1887
Volume 2014, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2305-7823
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The use of radiation in medicine is now pervasive and routine. From their crude beginnings 100 years ago, diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine and radiation therapy have all evolved into advanced techniques, and are regarded as essential tools across all branches and specialties of medicine.

The inherent properties of ionizing radiation provide many benefits, but can also cause potential harm. Its use within medical practice thus involves an informed judgment regarding the risk/benefit ratio. This judgment requires not only medical knowledge, but also an understanding of radiation itself.

This work provides a global perspective on radiation risks, exposure and mitigation strategies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/gcsp.2014.57
2015-02-01
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gcsp/2014/4/gcsp.2014.57.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/gcsp.2014.57&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Reed AB. The history of radiation use in medicine. J Vasc. Surg. 2011 Jan; 53:1 Suppl:3S5S.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodman PC. The new light: Discovery and introduction of the X-Ray. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1995; 165::10411045.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Glasser O. Roentgen and the discovery of the Roentgen rays. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1995; 165::10331040.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dutreix J. From X-rays to radioactivity and radiation. The discovery and works of Henri Becquerel (1851–1908). Bull Acad Natl Med. 1996 Jan; 180:1:109118.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Diamantis A, Magiorkinis E, Papadimitriou A, Androutsos G. The contribution of Maria Sklodowska Curie and Pierre Curie to nuclear and Medical Physics. A hundred and ten years after the discovery of radium. Hell J Nucl Med. 2008 Jan; 11:1:3338.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Timins JK. Communication of benefits and risks of medical radiation: A historical perspective. Health Phys. 2011 Nov; 101:5:562565.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Christensen DM, Iddins CJ, Sugarman SL. Ionizing radiation injuries and illnesses. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2014 Feb; 32:1:245265.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Krane Kenneth S. Introductory nuclear physics. John Wiley & Sons 1988;:246269.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rutherford E. The scattering of alpha and beta rays by matter and structure of the atom. Philos. Mag. 1911; 6:21:669688.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rutherford E (Paper published by Rutherford in 1899). Uranium radiation and the electrical conduction produced by it. Philos. Mag. 2009; 47:284:109113.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Aharmian F, Akhperjanian A, Barrio J, Bernlohr K, Borst H, Cortina J, Gotting N. The Tev energy spectrum of Markarian 501 measured with sterscopic telescope system of HEGRA during 1998 and 1999. APJ. 2001; 546:2:898.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamada N, Fujmichi Y. Classification of radiation effects for dose limitation purposes: History, current situation, and future prospects. J. Radiat. Res. 2014 Jul; 55:4:629640.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Grupen Claus, Cowan G, Eidelman SD, Stroh T. Astroparticle physics. Springer 2005:p.109.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ, Aleman BM, Edgar AB, Mabuchi K, Murihead CR, Shore RE, Wallace WH. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs: Threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Am. IRCP. 2012 Feb; 41:1-2:1322.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hendry JH. Radiation biology and radiation protection. Am. IRCP. 2012 Oct-Dec; 41:3-4:6471.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Barendson GW, Walter HM, Fowler JF, Bewly DK. Effects of different ionizing radiations on human cells in tissue cultures. Radiat. Res. 1963 Jan; 18::106119.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huda W, Vance A. Patient radiation doses from adult and paediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2001; 176::303306.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wakano JY, Iwasa Y. Evolutionary branching in a finite population: Deterministic branching vs stochastic branching. Genetics. 2013 Jan; 193:1:229241.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Barendson GW. Responses of cultured cells, tumours, and normal tissues to radiations of different linear energy transfer. Radiat. Res. 1968; 4::293356.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Radon in homes. JAMA. 1987; 258668.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: A multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2011 March; 258:3:889905.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dorr W. Radiation effect in normal tissue. Principles of damage and protection. Nuklir Medizin. 2010; 49:Suppl 1:S53S58.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: Application and impact. Radiology. 2005; 235::354358.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McCollough C, Branham T, Herlihy V. Diagnostic reference levels from ACR CT Accreditation Program. J Am. Coll. Radiol. 2011; 8::745803.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wesenberg RL, Amundson GM. Fluroscopy in children: Low exposure technology. Radiology. 1984 Oct; 153:1:243247.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement. Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically guided interventional medical procedures. NCRP Report No. 168, 2010:p.325.
  27. Paolicchi F, Faggioni L, Bastiani L, Molinaro S, Puglioli M, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C. Optimizing the balance between radiation dose and image quality in paediatric head CT: Findings before and after intensive radiologic staff training. American Journal of Roentgenol. 2014 Jun; 202:6:1309.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Angel E, Wellnitz CV, Goodsitt MM. Radiation dose to the foetus for pregnant patients undergoing multi-detector CT imaging: Monte-Carlo simulations estimating foetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size. Radiology. 2008; 249::220227.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Andrade ME, Borras C, Kkoury HJ, Dias SK. Organ doses and risks of computed tomographic examinations. J. Radiol. Prot. 2012 Sept; 32:3:251260.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berden WE. Estimated risks of radiation induced foetal cancer from paediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2001; 176::289296.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Brady AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Bront RL. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Paediatrics. 2007; 120::677682.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS. Minimizing radiation dose for paediatric body applications of single detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2001; 176::303306.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Scott AD, Keegan J, Firmin DN. High-resolution 3D coronary vessel wall imaging with near 100% respiratory efficiency using epicardial fat tracking: Reproducibility and comparison with standard methods. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jan; 33:1:7786.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nielles-Vallespin S, Mekkaoui C, Gatehouse P, Reese TG, Keegan J, Ferreira PF, Collins S, Speier P, Feiweier T, de Silva R, Jackowski MP, Pennell DJ, Sosnovik DE, Firmin D. In vivo diffusion tensor MRI of the human heart: Reproducibility of breath-hold and navigator-based approaches. Magn Reson Med. 2013 Aug; 70:2:454465.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/gcsp.2014.57
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/gcsp.2014.57
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error