1887
Volume 2003, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • E-ISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

FNA has emerged as a powerful and accurate diagnostic tool for breast carcinomas. In the experienced hands false positive and false negative diagnosis have been reduced to a minimum. It has also been recognized that besides diagnosis, several other important clinical prognostic information can be obtained from FNA material. These include estrogen and progesterone recep-tor assay, proliferative fraction and oncogene products. These are achieved by subjecting the FNA material to immunoperoxidase methods, ploidy analysis an'd S phase frac-tion on flow cytometry. Lately cytological grading of breast cancer has been added to these investigations 1.2.3.4.5 Since histology is the gold standard in the diagnosis of breast cancer, and since the FNA obviously may not sample enough breast volume, the question is why bother with cytological grading of breast cancer? Why don't we wait and do the grading on histol-ogy where several sections would be examined and thereby cover any kind of variations in the tumor? On the other hand histo-logical grading of breast carcinoma assesses mainly nuclei mor-phology and architectural configurations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2003.2.15
2003-12-01
2019-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Robinson IA, McKee G, Nicholson A, D'Arch J, Jackson PA, Cook MG, Kissin MW. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas. Lancet. 1995; 343::947949.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Robinson IA, McKee G, Kissin MW. Typing and grading breast carcinoma on fine- needle aspiration: Is this clinically useful information? Diagn Cytopathol. 1995; 13::260265.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Taniguchi E, Yang O, Nakamura Y, Shan L, Nakamura M, Sato M, Mori I, Sakurai T, Kakudo K. Cytologic grading of invasive breast carcinoma: correlation with clinico-pathologic variables and predictive value of nodal metastasis. Acta Cytol. 2000; 44::587591.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunt CM, Ellis IO, Elstrom CW, Locker A, Pearson O, Blarney RW. Cytological grading system of breast carcinoma: A feasible proposition? Cytopathology. 1990; 1::287295.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Moroz K, Lipscomb J, Vial U Jr, Dhurandhar N. Cytologic nuclear grade of malignant breast aspirates as a predictor of histologic grade. Light microscopy and image analysis characteristics. Acta Cytol. 1997; 41::11071111.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kalogeraki A, Tamiolakis O, Kozoni V, Tzardi M, Panayiotides J, Melissas J, Zoras O, Tsiftsis O, Delides GS. Nuclear grading in invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer Detect Prevo. 2000; 24::224227.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Herd-Smith A, Carriaggi P, Confortini M, Bulgaresi P. Prognostic value of breast cancer cytologic grading: A retrospective study of 213 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 1993; 9::160163.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloom H, Richardson W. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1957; 11::359377.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cajulis SR, Hessel RG, Hidvegi OF, Yu GH. Cytological grading of fine- needle aspirates of breast carcinoma by private practice pathologists. Acta Cytol. 1997; 41::313320.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomas J, Mallon E, George W. Semi quantitative analysis of fine needle aspirates from benign and malignant breast lesions. J Clin. Pathol. 1989; 42::2834.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pandit M, Parekh HJ. Cytological Grading of Breast Carcinoma; Comparison of four grading systems. J. Cytol. 2000; 17::3944.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2003.2.15
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error