1887
Volume 2015, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2310-516X

Abstract

The manufacturing course is a common course in most Mechanical and Industrial Engineering programs around the world. In this course, various aspects of product design and manufacturing process selection are discussed. Students are occasionally given the opportunity to utilize and fabricate some parts by using the discussed manufacturing technologies. To bring further appreciation to the course, the Manufacturing Course in Qatar University has added innovation and entrepreneurship with active learning. Instead of teaching the course material in one daunting block, the faculty (mentor) used a “” strategy by integrating engineering theory and product design within a business plan. The students were divided into groups, and each group had to address a societal need within Qatar. The students were given sessions about idea generation tools and creativity techniques. Once the problem had been identified and formulated, these groups were advised and coached to prepare a comprehensive business plan that included selection of materials, manufacturing processes, organizational structure, marketing of the product, market segmentation and penetration, break-even analysis and economic analysis, as well as environmental issues. From the course assessment and student course outcomes surveys, it was found that the interest and learning curve for students increased drastically for this manufacturing course compared to previous approaches. Besides improving the interest and learning curve, the approach had indirectly exposed the student to project management skills, economic analysis, lifelong learning, communication and teamwork. On the whole, the approach was an interesting and led to further enhancing the student's learning process by using different learning styles through varied and innovative teaching techniques.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/eel.2015.7.pp1-5
2015-07-13
2019-11-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eel/2015/1/eel.2015.7.pp1-5.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/eel.2015.7.pp1-5&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Esquivel G. B. 1995;. Teacher behaviors that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7:2, 185202.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Felder R. M., Woods D. R., Stice J. E.Rugarcia A. 2000;. The future of engineering education II: Teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34:1, 2639.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Garvin A. 2006;. Just-in-Time Teaching. Metropolitan Universities, 17:4, 918.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibson K. 2013;. “Generation Z: The next generation of college students”. NIRSA 2013 Annual Conference on March 4-7 Las Vegas.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jolgaf M., Hamouda A. M. S., Sulaiman S.Hamdan M. M. 2003;. Development of a CAD/CAM system for the closed-die forging process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138:1, 436442.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Khair, R., Abdulwahed M., Hamouda, A.M.S., & Hasna, M.O. (2013). From global to local: Investigation of necessary engineering skills for KBE transformation in Qatar in the context of global engineering attributes, Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE, 637–643.
  7. Loveluc L. 2012;. Background Paper Education in Egypt: Key Challenges, Middle East and North Africa Programme, Chatham House, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mrabet, J.G., (2010). “Western Education in the Arabian Gulf: The Costs and Benefits of Reform” in Higher Education and the Middle East: Serving the Knowledge-based Economy, Viewpoint Special Edition; 47–51.
  9. Musharavati, F., & Hamouda, A.M.S. (2010). Project-Based Instruction: Creating Excitement For Learning How To Design Manufacturing Systems, Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Edu Learn 2010, Barcelona, Spain Proceedings, 2695–2706.
  10. Prince M. J.Felder R. M. 2006;. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95:2, 123138.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shawbel D. 2014;. “Why ‘Gen Z’ May Be More Entrepreneurial Than ‘Gen Y’”. Entrepreneurs, February 3. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/231048 [Retrieved 17 May 2015].
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tarlochan F.Hamouda A. M. S. 2015;. “A Framework for Developing Innovative Problem Solving and Design Skills for Engineering Undergraduates” In Mahmoud O. Hasna Mazen Froyd J. E., “Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa”, Springer Science Education (in print: ISBN 978-3-319-15322-3).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/eel.2015.7.pp1-5
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/eel.2015.7.pp1-5
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error