1887
  1. الرئيسية
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. QScience Connect
  4. المجلد 2012, العدد 1
  5. المقالة
Volume 2012, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2223-506X

ملخص

Abstract

The study of phytoplankton diversity and its seasonal variation was carried out by sampling water taken from the Santragachi Lake, of West Bengal between November 2009 and July 2010. Various physico-chemical variables were recorded and the correlation of this with phytoplankton density was established using Canonical Correspondence Analysis. This showed that the density of phytoplankton was higher when temperature and nutrients were increased. A total of 29 phytoplankton taxa belonging to Chlorophyta (10), Cyanobacteria (8), Charophyta (5), Bacillariophyta (4), and Euglenozoa (2) were recorded from nine samples taken within the study period. Chlorophyta species dominated mostly in variety and percentage composition while Euglenozoa species representatives had the least expression. Bio-indication showed a low diverse community in the monsoon period with better water quality than in pre- and post-monsoon seasons. Various diversity indices (Shannon–Wiener diversity index, Gleason species richness index, Pielou evenness index, and Naughton dominance index) were used to establish the seasonal variation of phytoplankton. The Shannon–Wiener diversity index was most useful in indicating the trophic status of the water as well as the pollution status, which in this case, depicted a moderate level of pollution of this lake.

© 2012 Ghosh, Barinova & Keshri, licensee Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals.
Loading

جارٍ تحميل قياسات المقالة...

/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3
٢٠١٢-٠٥-٠٨
٢٠٢٤-٠٥-١٨
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/connect/2012/1/connect.2012.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Veereshakumar, NS, & Homani, SP (2006). Algal biodiversity in freshwater and related to physico-chemical factors. Nat Environ Pollut Technol, 5:, 37–40.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  2. Kartha, SD, & Rao, KS (1992). Environmental status of Gandhi sagar reservoir. Fish Technol Soc India, 29:, 14–20.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  3. Ravikumar, M, Manjappa, S, Kiran, BR, & Puttaiah, ET (2006). Phytoplankton periodicity in relation to abiotic factors in Kulahalli tank near Harapanahalli, Karnataka. Nat Environ Pollut Technol, 5:, 157–161.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  4. Nural Alom, M, & Zaman, M (2006). Physico-chemical characteristics of a large lentic water body in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Nat Environ Pollut Technol, 5:(3), 441–446.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  5. Tiwari, D, & Shukla, M (2007). Algal biodiversity and trophic status of some temporary water bodies of Kampur. Nat Environ Pollut Technol, 6:, 85–90.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  6. Sridhar, R, Thangaradjou, T, Senthil Kumar, S, & Kannan, L (2006). Water quality and phytoplankton characteristics in the Palk Bay, southeast coast of India. J Environ Biol, 27:, 561–566.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  7. Goldman, CR, & Horne, AJ (1983). Limnology. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, N.Y.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  8. Paramasivan, M, & Sreenivasan, A (1981). Changes in algal flora due to pollution in Cauvery river. Indian J Environ Health, 23:, 222–238.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  9. Mani, P, & Krishnamurthy, K (1989). Variation of phytoplankton in a tropical estuary (Vellar Estuary, Bay of Bengal, India). Int Revre Ges Hydrobiol, 74:(1), 109–115.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  10. Umamaheswara Rao, M, & Sarojini, Y (1992). Composition, abundance and vertical distribution of phytoplankton and fungi off Krishna and Godavari river mouths, eastcoast of India. India J Mar Sci, 21:(2), 128–132.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  11. Palmer, CM. Algae and water pollution, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. EPA-600/9-77-036. 1977.
  12. Shubert, LE Algae as ecological indicators, Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, USA, 1984.
  13. Vaulot, D, & Phytoplankton,  (2001). Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Nature Publishing Group, London. http://www.els.net
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  14. Forsberg, C. (1982). Limnological research can improve and reduce the cost of monitoring and control of water quality. Hydrobiol, 86:, 143–146.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  15. Gaikwad, SR, Tarot, SR, & Chavan, TP (2004). Diversity of Phytoplankton and zooplankton with respect to pollution status of river Tapi in North Maharastra region. J Curr Sci, 5:, 749–754.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  16. Devassy, VP, & Goss, JI (1988). Phytoplankton community structure and succession in tropical estuarine complex (Central West Cost of India). Estuarine, Costal Shelf Sci, 27:, 671–685.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  17. Trivedy, RK, & Goel, PK (1984). Chemical and Biological Methods for Water Pollution Studies. Environm. Pub, Karad, India.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  18. Michael, P (1984). Ecological Methods for Field and Laboratory Investigations. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd, New Delhi, India.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  19. APHA, AWWA and WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21 st edition. Published jointly by the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, 2005.
  20. Smith, GM (1950). The Freshwater Algae of the United States. McGraw Hill, New York, USA.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  21. Prescott, GW (1962). Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. Brown Company Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  22. Desikachary, TV (1959). Cyanophyta. Indian Council of Agricultural Research. New Delhi.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  23. Turner, WB (1982). The freshwater algae of East India. K Svenska Vetensk Akad Handle, 25:(5), 1–187.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  24. Anand, N (1998). Indian Freshwater Microalgae. Bishen Singh Mahendrapal Singh Publishers
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  25. Cox, EJ (1996). Identification of Freshwater Diatom Live Material. Chapman and Hall, London.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  26. Guiry, MD, & Guiry, GM (2011). AlgaeBase. World-wide Electronic Publication, Galway. National University of Ireland Press
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  27. Barinova, SS, Medvedeva, LA, & Anissimova, OV Diversity of algal indicators in environmental assessment, Tel Aviv: Pilies Studio, 2006, In Russian. http://herba.msu.ru/algae/materials/book/bioind/title.html.
  28. Ter Braak, CJF, & Van Dam, H (1989). Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods. Hydrobiologia, 178:, 209–223.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  29. Van Dam, H, Martens, A, & Sinkeldam, J (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal Aquatic Ecology, 28:(1), 117–133.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  30. Odum, EP (1969). The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164:, 262–270.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  31. Gleason, HA (1922). On the relation between species and area. Ecology, 3:, 156–162.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  32. Pielou, EC (1967). The use of information theory in the study of the diversity of biological pollutions, Proc. 5th Berkeley symp. Math Stat Prob, 4:, 163–177.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  33. McNaughton, SJ (1967). Relationships among functional properties of Californian grassland. Nature, 216:(5111), 168–169.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  34. Ignatiades, L, & Mimicos, N (1977). Ecological responses of phytoplankton on chronic oil pollution. Environ Pollut, 13:, 109–117.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  35. ter Braak, CJF, & Šmilauer, P (2002). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power Press, Ithaca.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  36. ter Braak, CJF (1990). Interpreting canonical correlation analysis through biplots of structural correlations and weights. Psychometrica, 55:, 519–531.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  37. ter Braak, CJF (1987). The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio, 69:, 69–77.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  38. Hustedt, F (1938–1939). Systematisch und ökologische Untersuchungen über die Diatomeenflora von Java, Bali und Sumatra. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl, 15:, 131–177. 393–506, 638–790; 16 : 1–155, 274–394
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  39. Hustedt, F (1957). Die Diatomeenflora des Flußsystems der Weser im Gebiet der Hansestadt Bremen. Abhandl Naturw Ver Bremen, 34:, 181–440.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  40. Watanabe, T, Asai, K, & Houki, A (1986). Numerical estimation to organic pollution of flowing water by using the epilithic diatom assemblage—Diatom Assemblage Index (DAIpo). Sci Total Environ, 55:, 209–218.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  41. Sládeèek, V (1986). Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol, 14:, 555–566.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  42. European Parliament, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, 2000; OJL 327 : 1–72.
  43. Maeda, H, Kawai, A, & Tilzes, M (1992). The water bloom of cyanobacteiral picoplankton in lake Biwa, Japan. Hydrobiologia, 248:, 93–103.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  44. Bailey-Watts, AE (1982). The composition and abundance of phytoplankton in Loch Leven (Scotland) 1977–1979 and a comparison with succession in earlier years. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol Hydrogr, 67:, 1–25.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  45. Scheffer, M (1998). Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Chapman and Hall, London.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  46. Riegman, R, Colijn, F, Malschert, JEP, Hoosterhuis, HT, & Codee, GC (1990). Assessment of growth rate limiting nutrients in the North sea by the use of nutrient uptake kinetics. Neth J Sea Res, 26:(1), 53–60.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  47. El-Gindy, AAH, & Dorham, MM (1992). Interactions of phytoplankton chlorophyll and physico-chemical factors in Arabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman during summer. Indian J Mar Sci, 21:(1), 233–306.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  48. Melack, JM (1979). Temporal variability of phytoplankton in tropical lakes. Oecologia, 44:, l–7
     [Google الباحث العلمي]
  49. Dhande, JS, & Jawale, AK (2011). Genus- Homoeothrix (Thuret) Kirchner (Cyanophyceae) from Hartala Lake, Maharashtra. Journal of Experimental Sciences, 2:(4), 07–08.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  50. Hubble, DS, & Harper, DM (2002). Nutrient control of phytoplankton production in Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 488:, 99–105.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  51. Stockner, JG, & Shortreed, KS (1988). Response of Anabaena and Synechococcus to manipulation of nitrogen: phosphorus ration in a lake fertilization experiment. Limnol Oceanogr, 33:, 1348–1361.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  52. Johnson, MG, & Brinkhurst, RO (1971). Associations and Species Diversity in Benthic Macroinvertebrates of Bay of Quinte and Lake Ontario. J Fish Res Board Canada, 28:(11), 1683–1697.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  53. Patrick, R (1967). The effect of invasion rate, species pool and size of area on the structure of diatom community. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 58:, 133–142.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
  54. Wilham, JL, & Dorris, TC (1968). Biological parameters for water quality criteria. Bioscience, 18:, 447–481.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3
Loading
Diversity and seasonal variation of phytoplankton community in the Santragachi Lake, West Bengal, India
QScience Connect 2012, 3 (٢٠١٢); https://doi.org/10.5339/connect.2012.3
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2012.3
Loading

جارٍ تحميل البيانات والوسائط...

  • نوع المستند: Research Article
الموضوعات الرئيسية CCA, Diversity, Phytoplankton, Santragachi Lake, India and Seasonal variation

الأكثر اقتباسًا لهذا الشهر Most Cited RSS feed

هذه الخانة مطلوبة
يُرجى إدخال عنوان بريد إلكتروني صالح
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error