1887
Volume 2002, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  •  E-ISSN:  Will be obtained soon 2227-0426

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the pattern of both types of pri-mary glaucoma in Qatari adult patients and to outline the main problem related to its management.

Material and Methods: A random sample of Qatari patients with primary glaucoma either open angle or angle closure glaucoma in whom the diagnosis was made after the age of 30 years was studied over the last 2 years (1997-1998) by standard questionnaire as regards their personal and medical profile, and assessed ophthalmologically both subjectively and objectively.

Results: 195 patients were studied, of whom 29.7% had angle closure glaucoma. Early presentation was clearly shown in both type of glaucoma. Legal blindness was present in significant proportion of patients.

Comment: Glaucoma in Qatari patients presents at an early age, with substantial loss of visual function at presentation. Poor compliance is an obstacle for manage-ment in both types of glaucomas. The need for an educa-tional campaign and a program for early detection is highly advised.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2002.1.15
2002-06-01
2020-04-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Shaffer RN. Ill Symposium: Office management of the primary glaucomas. Gonioscopy, ophthalmoscopy and perimetry. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1960; 64::112127.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Stewart Wc, Chorak RP, Hunt HH, Sethuraman G. Factors assiciated with visual loss in patients with advanced Glaucomatous changes in the optic nerve head. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1993; 116::176181.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Leske MC. The epidemiology of open angle glaucoma: A review. Am J Epidemiol. 1983; 118::166191.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80::389393.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hiller R, Kahn HA. Blindness from glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975; 80::6269.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Leibowitz Hm, Krneger DG, Munder LR, et al., The framingham eye study. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980; 24::335610.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghafour IM, Allan D, Foulds W. Common Causes of blindness and visual handicap in the west of Scotland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983; 67::209213.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Witt K, Katz J, Roy all RM. Blindness and visual impairment in American Urban population. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108::286290.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Wu XX, Wright L, Courtney P. Prevalence of Glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77::1721.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shin DH, Beck B, Kolker AE. Family history in primary open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977; 95::598.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kass MA, Palmberg P, Becker , et al., Histocompatibility antigens and Primary Open Glaucoma: A reassessment Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96::2207.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, Quigly H, et al., Family history and risk of Primary Open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112::6973.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Booth A, Churchill A, Anwar R, Menage M, Markham A:. The genetics of Primary open angle glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997; 81::409414.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kass M. A: Compliance and prognosis in glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1985; 103::504.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Granstrom PA. Progression of visual field defects in glaucoma. Relation to compliance with pilocarpine therapy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1985; 103::529.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kurland LT, Tauf RC. The frequency of glaucoma in a small Urban Community. AMJ Ophthalmol. 1957; 43::539.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, Bernardi P, Defranco I, Perfetti S, Varotto A, Tenna V. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Enga-Newmarkt study. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105::209.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bengtsson B. The prevalence of Glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981; 65::4649.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2002.1.15
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error