oa Developing, implementing and improving learning outcomes assessment in Qatar's public higher education

References

1. Harden RM, Crosby JR, Davis MH. An introduction to outcome-based education. Med Teacher. 1999; 21:1:7–14.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
2. Ewell PT. An emerging scholarship: a brief history of assessment. In Banta TW et al. Building Scholarship of Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2002.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
3. Spady WG. Outcome-based Education. ACSA report no 5. Belconnen: Australian Curriculum Studies Association 1993.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
4. Ruhland SK, Brewer JA. Implementing an assessment plan to document student learning in a two-year technical college. J Voc Educ Res. 2001; 26::141–171.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
5. Banta TW, et al., Building a Scholarship of Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2002.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
6. Barr RB, Tagg J. From teaching to learning: a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change. 1995; 27:6:13–25.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
7. Froyd J, Simpson N. Student-centered Learning: Addressing Faculty Question about Student-Centered Learning. Presented at the Course, Curriculum, Labor, and Improvement Conference, Washington, DC, 2008;. Retrieved from http://ccliconference.org/files/2010/03/Froyd_Stu-CenteredLearning.pdf .
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
8. Knight P, Trowler P. Departmental Leadership for Higher Education: New Directions for Communities of Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE 2001.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
9. Maclellan E, Soden R. The significance of knowledge in learning: a psychologically informed analysis of higher education students' perceptions. IJSoTL. 2007; 1:1:1–18.
   [Google الباحث العلمي]
10. National Research Council. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 2000.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
11. Suskie L. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2009.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
12. Anderson LW. Curricular alignment: a re-examination. Theor Pract. 2002; 41:4:255–260.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
13. Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ. 1996; 32::247–364.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
14. Biggs J. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. High Educ Res Dev. 1999; 18:1:57–75.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
15. Biggs J. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. High Educ Res Dev. 2012; 31:1:39–55.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
16. Cohen SA. Instructional alignment: searching for a magic bullet. Educ Res. 1987; 16::16–20.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
17. Devlin M, Samarawickrema G. The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. High Educ Res Dev. 2010; 29:2:111–124.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
18. Kember D, McNaught C. Enhancing University Teaching: Lessons from Research into Award-winning Teachers. Abingdon: Oxon 2007;. Routledge.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
19. McGehee JJ, Griffith LK. Large-scale assessments combined with curriculum alignment: agents of change. Theor Pract. 2001; 40:2:137–144.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
20. Squires D. Curriculum alignment research suggests that alignment can improve student achievement. VTCH. 2012; 85:4:113–129.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
21. Zakaria FS, Awaisu A. Instructional design and assessment shared-learning experience during a clinical pharmacy practice experience. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011; 75:4:1–6.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
22. Ekman R, Pelletier S. Assessing student learning: a work in progress. Change. 2008; 40:4:14–19.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
23. Leveille DE. An Emerging view on Accountability in American Higher Education. Berkely: University of California at Berkely. Center for Studies in Higher Education 2005.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
24. Peterson M, Einarson MK. What are colleges doing about student assessment? Does it make a difference? J High Educ. 2001; 72:6:629–669.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
25. Pike GR. Assessment measures; Making accountability transparent: next steps for the voluntary system of accountability. Assessment Update. 2008; 20:2:8–9, 12.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
26. Kuh GD. Risky business: promises and pitfalls of institutional transparency. Change. 2007; 39:1:31–35.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
27. Shulman LS. ounting and recounting: assessment and the quest for accountability. Change. 2007; 39:1:20–25.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
28. United Nations Development Programme/Regional Bureau for Arab States (UNDP/RBAS). Quality Assessment of Education Programmes in Arab Universities Regional Overview Report. New York 2006.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
29. Al Attiyah A, Khalifa B. Small steps lead to quality assurance and enhancement in Qatar University. Qual High Educ. 2009; 15:1:33–34.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
30. In: Bloom BS, ed. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals – Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay 1956.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
31. In: Anderson LWKrathwohl DRAirasian PWCruikshank KAMayer REPaul RPintrich RPRaths JWittrock MC, eds. A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing—A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Complete edition. New York: Longman, 2001.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
32. Munzenmaier C, Rubin N. Perspectives Bloom's Taxonomy: What's Old is New Again. Santa Rosa: The ELearning Guild 2013.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
33. Academic Evaluation Office. Final Review Report of Students Learning Outcomes. Qatar: Qatar University (Unpublished) 2007.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
34. Zu X, Fredendall LD, Douglas TJ. The evolving theory of quality management: the role of Six Sigma. J Oper Manage. 2008; 26:5:630–650.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
35. Harry MJ, Schroeder R. Six Sigma, The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing The World's Top Corporations. New York: Doubleday, Random House 1999.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
36. Pande PS, Neuman RP, Cavanagh RR. The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance. New York: McGraw-Hill 2000.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
37. Brady JE, Allen TT. Six Sigma literature: a review and agenda for future research. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2006; 22::335–367.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
38. Tjahjono B, Ball P. Six Sigma: a literature review. Int J Lean Six Sigma. 2010; 1:3:216–233.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
39. Aboelmaged MG. Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 2010; 27:3:268–317.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
40. Jung-Lang Cheng. Implementing Six Sigma via TQM improvement: an empirical study in Taiwan. TQM J. 2008; 20:3:182–195.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
41. Preeprem N, Hendry L. Exploring the six sigma phenomenon using multiple case study evidence. Int J Oper Prod Man. 2008; 28:3:279–303.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
42. Academic Program and Learning Outcomes assessment office. The General Learning Outcome Assessment Process Guidebook at Qatar University. Qatar: Qatar University 2010.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
43. University-Wide Program learning Outcomes Assessment Committee. Assessment Report For Selected Academic Programs at Qatar University 2008-2009 Academic Year. Qatar: Qatar University, UWPLOA. (Unpublished) 2009.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
44. Kezar A. Institutionalizing student outcomes assessment: the need for better research to inform practice. Innov High Educ. 2013; 38::189–206.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
45. Maher A. Learning outcomes in higher education: implications for curriculum design and student learning. JoHLSTE. 2004; 3:2:46–54.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
46. Magruder J, McManis M, Young C. The right idea and the right time: Development of a transformational assessment culture. In: Gray PJBanta TW, eds. The Campus-Level Impact of Assessment, Progress Problems and Possibilities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1997;:17–29.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
47. Mentkowski M. Creating a context where institutional assessment yields educational improvement. J Gen Educ. 1991; 40::255–283.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
48. Rust C. The impact of assessment on student learning: how can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centered assessment practices? Act Learn High Educ. 2002; 3::145–158.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
49. Volkwein JF, Lattuca LR, Harper BJ, Domingo RJ. Measuring the impact of professional accreditation on student experiences and learning outcomes. Res High Educ. 2007; 48:2:251–282.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
50. Banta TW, et al., Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1993.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
51. Banta TW, Lund JP, Black KE, Oblander FW. Assessment in Practice: Putting Principles to Work on College Campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1996.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
52. Bresciani MJ. Outcomes-Based Academic and Co-Curricular Program Review. Compilation of Institutional Good Practices. Sterling, VA: Stylus 2006.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
53. Bresciani MJ. Assessing Student learning in General Education: Good Practice case studies. Bolton, MA: Anker 2007.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
54. Kuh GD, Gonyea RM, Rodriguez D. The scholarly assessment of student development. In: Banta TW, ed. Building a Scholarship of Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2002.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
55. Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. Handbook Statistics. 2006; 26::81–124.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]
56. Wang Ping. The inter-rater reliability in scoring composition. English Lang Teach. 2009; 2:3:39–43.
    [Google الباحث العلمي]