1887
Volume 2012, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2305-7823
  • E-ISSN:
This item has no full text

There is no abstract available for this article.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/gcsp.2012.19
2013-12-01
2019-11-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gcsp/2012/2/gcsp.2012.19.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/gcsp.2012.19&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. F. Mohr, et al.. TCT-43 Final Five-year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Three-vessel Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012; 60::B13
    [Google Scholar]
  2. P. W. Serruys, et al.. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2009; 360::96172
    [Google Scholar]
  3. A. P. Kappetein, et al.. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. European Heart Journal. 2011; 32::2125134
    [Google Scholar]
  4. P. K. Smith. Treatment selection for coronary artery disease: the collision of a belief system with evidence. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2009; 87::132831
    [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Sianos, et al.. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention: Journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2005; 1::21927
    [Google Scholar]
  6. G. N. Levine, et al.. ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011 :doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
    [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Généreux, et al.. SYNTAX score reproducibility and variability between interventional cardiologists, core laboratory technicians, and quantitative coronary measurements. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2011; 4::55361
    [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Capodanno, et al.. Global risk classification and clinical SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) score in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical left main revascularization. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2011; 4::28797
    [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Farooq, et al.. Combined anatomical and clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score. European Heart Journal. 2012. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs295
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Taggart D. CABG in 2012: Evidence, practice and the evolution of guidelines. Global Cardiology Science and Practice 2012:18 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/gcsp.2012.18
  11. Bonow RO. Guidelines for revascularization: The evidence base matures. Global Cardiology Science and Practice 2012:19 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/gcsp.2012.19
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/gcsp.2012.19
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): left main disease , multivessel coronary artery disease , PCI versus CABG and SYNTAX
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error