1887
Volume 2004, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed the results of263 consecutive Methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) done in our laboratory between July 2000 and June 2003, in symptomatic adult patients with no history of bronchial asthma or chronic lung disease, who presented with chronic nonproductive cough, shortness of breath (subjective dyspnea), or both. All of these patients had normal results of chest physical examination, chest radiographs and screening spirometry measurements (FEVl >80% of predicted). We considered a 20% fall in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEVJ as the primary outcome measure (MCT PC 20-FEV1X and a 35% fall in the specific conductance (sGaw) as the primary outcome in patients who cannot perform acceptable spirometry. Out of263 patients, 79 patients (30%) were positive for bronchial hyper-responsivenes (BHR), 20 patients (25.3%) of the positive patients had sever BHR, 18 patients (22.8%) had moderate BHR, and 41 patients (51.9%) had mild BHR.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2004.1.11
2004-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Rubinfeld AR, Pain MCF. Perception of asthma. Lancet. 1976;:1882.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Irwin RS, Curley FJ, French CL. Chronic cough: The spectrum and frequency of causes, key components of the diagnostic evaluation and outcome of specific therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990; 141::640.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Laprise C, Laviolette M, Boutet M, Boulet LP. Asymptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness: relationships with airway inflammation and remodeling. Eur Respir J. 1999; 14::63.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee P, Abisheganaden J, Chee CB, Wang YT. A new asthma severity index: a predictor of near-fatal asthma. Eur Respir J. 2001; 18::272.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, et al., Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161::309329.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Charles Lacy RPH, Pharm D. Methacholine: Drug Information Handbook, 1978.
  7. Sterk PJ, Fabbri LM, Quanjer PH, et al., Airway responsiveness. Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993; 16::53.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hargreave FE, Ryan G, Thomson NC. Bronchial responsiveness to histamine or methacholine in asthma: Measurement and clinical significance. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981; 68::347.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstein MF, Pacana BA, Dvorin DJ, et al., Retrospective analyses of methacholine inhalation challenges. Chest. 1994; 105::1081.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldstein MF, Veza BA, Dunsky EH, et al., Comparisons of peak diurnal expiratory flow variation, postbronchodilator FEVj responses, and methacholine inhalation challenges in the evaluation of suspected asthma. Chest. 2001; 119::1001.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Perpina M, Pellicer C, de Diego A, Compte L, Macian V. Diagnostic value of the bronchial provocation test with Methacholine in asthma: Bayesian analysis approach. Chest. 1993; 104::149154.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2004.1.11
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and Methacholine challenge test
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error