1887
Volume 2025, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

The presence of comprehensive studies in the field of emergency nursing care during chemical incidents is essential for an appropriate response to evolving needs. The objective of the present study is to identify the scope of studies conducted regarding emergency nursing care in chemical incidents.

In March 2023, databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Persian-language databases Magiran and Scientific Information Database (SID) were systematically searched without any time limitations. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart, two researchers independently reviewed articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on titles and abstracts. Subsequently, the researchers examined the full text of selected studies, identifying relevant articles. The data were then synthesized descriptively and presented in a summary table.

A total of 33 reviewed articles published between 1979 and 2021 were identified. The main domains included decontamination (seven articles), structural preparedness (11 articles), pre-hospital interventions (two articles), triage (two articles), respiratory care (one article), vision care (five articles), and skin and burn care (three articles), as classified.

The results of the investigations indicated that emergency nursing care in chemical incidents possesses multiple dimensions, requiring a logical approach where care considerations involve strict adherence to a chronological sequence and precise attention to each dimension. A holistic and comprehensive perspective towards these cases can serve as a guiding path in response to the needs of the casualties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.41
2025-10-13
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2025/3/jemtac.2025.41.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.41&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Torani S, Majd PM, Maroufi SS, Dowlati M, Sheikhi RA. The importance of education on disasters and emergencies: a review article. J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jan 1; 8:(1):85. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_262_18
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Yarmohammadian MH, Nasr-Isfahani M, Anbari E. Assessment of preparedness and response of teaching hospitals of Isfahan, Iran, to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear incidents. Health Inf Manag. 2016 Feb 20; 12:(6):777–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Prockop LD. Weapons of mass destruction: overview of the CBRNEs (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives). J Neurolog Sci. 2006 Nov 1; 249:(1):50–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2006.06.017
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ebadi M, Sharififar ST, Zareiyan A. Comparison of the effects of conventional and simulation teaching methods on nursing students’ knowledge in personal protection in chemical attacks. EBNESINA. 2013 Dec 10; 15:(4):17–23. http://ebnesina.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-215-en.html
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Paleari S. Natural disasters in Italy: do we invest enough in risk prevention and mitigation? Int J Environ Stud. 2018 Jul 4; 75:(4):673–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1418995
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Roy T. Natural Disasters and Indian History: Oxford India Short Introductions. Oxford: OUP Catalogue; 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Degg M. Natural disasters: recent trends and future prospects. Geography. 1992 Jul 1; 77:(3):198–209. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40572191
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Karbownik K, Wray A. Long-run consequences of exposure to natural disasters. J Labor Econ. 2019 Jul 1; 37:(3):949–1007.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Estrada MA, Ndoma A. The uses of unmanned aerial vehicles–UAV’s-(or drones) in social logistic: natural disasters response and humanitarian relief aid. Procedia Comput Sci. 2019 Jan 1; 149:: 375–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.151
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tokuda Y, Kikuchi M, Takahashi O, Stein GH. Prehospital management of sarin nerve gas terrorism in urban settings: 10 years of progress after the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Resuscitation. 2006 Feb 1; 68:(2):193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.05.023
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nawfal Dagher T, Al-Bayssari C, Diene SM, Azar E, Rolain JM. Bacterial infection during wars, conflicts and post-natural disasters in Asia and the Middle East: a narrative review. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 Jun 2; 18:(6):511–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1750952
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Seyedin H, Moradimajd P, Bagheri H, Dolatabadi ZA, Nasiri A. Providing a chemical events and threat’s preparedness model for hospitals in the country: a qualitative study. J Mil Med. 2021 May-Jun; 23:(3):220–7. https://doi.org/10.30491/JMM.23.3.220
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Masoumi G, Maniey M, Aghababaeian H, Ostadtaghizadeh A, Ahvazi LA. Lessons learned from a chlorine gas leakage in Dezful City, Iran. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Apr; 16:(2):818–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.284
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ma H, Chihava TN, Fu J, Zhang S, Lei L, Tan J, et al. Competencies of military nurse managers: a scoping review and unifying framework. J Nurs Manag. 2020 Sep; 28:(6):1166–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13068
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dehaghi MG, Mahmoudi H. Clarifying the concept of the readiness of the military nurse at the war: analyzing the concept with the Rogers Approach. J Mil Med. 2021 Jul-Aug; 23:(4):320–8. https://doi.org/10.30491/JMM.23.4.320
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamzepour S. Surveying knowledge and performance of basij medical community members of west azerbaijan in response to the biological events in 2016-2017: a short report. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2019; 17:(10):975–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Irannejad B, Safarabadi M, Jadidi A. Survey of biological incidents preparedness of hospitals in Markazi Province in 2016. J Mil Med. 2017 Jan 1; 19:(2):169–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ebadi M, Sharififar ST, Baniyaghoobi F, Pishgoie A. Comparison of nursing students’ Satisfaction about two methods of demonstration and simulation for training of mask making against chemical attacks. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2016 Apr 10; 9:(1):63–70. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-944-en.html
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Khoshsima S, Salari MM, Tadrisi SD, Daneshmandi M, Mahdizade S. Comparison of nurses learning level by multimedia and web-based methods in teaching nursing care of chemical accidents. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2013 Oct 10; 6:(3):129–34. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-394-en.html
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthcare. 2015 Sep 1; 13:(3):132–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Koenig KL, Boatright CJ, Hancock JA, Denny FJ, Teeter DS, Kahn CA, et al. Health care facility-based decontamination of victims exposed to chemical, biological, and radiological materials. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan 1; 26:(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.07.004
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Leary AD, Schwartz MD, Kirk MA, Ignacio JS, Wencil EB, Cibulsky SM. Evidence-based patient decontamination: An integral component of mass exposure chemical incident planning and response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014 Jun; 8:(3):260–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2014.41
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Monteith RG, Pearce LD. Self-care decontamination within a chemical exposure mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Dis Med. 2015 Jun; 30:(3):288–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X15004677
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Collins S, James T, Carter H, Symons C, Southworth F, Foxall K, et al. Mass casualty decontamination for chemical incidents: research outcomes and future priorities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 17; 18:(6):3079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063079
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Braue Jr EH, Smith KH, Doxzon BF, Lumpkin HL, Clarkson ED. Efficacy studies of reactive skin decontamination lotion, M291 skin decontamination kit, 0.5% bleach, 1% soapy water, and skin exposure reduction paste against chemical warfare agents, part 1: guinea pigs challenged with VX. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011 Mar 1; 30:(1):15–28. https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2010.515280
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cancio LC. Chemical casualty decontamination by medical platoons in the 82d Airborne Division. Mil Med. 1993 Jan 1; 158:(1):1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. George G, Ramsay K, Rochester M, Seah R, Spencer H, Vijayasankar D, et al. Facilities for chemical decontamination in accident and emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J. 2002 Sep 1; 19:(5):453–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.19.5.453
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Malmén Y, Joki H, Jensen JS. A novel tool for risk assessment related to chemical attacks. Risk Anal. 2014 Jun 4; 9:: 121. https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK140111
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitchell CJ, Kernohan WG, Higginson R. Are emergency care nurses prepared for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or explosive incidents? Int Emerg Nurs. 2012 Jul 1; 20:(3):151–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2011.10.001
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tan GA, Fitzgerald MC. Chemical–biological–radiological (CBR) response: a template for hospital emergency departments. Med J Aust. 2002 Aug; 177:(4):196–9. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04732.x
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Totenhofer RI, Kierce M. It’s a disaster: emergency departments’ preparation for a chemical incident or disaster. Accid Emerg Nurs. 1999 Jul 1; 7:(3):141–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-2302(99)80073-3
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Razak S, Hignett S, Barnes J. Emergency department response to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive events: a systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Oct; 33:(5):543–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X18000900
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Burgess JL, Blackmon GM, Brodkin CA, Robertson WO. Hospital preparedness for hazardous materials incidents and treatment of contaminated patients. West J Med. 1997 Dec; 167:(6):387–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Davidson RK, Magalini S, Brattekås K, Bertrand C, Brancaleoni R, Rafalowski C, et al. Preparedness for chemical crisis situations: experiences from European medical response exercises. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019; 23:(3):1239–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Al-Damouk M, Bleetman A. Impact of the Department of Health initiative to equip and train acute trusts to manage chemically contaminated casualties. Emerg Med J. 2005 May 1; 22:(5):347–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2004.018580
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Jacobs-Wingo JL, Schlegelmilch J, Berliner M, Airall-Simon G, Lang W. Emergency preparedness training for hospital nursing staff, New York City, 2012–2016. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Jan; 51:(1):81–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12425
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Chan JT, Yeung RS, Tang SY. Hospital preparedness for chemical and biological incidents in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2002 Dec; 8:(6):440–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Okumura T, Ninomiya N, Ohta M. The chemical disaster response system in Japan. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003 Sep; 18:(3):189–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00001047
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kenar L, Karayilanoglu T. Prehospital management and medical intervention after a chemical attack. Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan 1; 21:(1):84–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2003.005488
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Anan H, Otomo Y, Homma M, Oshiro K, Kondo H, Shimamura F, et al. Proposal for reforming prehospital response to chemical terrorism disasters in Japan: going back to the basics of saving the lives of the injured by securing the safety of the rescue team. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Feb; 35:(1):88–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X19005119
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Okumura T, Kondo H, Nagayama H, Makino T, Yoshioka T, Yamamoto Y. Simple triage and rapid decontamination of mass casualties with colored clothes pegs (STARDOM-CCP) system against chemical releases. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 Jun; 22:(3):233–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00004738
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Baker MS. Creating order from chaos: part I: triage, initial care, and tactical considerations in mass casualty and disaster response. Mil Med. 2007 Mar 1; 172:(3):232–6. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed.172.3.232
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Baker DJ. Management of respiratory failure in toxic disasters. Resuscitation. 1999 Oct 1; 42:(2):125–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00098-2
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Khodabukus R, Tallouzi M. Chemical eye injuries 1: presentation, clinical features, treatment and prognosis. Nurs Times. 2009 Jun 1; 105:(22):28–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Khodabukus R, Tallouzi M. Chemical eye injuries 2: management and nursing care to promote visual rehabilitation. Nurs Times. 2009 Jun 1; 105:(23):28–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Records RE, Courtiss EH. Primary care of ocular emergencies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980 Feb 1; 65:(2):248. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198002000-00043
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Pfister RR. Chemical injuries of the eye. Ophthalmology. 1983 Oct 1; 90:(10):1246–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Korkmaz I, Palamar M, Egrilmez S, Yagci A, Selver OB. Ten years of pediatric ocular chemical burn experience in a tertiary eye care center in Turkey. Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Apr 1; 48:(4):175–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000858
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Fitzpatrick KT, Moylan JA. Emergency care of chemical burns. Postgrad Med. 1985 Oct 1; 78:(5):189–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1985.11699164
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Georgieva S, Ivanovski K, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Mijoska A, et al. Hydrofluoric acid: burns and systemic toxicity, protective measures, immediate and hospital medical treatment. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 11; 6:(11):2257–69. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.429
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Cancio LC, Sheridan RL, Dent R, Hjalmarson SG, Gardner E, Matherly AF, et al. Guidelines for burn care under austere conditions: special etiologies: blast, radiation, and chemical injuries. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan 1; 38:(1):e482–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000367
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.41
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2025.41
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): chemical incidentsemergencyNursing and scoping review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error