1887

Abstract

Despite the attractive features of ICT in education, and the many advantages that successful use of these technological resources can offer to the education sector in general, their use in engineering educational content delivery is still lagging behind other educational disciplines. In this paper we look closely at the challenges that face full utilization of these technology resources in engineering educational content delivery, the great opportunities that ICT can offer, and actions that can be taken to overcome the challenges. The challenges are exemplified in: the quantitative nature of engineering discipline, lack of awareness of pedagogical use of ICT in education and the lack of clear policy of how and what type of engineering educational content delivery mode can benefit most from available ICT resources. Opportunities available for full utilization of ICT facilities are summarized in: the wide availability of computing resources, high speed internet access and general ICT knowhow among the young generations of both students and instructors among others. Actions to be taken for proper utilization of ICT resources in engineering education are given, and Blended Mode of learning, which combines face-to-face with online learning, is suggested as the most suitable mode for engineering educational content delivery.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.4
2014-07-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2014/3/qproc.2014.wcee2013.4.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.4&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Czerniewicz L, Brown C. The uses of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in teaching and learning in South African higher education practices in the Western Cape. Perspect Educ. 2005; 23:4:118.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hammond N, Bennett C. Discipline differences in role and use of ICT to support group-based learning. J Comput Assist Lear. 2002; 18:1:5563.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Williams D, Coles L, Wilson K, Richardson A, Tuson J. Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs. Brit J Educ Technol. 2000; 31:4:307320.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown C, Czerniewicz L. Disciplinary differences in the use of educational technology. e/merge 2006 Conference: Southern Africa, 10–21 July 2006.
  5. UNESCO Report. Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development. UNESCO Publishing 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kabouridis G. An assessment of ICT-based education for mechanical engineering in TEI Patras Greece. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference in Networked Learning. 2008;:829835. ISBN 978-1-86220206-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Braz MHLB, Siqueira SWM, Melo RN. Information and Communication Technology for Supporting Civil Engineering Education. International Conference on Engineering Education. Valencia, Spain, July, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Anis H. E-learning in engineering education – General challenges and the Egyptian experience. In: Education in a Changing Environment (ECE) 6th International Conference: Creativity and Engagement in Higher Education. Greater Manchester, UK: The University of Salford 6–8 July 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zacharia ZC. Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. J Comput Assist Lear. 2007; 23:2:120132.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zacharia ZC, Olympiou G, Papaevripidou M. Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. J Res Sci Teach. 2008; 45:9:10211035.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Winn W, Stahr F, Sarason C, Fruland R, Oppenheimer P, Lee Y-L. Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea. J Res Sci Teach. 2006; 43::2542.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Olympiou G, Zacharia ZC. Implementing a blended combination of physical and virtual laboratory manipulatives to enhance students' learning through experimentation in the domain of Light and Color. J Educ Inform Cybern. 2010; 2:1:4953, ISDN: 1943-7978.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kulacki FA, Krueger ER. International Trends in Engineering Education. In: Scvarda LC, ed. Proceedings, International Conference on Engineering Education. 1998;. Pontifical Catholic University, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil (CD ROM Format). Journal of Education, Informatics and Cybernetics, Vol 2, No. 1, pp 49 -53, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ABET – Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Engineering Accreditation Commissions Publications. USA. 2009.
  15. Lioyd-Smith L. Exploring the Advantages of Blended Instruction at Community Colleges and Technical schools. MERLOT J Online Lear Teach. June 2010; 6:2.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elaine Allen I, Seaman J, Garret R. Blending in: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Available at: http://sloanconsortium.org/site/default/files/Blending_In.pdf  Sloan Consortium 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. McCormick R, Scrimshaw P. Information and communication technology, knowledge and pedagogy. Commun Inform. 2001; 1::3757.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.4
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.4
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received: 18 January 2014
  • Accepted: 30 April 2014
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error