1887
Volume 2025, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • E-ISSN: 2227-0426

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of cemented collared composite beam (CB) and collarless taper slip (TS) femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Four databases were searched from inception to August 2023 for original studies that compared the outcomes of cemented CB and TS femoral stems following THA. The primary outcome was aseptic loosening, and the secondary outcomes were periprosthetic fractures, instability, dislocation, revision, survivorship, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

A total of 11 studies with 730,769 hips were included, with a mean follow-up period of 8.48 ± 6.07 years and average MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) score of 17.36 ± 1.86. There was a statistically significant difference in aseptic loosening (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.19–0.43,  < 0.001) and PJI rate (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.71,  < 0.001) between the CB and TS groups in favor of the latter. However, periprosthetic fracture, revision rate, survivorship, instability, and dislocation were similar in both groups (  =  NS).

This study showed a significantly higher aseptic loosening and PJI in the CB group compared to the TS stem type. However, other outcomes were comparable. Due to confounding effects, these results must be interpreted in context.

© 2025 Salman, Khatkar, Derbas, Radi, AlSamhori, Al-Atout, Alzoubi, Ahmed, licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

جارٍ تحميل قياسات المقالة...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.20
٢٠٢٥-٠٣-١٧
٢٠٢٥-١٢-١٣

القياسات

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qmj/2025/1/qmj.2025.20.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.20&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. American Join. Replacement Registry (AJRR): 2022 Annual Report. Rosemont, IL: America Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). [online]. 2022. [Accessed 1 June 2023]. Available from: https://www.aaos.org/registries/publications/ajrr-annual-report/.
  2. Registry NJ. National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report. [online]. 2020. [Accessed 1 June 2023]. Available from: https://www.njrcentre.org.uk .
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  3. Salman LA, Ahmed G, Dakin SG, Kendrick B, Price A. Osteoarthritis: a narrative review of molecular approaches to disease management. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Feb 18; 25:(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03006-w.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  4. Hussein IH, Zalikha AK, Tuluca A, Crespi Z, El-Othmani MM. Epidemiology of obese patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty: understanding demographics, comorbidities, and propensity weighted analysis of inpatient outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Feb 16; 6:(2):e21.00263. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00263.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  5. Scheerlinck T, Casteleyn PP. The design features of cemented femoral hip implants. Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Nov; 88:(11):1409–1418. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17836.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  6. Kazi HA, Whitehouse SL, Howell JR, Timperley AJ. Not all cemented hips are the same: a register-based (NJR) comparison of taper-slip and composite beam femoral stems. Acta Orthop. 2019 May 6; 90:(3):214–219. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1582680.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  7. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesæter LB, Havelin LI. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop. 2009 Aug 1; 80:(4):402–412. doi: 10.3109/17453670903161124.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  8. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. JBJS. 2002 Feb 1; 84:(2):171–177.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  9. Ling RS, Charity J, Lee AC, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ, Gie GA. The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun 1; 24:(4):511–517. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.002.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  10. Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJ, Timperley AJ, Howell JR, Wilson MJ. The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up: the first 540 cases. Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug 1; 100-B:(8):1002–1009. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1535.R1.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISM. Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: V the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18; 151:(4):264–269, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  12. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): Development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep; 73:(9):712–716. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  13. Furnes O, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. Exeter and Charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement: Comparison of 1, 127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997 Dec; 68:(6):515–520. doi: 10.3109/17453679708999017.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  14. Cook RE, Jenkins PJ, Walmsley PJ, Patton JT, Robinson CM. Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 May 10; 466:(7):1652–1656. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0289-1.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  15. Junnila M, Laaksonen I, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Ivar Havelin L, Furnes O, et al. Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug 22; 87:(6):546–553. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1222804.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  16. Palan J, Smith MC, Gregg P, Mellon S, Kulkarni A, Tucker K, et al. The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data. Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct; 98-B:(10):1347–1354. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36534.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  17. Scott T, Salvatore A, Woo P, Lee YY, Salvati EA, Della Vall AG. Polished, collarless, tapered, cemented stems for primary hip arthroplasty may exhibit high rate of periprosthetic fracture at short-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr; 33:(4):1120–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.003.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  18. Jain S, Farook MZ, Aslam-Pervez N, Amer M, Martin DH, Unnithan A, et al. A multicentre comparative analysis of fixation versus revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with a cemented polished taper-slip femoral component. Bone Joint J. 2023 Feb; 105-B:(2):124–134. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2022-0685.R1.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  19. Rames RD, Smartt AA, Abdel MP, Mabry TM, Berry DJ, Sierra RJ. Collarless taper slip and collared composite beam stems differ in failure modes and reoperation rates. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul; 37:(7S):S598–S603. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.039.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  20. Heijnens LJ, Heyligers IC, Boonen B, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, van Haaren EH, Schotanus MG. Survival rates of anatomically shaped and tapered slip cemented femoral implants: an analysis of 76,281 femoral implants of the Dutch arthroplasty register (LROI). Hip Int. 2023 Nov; 33:(6):1035–1042. doi: 10.1177/11207000221145150.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  21. White-Gibson A, Sheridan GA, Ghetti AC, Keogh P, Kenny P, Cashman JP. The utility of cemented femoral stems in modern THA: a 10-year comparative analysis of the Charnley and Exeter stems. Irish J Med Sci. 2024 Feb; 193:(1):251–255. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03381-y.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  22. Jayasuriya RL, Buckley SC, Hamer AJ, Kerry RM, Stockley I, Tomouk MW, et al. Effect of sliding-taper compared with composite-beam cemented femoral prosthesis loading regime on proximal femoral bone remodeling: a randomized clinical trial. JBJS, 2013 Jan 2; 95:(1):19–27. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00657.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  23. Whitehouse SL, Bolland BJRF, Howell JR, Crawford RW, Timperley AJ. Mortality following hip arthroplasty–inappropriate use of National Joint Registry (NJR) data. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep; 29:(9):1827–1834. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.022.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  24. Farrow L, Evans J. Future registry research: database linkage in Trauma and Orthopaedics. Bone Joint Res. 2023 Apr 3; 12:(4):256–258. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.124.BJR-2023-0072.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  25. Emara AK, Ng M, Krebs VE, Bloomfield M, Molloy RM, Piuzzi NS. Femoral stem cementation in hip arthroplasty: the know-how of a “lost” art. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Feb; 14:(1):47–59. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09681-5.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  26. Kärrholm J, Nivbrant B, Thanner J, Anderberg C, Börlin N, Herberts P, et al. Radiostereometric evaluation of hip implant design and surface finish: micromotion of cemented femoral stems [online]. 2000. Available from: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn = urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-40148.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  27. Kärrholm J. Radiostereometric analysis of early implant migration – a valuable tool to ensure proper introduction of new implants. Acta Orthop. 2012 Nov 26; 83:(6):551–552. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745352.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  28. Inngul C, Enocson A. Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome. Int Orthop. 2015 Sep; 39:(9):1683-1688. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2570-0.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  29. Kristensen TB, Dybvik E, Furnes O, Engesæter LB, Gjertsen JE. More reoperations for periprosthetic fracture after cemented hemiarthroplasty with polished taper-slip stems than after anatomical and straight stems in the treatment of hip fractures: a study from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2005 to 2016. Bone Joint J. 2018 Dec; 100-B:(12):1565–1571. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B12.BJJ-2018-0262.R1.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  30. Maggs JL, Swanton E, Whitehouse SL, Howell JR, Timperley AJ, Hubble MJ, et al. B2 or not B2? That is the question: a review of periprosthetic fractures around cemented taper-slip femoral components. Bone Joint J. 2021 Jan; 103-B:(1):71–78. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0163.R1.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  31. Baryeh K, Sochart DH. Post-operative peri-prosthetic fracture rates following the use of cemented polished taper-slip stems for primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec; 142:(12):4075–4085. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04302-3.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  32. Mohammed J, Mukka S, Hedbeck CJ, Chammout G, Gordon M, Sköldenberg O. Reduced periprosthetic fracture rate when changing from a tapered polished stem to an anatomical stem for cemented hip arthroplasty: an observational prospective cohort study with a follow-up of 2 years. Acta Orthop. 2019 Oct; 90:(5):427–432. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1624339.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  33. Mellner C, Mohammed J, Larsson M, Esberg S, Szymanski M, Hellström N, et al. Increased risk for postoperative periprosthetic fracture in hip fracture patients with the Exeter stem than the anatomic SP2 Lubinus stem. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun; 47:(3):803–809. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01263-6.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  34. Lenguerrand E, Whitehouse MR, Beswick AD, Kunutsor SK, Burston B, Porter M, et al. Risk factors associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection after hip replacement: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Sep; 18:(9):1004–1014. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30345-1.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  35. Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Apr; 27:(2):302–345. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-13.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  36. Salman LA, Alzobi OZ, Al-Ani A, Hantouly AT, Al-Juboori M, Ahmed G. The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of hip versus osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul 6; 34:(1):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03635-6.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  37. Salman LA, Hantouly AT, Khatkar H, Al-Ani A, Abudalou A, Al-Juboori M, et al. The outcomes of total hip replacement in osteonecrosis versus osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2023 Mar 11; 47:(12):3043–3052. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05761-6.
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.20
Loading
Outcomes of cemented taper slip versus composite beam femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Qatar Medical Journal 2025, 20 (٢٠٢٥); https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2025.20
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.20
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2025.20
Loading

جارٍ تحميل البيانات والوسائط...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

  • نوع المستند: Review Article
الموضوعات الرئيسية Charnley, composite beam, Exeter, taper slip and Total hip arthroplasty

الأكثر اقتباسًا لهذا الشهر Most Cited RSS feed

هذه الخانة مطلوبة
يُرجى إدخال عنوان بريد إلكتروني صالح
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error