1887

Abstract

The projected impact of nanotechnology has been touted as a second industrial revolution—not the third, fourth, or fifth, because despite similar predictions for technologies such as computers and robotics, nothing has yet eclipsed the first. In the United States and in many other countries, numerous partnerships among industry, university, and government have been created to facilitate the research, development, and commercialization of nanotechnology advances. Such a collaboration is expected to bring about next generation of nanotechnology based products and new markets with a promise of job creation and economic development. According to the National Science Foundation (NSF), products incorporating nanotechnology will contribute approximately $1 trillion to the global economy by the year 2015. About two million workers will be employed in nanotechnology industries, and three times that many will have supporting jobs. Despite many benefits of nanotechnology there are potential risks and ethical issues involved in its implementation. There's a concern that some nanoparticles could be toxic because elements at the nanoscale behave differently than they do in their bulk form and these particles could easily cross the blood-brain barrier.

Society is at the threshold of a revolution that will transform the ways in which materials and products are created. How will this revolution develop? The opportunities that will develop in the future will depend significantly upon the ways in which a number of challenges are met. As we design systems on a nanoscale, we develop the capability to redesign the structure of all materials—natural and synthetic—along with rethinking the new possibilities of the reconstruction of any and all materials. Such a change in our design power represents tremendous social and ethical questions. In order to enable our future leadership to make decisions for sustainable economic nanotechnological development, it is imperative that we educate all nanotechnology stakeholders about the short-term and long-term benefits, limitations and risks of nanotechnology. The social implications of nanotechnology encompass so many fundamental areas such as ethics, privacy, environment, and security. This paper presents an overview of new and emerging nanotechnologies and their societal and ethical implications to address 21st Century challenges and issues. The discussion includes a range of different types of nanotechnologies and their potential social and ethical implications on society. The paper also highlights the approaches used to teach Science, Technology and Society (STS) courses at DeVry University, Addison, IL, USA.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.57
2015-08-29
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2015/4/qproc.2015.elc2014.57.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.57&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Minoli Daniel. Nanotechnology Applications to Telecommunications and Networking. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fonash, Stephen . The Overall Picture: The World of Nanotechnology. Hands-on nanofabrication workshop for educators, Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization, Penn State University, December 2–4. 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Khan Ahmed S. Nanotechnology: Ethical and Social Implications. CRC Press 2012;:12-20226.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaudry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, Aitken R, Watkins R. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit. Contam. 2008; 25:3:241258.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FAO/WHO Report. 2009;. Expert Meeting on the Application of Nanotechnologies in the Food and Agriculture Sectors: Potential Food Safety Implications. Available online: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/meetings/nano_june09/en .
  6. Moore Fiona. Implications of Nanotechnology Applications: Using Genetics as a Lesson. Health Law Review. 2004; 10:3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Khan Ahmed S. Examining the Impact of Nanotechnologies for Science, Technology, and Society (STS) Students. 2006 ASEE Conference Proceedings. Chicago. IL 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Drexler, Eric . The Challenge of Nanotechnology. 1989;. Viewed April 28, 2009. Available online: http://www.halcyon.com/nanojbl/NanoConProc/nanocon1.html#anchor528648 .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. WHO. IPCS Risk assessment terminology, World health Organization (WHO); 2007. January 14 (2007), accessed September 19, 2011. Available online: http://www.who.int/ipcs/methods/harmonixation/areas/ipcsterminologyparts1and2.pdf .
  10. Sutton Victoria. Nanotechnology law and policy. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press 2011:p.38.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.57
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.57
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error