References

1. F. Mohr, et al.. TCT-43 Final Five-year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Three-vessel Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012; 60::B13
   [Google Scholar]
2. P. W. Serruys, et al.. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2009; 360::961–72
   [Google Scholar]
3. A. P. Kappetein, et al.. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. European Heart Journal. 2011; 32::2125–134
   [Google Scholar]
4. P. K. Smith. Treatment selection for coronary artery disease: the collision of a belief system with evidence. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2009; 87::1328–31
   [Google Scholar]
5. G. Sianos, et al.. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention: Journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2005; 1::219–27
   [Google Scholar]
6. G. N. Levine, et al.. ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011 :doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
   [Google Scholar]
7. P. Généreux, et al.. SYNTAX score reproducibility and variability between interventional cardiologists, core laboratory technicians, and quantitative coronary measurements. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2011; 4::553–61
   [Google Scholar]
8. D. Capodanno, et al.. Global risk classification and clinical SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) score in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical left main revascularization. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2011; 4::287–97
   [Google Scholar]
9. V. Farooq, et al.. Combined anatomical and clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score. European Heart Journal. 2012. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs295
   [Google Scholar]
10. Taggart D. CABG in 2012: Evidence, practice and the evolution of guidelines. Global Cardiology Science and Practice 2012:18 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/gcsp.2012.18
11. Bonow RO. Guidelines for revascularization: The evidence base matures. Global Cardiology Science and Practice 2012:19 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/gcsp.2012.19