1887
Volume 2016, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2225-9228
  • EISSN:

Abstract

A historically marginalized and overlooked segment of the general population worldwide, persons with disabilities have long struggled with discrimination, inequality and even maltreatment. They have often been treated as societal outcasts and their disabilities treated as medical conditions that need to be “fixed” in order for the individual to join the rest of society. Throughout the last three decades, this approach has been steadily changing towards an inclusive model whereas persons with disabilities are recognized as a protected group of citizens who are due the same complete human rights as the general population. This change has become particularly evident with the United Nation's approval of the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2006. However, the strides made by the approval of the CRPD are merely philosophical unless the rights recognized by the Convention can be defended by a court of law. This is where the importance of the ratification of the CRPD by member and observer states comes into focus. By ratifying the treaty in 2008, Qatar committed itself to a number of social and legal obligations. However, implementation of the CRPD in Qatar is dependent on a number of factors including political willingness, the abilities of the CRPD's United Nations Follow-Up Committee, and the capacity to raise awareness among the public in Qatar. This paper looks into the traditional approaches taken towards persons with disabilities, the impact of the CRPD and the challenges faced by Qatar as it looks to implement the CRPD.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jlghp.2016.2
2016-08-27
2020-09-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jlghp/2016/1/jlghp.2016.2.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jlghp.2016.2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Peces-Barba G, Dykinson SL. Historia de los derechos fundamentales. Siglo XX. Madrid: Dykinson 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ansuátegui Roig FJ. Ciudadanía y fronteras de los derechos. Papeles - El tiempo de los derechos. 2014; 24:, ISSN: 1989–8797.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Peces-Barba G. Curso de derechos fundamentales. Madrid: BOE–Universidad Carlos III 2015;:154.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barranco MC. Diversidad de situaciones y universalidad de los derechos. Madrid: Dykinson 2011;:22.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Palacios A. El modelo social de discapacidad. Madrid: Colección CERMI 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cabra MA, Bariffi F, Palacios A. Derechos humanos de las personas con discapacidad: la Convención Internacional de las Naciones Unidas. Madrid: Ramón Areces 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bariffi F. El regimen jurídico internacional de los derechos humanos de las personas con discapacidad. Madrid: Cinca 2014;:130. Available at http://www.cermi.es/es-ES/ColeccionesCermi/ConvencionONU/Lists/Coleccion/Attachments/12/coleccion%20ONU%20no11_ONU.pdf. Last accessed September 7, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Quinn GDegener T, eds. Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability. Geneva: Office of the United Nations Commission for Human Rights, United Nations 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lawson A. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: New era or false dawn? Syracuse J Int Law Commerce. 2007; 34::583.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mégret F. The disabilities convention: Human rights of persons with disabilities or disability rights? Hu Rights Q. 2008; 30::494516.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Oliver M. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 1996;:31.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Oliver M, Barnes C, Mercer G. Disability. Cambridge: Polity Press 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Stein MA. Disability human rights. Calif Law Rev. 2007; 95:1:75121.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cuenca Gómez P. Los derechos fundamentals de las personas con discapacidad. Un análisis a la luz de la Convención de la ONU. Madrid: Cuadernos de la Cátedra Democracia y Derechos Humanos, Universidad de Alcalá-Defensor del Pueblo 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Morris J. Pride against Prejudice. A Personal Politics of Disability. London: Women's Press Ltd 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanh H. The political implications of disability definitions and data. Disabil Policy Stud. 1993; 4:2:4152.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hughes B. Disability and the body. In: Barnes CBarton LOliver M, eds. Disability Studies Today. Oxford: Polity Press 2002;:5876.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Romañach J, Palacios A. El modelo de la diversidad. Madrid: Diversitas–AIES 2006;:28.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. De Asís R. Derechos humanos y discapacidad. Algunas reflexiones derivadas del análisis de la discapacidad desde la teoría de los derechos. In: Campoy Cervera IPalacios A, eds. Igualdad, no discriminación y discapacidad. Una visión integradora de las realidades española y argentina. Madrid: Dykinson 2007. 1750.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cuenca Gómez P. Disability and human rights: a theoretical analysis. Age Hum Rights J. 2015; 4::3459.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. De Asís R. Sobre discapacidad y derechos. Madrid: Dykinson 2013;:70.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. De Asís R. Las situaciones de dependencia desde un enfoque de derechos humanos. In: Ramiro MACuenca P, eds. Los derechos humanos. La utopía de los excluidos. Madrid: Dykinson 2010;:163180.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cuenca P. Estudios sobre los derechos de las personas sordas. Madrid: Dykinson 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Palacios A, Bariffi F. La discapacidad como una cuestión de derechos humanos. Una aproximación a la Convención Internacional sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Madrid: Cinca, Colección Telefónica Accessible 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mackay D. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Syracuse J Int Law Commerce. 2007; 34::323331.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Barranco MC. Human rights and vulnerability. The examples of sexism and ageism. Age Hum Rights J. 2015; 5::2949.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/jlghp.2016.2
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Disabilities , human rights , non-discrimination , Qatar and United Nations
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error