1887
Volume 2010, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • E-ISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Proper post-extubation pain control in traumatic blunt chest injury represents a challenge to provide adequate analgesia for proper lung inflation and to prevent re-intubation. In this case, the average opioid (Remifentanil) infusion drip in a traumatic blunt chest injury patient in the 48 hours prior to extubation was calculated and converted to the equivalent analgesic one of the Fentanyl Transdermal Therapeutic System (Fentanyl TTS Patch). The analgesic gap before the onset of action for the applied fentanyl patch was covered by frequent injections of tramadol. Evaluation of the Fentanyl TTS effect through the post-extubation period was carried out by measuring the analgesic effect on a visual analogue scale, the alertness status by simple sedation score, while the respiratory performance was followed by the negative inspiratory force. The outcome in this case showed that Fentanyl Patch is a reliable, favorable, safe and non-invasive method that produces a good analgesic effect and positive impaction on the post-extubation course of respiratory performance with a satisfactory outcome and no side effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2010.2.18
2010-12-01
2019-11-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Joshi PJ, Warner DS, Fleisher LA. A comparison of the remifentanil and Fentanyl Adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2002; 14::494499.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Twersky R5, Jamerson B, Warner DS, Fleisher LA, Hogue S. Hemodynamic and emergence profile of remifentanil versus fentanyl prospectively compared in a large population of surgical patients. J Clin Anesth. 2001; 13::407416.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fleisher LA, Hogue S, Colopy M. Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia? J Clin Anesth. 2001; 13::401406.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Duthie DJR. Remifentanil and tramadol. British Journal of Anesthesia. 1998; 81::5157.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson TP. Pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety of analgesia with a focus on Tramadol HCI. An J Med. 1996 Jul 31; 101:1A:47s53s.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dayer P, Collart L, Desmeules J. The pharmacology of tramadol. Drugs. 1994; 47:Suppl:37.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Muijsers RB, Wagstaff AJ. Transdermal fentanyl: An update review of its pharmacological proporties and therapeutic efficacy in chronic cancer pain control. Drugs. 2001; 61:15:2289:307.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jeal W, Benfield P. Transdermal fentanyl: A review of its pharmacological proporties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control. Drugs. 1997; Jan; 53:1:109:38.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kornick CA, Santiago-Palma J. Benefit-risk assessment of transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic pain. Drug Saf. 2003; 26:13:951:73.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Egan TD, Lemmens JH, Fiset P, et al., The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993; 79::881892.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kapila A, Glass PS, Jabobs JR. Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil. Anesthesiology. 1995; 83::968975.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson JP, Rowbotham DJ. Remifentanil: An opioid for the 21st century. BrJAnaesth. 1996; 76::341343.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale Pain. 1983 May; 16:1:87101.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975 Dec; 1:4:379384.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H. Validity and readability of the observer's assessment alertness/sedation scale: Study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990; 10::244251.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jean-Francois P, Chanques G. Current practice in sedation and analgesia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106::678695.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fiastro JF, Habib MP, Shon BY, Campbell S. Comparison of standard weaning parameters and the mechanical work of breathing in mechanically ventilated patients. Chest. August 1988; 94:2:232238.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoo S, Park L. Variations in the Measurement of Weaning Parameters: A Survey of Respiratory Therapists. Chest. June 1,2002; 121::19471955.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, Hoppenbrouwers M, Richarz U, Bonnet F. lontophoretic Transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient- controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2007; 98:6:806815.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Chung F, Atkinson LES. Patient-Controlled Transdermal Fentanyl Hydrochloride vs Intravenous Morphine Pump for Postoperative Pain. JAMA. 2004; 291::13331341.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2010.2.18
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error