Volume 2022, Issue 1
  • EISSN: 2220-2749


Informed consent is an ethical and legal requirement in modern medicine. A valid consent implies that the patient can decide on treatment after receiving adequate information from his doctor. In case of incapacity and specific conditions, doctors can administer treatments without patient consent. Nonetheless, some cases are borderline, such as the patient presented in this paper who had a mild intellectual impairment and refused to undergo urgent intervention for aortic dissection. In this case, psychiatrists and cardiologists collaborated to check whether the patient could consent and decided to respect his choice. He was not operated, and the local ethical committee agreed with this decision. In Tunisia and developing countries, the paternalistic approach is still prevalent in the doctor-patient relationship. This paper highlights that ethical considerations should be universal and applied to all patients in all cultures and discusses ethical and legal aspects.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. von Tigerstrom B. Informed Consent for Treatment: A Review of the Legal Requirements. J SOGC [Internet]. 2001 Oct; 23:(10):951–6. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0849583116308631
    [Google Scholar]
  2. del Carmen MG, Joffe S. Informed consent for medical treatment and research: a review. Oncologist. 2005 Sep; 10:(8):636-41. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.10-8-636.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ryynänen OP, Myllykangas M, Kinnunen J, Takala J. Attitudes to health care prioritisation methods and criteria among nurses, doctors,politicians and the general public. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Dec; 49:(11):1529-39. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00222-1. PMID: 10515634.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pollard BJ. Autonomy and paternalism in medicine. Med J Aust. 1993 Dec 6-20; 159:(11-12):797-802. doiL: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb141355.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ravinetto R, Buvé A, Halidou T, Lutumba P, Talisuna A, et al. Double ethical review of North-South collaborative clinical research: hidden paternalism or real partnership? Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Apr; 16:(4):527-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02732.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Falkum E, Førde R. Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jan; 52:(2):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00224-0.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Quante M. Medical Paternalism. In: Philosophy and Medicine [Internet].2017. p. 203–32. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-56869-0_8
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Winninger D, Pineau L. Incapacity and autonomy: striking a balance. Health Law Can. 1995; 15:(3):59-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Arscott K, Dagnan D, Kroese BS. Assessing the ability of people with a learning disability to give informed consent to treatment. Psychol Med. 1999 Nov; 29:(6):1367-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799008715.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Müller, A., & Schaber, P. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351028264
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Grubb A. UNITED KINGDOM. Med Law Rev. 1994 Mar; 2:(1):92–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/2.1.92
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kooli C. COVID-19: Public health issues and ethical dilemmas. Ethics Med Public Health. 2021 Jun;17:100635. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100635.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Case Report
Keyword(s): aortic dissectionautonomycapacityconsent and ethics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error