1887
Volume 2026, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Skin closure techniques in inguinal hernia surgery significantly influence postoperative outcomes, including pain, healing, scar formation, and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive as an alternative to conventional sutures for skin closure in inguinal hernia surgeries.

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center from November 2023 to October 2025. Seventy patients aged 18–60 years undergoing inguinal hernia repair were randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1 (sutures) and Group 2 (tissue adhesive). Exclusion criteria included recurrent or strangulated hernia, allergies to cyanoacrylate/formaldehyde, and immunocompromised states. Outcomes assessed included pain (VAS), wound healing (Hollander score), scar quality (Vancouver Scar Scale and Visual Analogue Scar Scale), complications, and satisfaction scores.

Group 2 showed significantly lower pain scores at early postoperative intervals ( < 0.05), shorter wound closure time (8.8 ± 1.4 min vs. 11.7 ± 2.6 min; = 0.000), and reduced hospital stay (1.9 ± 0.8 days vs. 3.5 ± 1.6 days; = 0.000). No infections were reported in either group. Chronic pain at 30 days was less frequent in Group 2 ( = 0.046). Wound healing and scar scores favored Group 2 on days 7 and 30 ( < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher in Group 2 across all follow-up visits, while surgeons preferred sutures ( < 0.05).

-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive offers superior early postoperative outcomes and higher patient satisfaction compared to sutures, although surgeons reported greater satisfaction with traditional methods. Tissue adhesive is a viable alternative for skin closure in inguinal hernia surgeries.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2026.12
2026-03-17
2026-03-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qmj/2026/1/qmj.2026.12.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2026.12&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abebe MS, Tareke AA, Alem A, Debebe W, Beyene A. Worldwide magnitude of inguinal hernia: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. SAGE Open Med. 2022 Nov 22; 10:: 20503121221139150. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121221139150. [PubMed].
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lomanto D, Cheah WK, Faylona JM, Huang CS, Lohsiriwat D, Maleachi A, et al. Inguinal hernia repair: Toward Asian guidelines. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 Feb; 8:(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12141. [PubMed].
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Van Hee R. History of inguinal hernia repair. Jurnalul de chirurgie. 2011 Jul 1; 7:(3):301–19. Available from: http://www.jurnaluldechirurgie.ro/jurnal/docs/jurnal311/art%2001_vol%207_2011_nr%203.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Singh JP, Kumar V, Upadhayaya S, Chaudhry NK. Comparison of wound closure using pctylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus subcuticular suture in inguinal hernia surgery. Int J Sci Stud. 2019 Jun; 7:(3):45–53. Available from: http://www.ijss-sn.com/uploads/2/0/1/5/20153321/10_ijss_june_oa_10_-_2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dua A, Nawaz SA, Prasad KK. Comparison of tissue adhesive (N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) versus conventional suturing in umbilical hernia surgeries. Int Surg J. 2021; 8:1165–7. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20211291
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Haribabu A, Ramanaiah NA, Vamsi MS. A comparitive study of two skin closure techniques subcuticular monocryl and vertical mattress suture in cases posted for inguinoscrotal surgeries. Int Wound J. 2019; 18:(6):43–52. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1806064352
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Thompson CM, Sood RF, Honari S, Carrougher GJ, Gibran NS. What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers. Burns. 2015 Nov 1; 41:(7):1442–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.04.018
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sahu S, Mishra S, Lenka S, Banerjee R, Pachisia S, Ghosh S. Comparison between N-butyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and Ethilon nylon sutures in extraoral maxillofacial incisions: A randomized prospective study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Jul-Sep; 9:(3):173–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.002
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Toriumi DM, O’Grady K, Desai D, Bagal A. Use of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate for skin closure in facial plastic surgery. Plas Reconstr Surg. 1998 Nov 1; 102:(6):2209–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199811000-00062
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Huguenin-Dezot M, Peisl S, Georgiou E, Candinas D, Beldi G, Helbling C, et al. Glued suture-less peritoneum closure in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair reduces acute postoperative pain. Sci Rep. 2024 May 23; 14:(1):11786. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62364-w
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Testini M, Lissidini G, Poli E, Gurrado A, Lardo D, Piccinni G. A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing sutures, N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and human fibrin glue for mesh fixation during primary inguinal hernia repair. Can J Surg. 2010 Jun; 53:(3): 155–60. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20507786/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jani K. Randomised controlled trial of n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue fixation versus suture fixation of mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun; 12:(2): 118–23. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.169954
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chibbaro S, Tacconi L. Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr 1; 16:(4):535–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.08.004
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ong CC, Jacobsen AS, Joseph VT. Comparing wound closure using tissue glue versus subcuticular suture for pediatric surgical incisions: A prospective, randomised trial. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002 Sep; 18:(5–6):553–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0728-0. Epub 2002 Jun 14. [PubMed].
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bernard L, Doyle J, Friedlander SF, Eichenfield LF, Gibbs NF, Cunningham BB. A prospective comparison of octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (dermabond) and suture for the closure of excisional wounds in children and adolescents. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Sep 1; 137:(9):1177–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.137.9.1177
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Daykan Y, Sharon-Weiner M, Pasternak Y, Tzadikevitch-Geffen K, Markovitch O, Sukenik-Halevy R, et al. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr 1; 216:(4):406-e1–406.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.009
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Clark RE, Hollander JE, Group TS. Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2002 Mar 1; 131:(3):270–6. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2002.121377
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shivamurthy DM, Singh S, Reddy S. Comparison of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate and conventional sutures in facial skin closure. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan-Jun; 1:(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.69151
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2026.12
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2026.12
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): inguinal herniaN-butylcyanoacrylatepatient satisfactionseromasurgeon satisfaction and Suture
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error