa S, Suresh S. Evaluation of challenges for sustainable transformation of Qatar oil and gas industry: a graph theoretic and matrix approach. Energy Policy. 2022;162:112766. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112766
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Elder J, Serletis A. Oil price uncertainty. Journal of Money Credit and Banking. 2010;42:(6):1137–1159. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2010.00323.x
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Al-Thani WA, Ari I, Koç M. Education as a critical factor of sustainability: case study in Qatar from the teachers’ development perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13:(20):11525. doi: 10.3390/su132011525
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Axelsson K, André K, Dawkins E, Swartling ÅG, Xylia M. Transitioning toward sustainable consumption at the Swedish local governance level. Frontiers in Sustainability. 2023;4:1196373. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2023.1196373
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Weijers RJ, Claessens IWH, Gillebaart M, De Ridder DTD. Nudging towards sustainable dining: exploring menu nudges to promote vegetarian meal choices in restaurants. Appetite. 2024;198:107376. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107376
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Mosca O, Manunza A, Manca S, Vivanet G, Fornara F. Digital technologies for behavioral change in sustainability domains: a systematic mapping review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024;14:1234349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1234349
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Ariansyah A, Prayogi S, Kurnia N, Bilad MR, Sutarto S. Digital technology to support sustainable development goals (SDGs): literature review. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika. 2024;12:(2):315. doi: 10.33394/j-lkf.v12i2.13557
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Rana A, Sadiq R, Alam MS, Karunathilake H, Hewage K. Evaluation of financial incentives for green buildings in Canadian landscape. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;135:110199. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110199
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Petersson C, Nygårdh A, Hedberg B. To support self-management for people with long-term conditions – The effect on shared decision-making, empowerment and coping after participating in group-learning sessions. Nursing Open. 2022;9:(5):2444–2453. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1261
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.6
Loading
Applying Nudge Theory to Foster Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Qatar
QScience Connect 2025, 6 (2025); https://doi.org/10.5339/connect.2025.6
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.6
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.6
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ecological nudges, energy sustainability, Nudging theory, policy change, Qatar and SDG

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error