1887
Volume 2020 Number 3
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Triage of victims in mass casualty incidents (MCI) is crucial in prioritizing care and allocating resources1. Triage skills are important to be evaluated for training and better preparedness. Using clinical vignettes is a well-known approach to evaluate clinicians’ knowledge and decision-making2. This study aims to evaluate preparedness of emergency residents and fellows to triage victims of MCI. Emergency Medicine (EM) residents and fellows at Hamad General Hospital, Emergency Department (HGH-ED) were invited to the study. Each participant filled a questionnaire followed by triaging of 15 vignette-based victims of MCI. Descriptive statistics elaborated on participants’ training and relevant exposures (Table 1). It also showed the degree of agreement in their triage results and rates of under-triage and over-triage. Cohen's kappa coefficient showed inter-rater agreement and internal consistency in triage results. Participants included 63 emergency trainees, 27 residents, and 36 fellows. Only 28.3% (n = 17) of them participated in an MCI drill over the past two years. 51.7% (n = 31) attended training on triage in MCI. 73.3% (n = 44) indicated that they have rarely or never triaged victims in a real MCI or a drill. Only 3.3% (n = 2) perceived themselves as highly confident in triaging victims of MCI. A total of 904 triage outcomes resulted from this exercise (Table 2). The overall rate of agreement among the triage outcomes is 73% (660 times in 904 triage outcomes). The rate of over-triage was 36.8% and 23% under-triage. Better triage results was associated with previous triage training. The rate of over-triage was as the literature recommends. However, the rate of under triage was alarmingly higher than the literature recommendation as < 5%3. The higher rate of under-triage imposes a risk of missing seriously injured victims, which may lead to higher mortality or poor patients’ outcomes. Further training and exercises may be the key to saving more lives and resources.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2020.qhc.3
2021-01-20
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2020/3/jemtac.2020.qhc.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2020.qhc.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hick JL, Hanfling D, Cantrill SV. Allocating scarce resources in disasters: emergency department principles. Ann Emerg Medicine. 2012;59:177–87 .
  2. Mohan D, Fischhoff B, Farris C, Switzer GE, Rosengart MR, Yealy DM, et al. Validating a vignette-based instrument to study physician decision making in trauma triage. Med Decis Making. 2014;34:242–52 .
  3. Peng J, Xiang H. Trauma undertriage and overtriage rates: are we using the wrong formulas?. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(11):2191–2192. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.061 .
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2020.qhc.3
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2020.qhc.3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Conference Abstract
Keyword(s): assessmentemergency medicine traineesmass casualty and triage
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error