1887
Volume 2014, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2309-3927
  • E-ISSN:

There is no abstract available for this article.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2014.1
2014-11-01
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/difi/2014/1/difi.2014.1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2014.1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Department for Children, Schools and Families. Support for All: The Families and Relationships Green Paper. London: The Stationery Office 2010:p.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Farrington DP, Welsh BC. Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions. New York: Oxford University Press 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Centre for Social Justice. Breakthrough Britain: Ending the Costs of Social Breakdown. London: Centre for Social Justice. Social cohesion – its significance and how it is linked to family cohesion 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ritzen J. Social Cohesion, Public Policy and Economic Growth: Implications for OECD Countries. , paper presented to OECD/HRDC International Symposium on the Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-Being, Quebec Citywww.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/2/1825690.pdf 2000.
  5. Maxwell J. Social dimensions of economic growth. Eric John Hanson Memorial Lecture Series. Vol. 8. Alberta: University of Alberta 1996:p.13.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Almond B. The Fragmenting Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006:p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Giddens A. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press 1992:p.98.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Olson DH, Russell CS, Sprengkle DH. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI theoretical update. In: Olson DHMiller PM, eds. Family Studies Review Yearbook. Vol. 2. New Delhi: Sage 1984:p.60.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. de Tocqueville A. Democracy in America. 2. New York, NY: Vintage Books 1945.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Esping-Andersen G, ed. Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Quinton D. Supporting Parents: Messages from Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Young M. The planners and the planned: The family. J Town Plan Institute. 1954; 60::134142, p 136.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Finch J, Mason J. Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London and New York: Tavistock/Routledge 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson MG, Heller K. Facets of support related to well-being: Quantitative social isolation and perceived family support in a sample of elderly women. Psychol Aging. 1990; 5:4:535544.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bloch M. The Historian's Craft. New York, NY: Vintage 1953:p.41.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dench G. Grandmothers of the Revolution. London: Hera Trust 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Munro A, Manthei B, Small J. Counselling: The Skills of Problem-solving. London: Routledge 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Huriwai T, Robertson PJ, Armstrong D, Kingi TP, Huata P. Whanaungatanga – a process in the treatment of Maori with alcohol- and drug-use related problems. Subst Use Misuse. 2001; 36:8:10331051.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Love C. Family group conferencing: Cultural origins, sharing, and appropriation: A Maori reflection. In: Burford GHudson J, eds. Family Group Conferencing: New Directions in Community-Centred Child and Family Practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nixon P, Burford G, Quinn A. A Survey of International Practices, Policy and Research on Family Group Conferencing and Related Practices. Englewood: American Humane Association 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Griggs J. Reluctant family change in Ireland. In: Appleton LHantrais L, eds. Sixth Series IPROSEC (Improving Policy Responses and Outcomes to Socio-Economic Challenges). : Paper 6: European Case Studies in Family Change, Policy and Practice, European Research Centre, Loughborough University 2003:p.38.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Monaghan E, Such E, Ackers M. Hands-On Family Policy in the UK. In: Appleton LHantrais L, op cit eds. 2003.
  23. Bogenschneider K. Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of US family policy in the 1990s. J Marriage Fam. 2000; 62:4:11361159.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Blum R. Critical issues for the family research agenda and their use in policy formulation. In: Hendershot GELeClere FB, eds. Family Health: From Data to Policy. Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family Relations 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. United Nations Programme on the Family. Family Policy in a Changing World: Promoting Social Protection and Intergenerational Solidarity, Report of the Expert Group Meeting, Doha, Qatar 14–16 April 2009www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/meetings/egmreportdoha09.pdf(Accessed July 6, 2013) 2009.
  26. Moen P, Schorr AL. Families and social policy. In: Sussman MBSteinmetz SK, eds. Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Plenum 1987:p.795.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamerman SB, Kahn AJ. Families and the idea of family policy. In: Kamerman SBKahn AJ, eds. Family Policy: Government and Families in Fourteen Countries. New York: Columbia University Press 1978:p.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ibid.
  29. Consortium of Family Organizations. What is a family policy perspective and why is it needed? Family Policy Report. 1990; 1::16 Ooms, T (1990) ‘Families and government: Implementing a family perspective in public policy’, Social Thought, 16 (2) 61–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ooms, 1990, op cit.
  31. Glynn M. Father Deficit, Young People and Substance Misuse. London: Addaction 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hareven T. Recent research on the history of the family. In: Drake M, ed. Time, Family and Community: Perspectives on Family and Community History. Buckingham: Open University Press 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Institute for Family Policies. Report on the Evolution of the Family in Europe 2008. Madrid: IPF 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hantrais L. Family Policy Matters: Responding to Family Change in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press 2004:p.67.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. OECD. Family Database, SF1.1: Family size and household composition, Table SF1.1.B: Households with children. Paris: http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/42293876.xls. Accessed April 10, 2013 OECD 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hudson J, Lowe S. Understanding the Policy Process: Analysing Welfare Policy and Practice. 2nd ed. Bristol: Policy Press 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heffernan R. The possible as the art of politics: Understanding consensus politics. Polit Stud. 2002; 50::742760, p750.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Relationships Foundation. Counting the Cost of Family Failure 2013 Update (Research Note). Cambridge: Relationships Foundation 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Evans M, Cerny P. Globalisation and social policy. In: Ellison NPierson C, eds. Developments in British Social Policy. 2. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ibid, p21.
  41. Jessop B. From the KWNS to the SWPR. In: Lewis GGewirtz SClarke J, eds. Rethinking Social Policy. London: Sage 2000:p.182.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hudson and Lowe, op cit.
  43. Rowthorn R, Webster D. Male Worklessness and the Rise of Lone Parenthood in Britain. Oxford Centre for Population Research, Working Paper No. 31, 2006.
  44. Wilson WJ. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hirsch D. Does the Tax and Benefit System Create a ‘Couple Penalty’? : University of Loughborough /Joseph Rowntree Foundation ; Francesconi, M, Rainer, H and van der Klaauw, W (2009) ‘The effects of in-work benefit reform in Britain on couples: Theory and evidence’, The Economic Journal 119 (535) 66–100 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Centre for Social Justice. Dynamic Benefits: Towards Welfare That Works. London: Centre for Social Justice 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Office of National Statistics. Nomis: 2011 Census, ks105ew Household Composition. London: https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/. Accessed May 17, 2013 Office of National Statistics 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Department for Work and Pensions. Joint birth registration: promoting parental responsibility. , CM7160, p5http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/dwp/2007/joint-registration-of-births-gp.pdf8 2007.
  49. Elliott J, Vaitilingham R. Now We Are 50: Key Findings From the Child Development Study. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Cunningham-Burley SMcKie L, eds. Families in Society: Boundaries and Relationships. Bristol: Policy Press 2005:p.5.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Walker J. Supporting Families in Democratic Societies: Public Concerns and Private Realities. , keynote paper at 53rd ICCFR International Conference Families and Democracy: Compatibility, Incompatibility, Opportunity or Challenge? Lyon, France 2006.
  52. Walker, op cit and Williams, F.. Rethinking Families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Williams, op cit.
  54. Chaplin R, Flatley J, Smith K. Home Office Statistical Bulletin: Crime in England and Wales 2010/11. London: www.homeoffice.gov.uk. Accessed July 4, 2012 Home Office 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilson B, Clarke S. Remarriages: A demographic profile. J Fam Issues. 1992; 13::123141.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Juby H, Le Bourdais C, Marcil-Gratton N. A Step Further: Parenthood in Blended Families. Montréal: Centre interuniversitaire d'études démographiques 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Walker J., ed. Information Meetings an Associated Provisions within the Family Law Act 1996: Final Evaluation Report. London: ; Walker, J, McCarthy, P, Stark, C, Laing, K (2004) Picking up the Pieces: Marriage and Divorce Two Years after Information Provision, London: Department for Constitutional Affairs Lord Chancellor's Department 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Mansfield P. The missing link in parenting education and support. One Plus One: The Bulletin. 2004; 8:2:1011.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Callan S, et al., Fractured Families – the State of the Nation Report, Vol 2 of Breakdown Britain, Interim Report from the Social Justice Policy Group. London: Centre for Social Justice 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Walker (2006) op cit.
  61. Centre for Social Justice. Fractured Families: why stability matters. London: Centre for Social Justice 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. LinkAge Bristol provides an excellent city-wide example of this in the UK details for which are. http://www.linkagebristol.org.uk. Accessed July 6, 2013.
  63. Pricewaterhouse Coopers. DfES Children's Services Review of Capacity in the Parenting Support Market. London: PwC 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Hochschild A. The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley, CA: ; Lan, PC (2006) Global Cinderellas: Migrant Domestics and Newly Rich Employers in Taiwan, Durham: Duke University Press University of California Press 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. United Nations. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cmw.htm(Accessed June 27, 2010) 1990.
  66. Bailey R. Letting Children be Children: Report of an Independent Review of the Commercialisation and Sexualisation of Childhood, Department for Education, Cmnd 8078. London: Department for Education 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Bourdieu P. On the family as a realised category. Theory Cult Soc. 1996; 13:3:1926.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Dench G. Rediscovering Family. : Hera Trust 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Centre for Social Justice. Every Family Matters: an in-depth review of family law in Britain. London: Centre for Social Justice 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Squires M. The Cambridge Edition of the works of DH Lawrence, Lady Chatterley's lover and Apropos of ‘Lady Chatterley's lover’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002:p.321.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/difi.2014.1
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error