1887
Volume 2007, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to review the maternal and neonatal outcome in pregnant diabetic women given a trial of labor and delivered macrosomic infants (>4000 grams) and to assess the accuracy of birth weight prediction by ultrasound examination at term.

Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine charts of pregnant diabetic women were reviewed, sixty eight women were given a trial of labor and delivered macrosomic fetuses (>4000 grams), fifty of them had vaginal delivery and the other eighteen had caesarean delivery. In the other group, 61 patients delivered by elective caesarean section, for 41 of them the indication was fetal macrosomia (>4000 grams) as estimated by ultrasound examination and in the other 20, it was due to clinical estimation of big baby. Maternal and neonatal complications were reviewed in each group. Maternal complications included lacerations, hemorrhage and infection and the neonatal complications evaluated were shoulder dystocia and associated birth trauma, asphyxia, and mortality. The accuracy of ultrasound in estimating fetal weight was also evaluated.

Results: Sixty eight (52.7%) women attempted a trial of labor; 73.5% delivered vaginally and 26.5% had a caesarean delivery. All, except two, had macrosomic fetuses (>4000 grams). Only one woman, of those who delivered vaginally, had postpartum hemorrhage due to atonic uterus. The incidence of shoulder dystocia for infants weighing 4000-4499 grams was 6.3% and those infants had the same incidence (6.3%) of brachial plexus injury. There was no perinatal asphyxia or perinatal mortality among those infants who were delivered vaginally. There were no maternal complications for women who had caesarean delivery after labor (18 patients) but there was perinatal asphyxia in two infants who were treated properly without any neurological sequele. Elective caesarean delivery was performed in 47.3% of the study population. There were no neonatal complications or perinatal mortality in this group of patients and only one woman had wound infection. The sonographic prediction of fetal weight was accurate in 52.4% of the cases. The over estimation was in 50.8% of the estimated fetal weights and 49.2% of them were underestimated when compared to actual birth weights.

Conclusions: Caution should be taken in the use of sonographic estimations of fetal weight to guide obstetric decisions concerning labor and delivery. Special consideration should be given to diabetic patients having fetuses with estimatedfetal weights between 4000 and 4500 grams. Flexibility in the management of these patients is best, taking in consideration their previous obstetric performance and if the estimated fetal weight is closer to 4500grams than to 4000 grams, it is perhaps, better to proceed to a primary caesarean delivery.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2007.1.12
2007-06-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman FA. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 66::762768.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Acker DB, Gregory KD, Sacha BP, Friedman FA. Risk factors or Erb-Duchenne Palsy. Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 71::389392.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Conway DL. Choosing route of delivery for the macrosomic infant of a diabetic mother: caesarean section versus vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2002; 12::442448.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kehl RJ, Krew MA, Thomas A, et al., Fetal growth and body composition in infants of women with diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996; 5::273280.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Modanlou HD, Komatsu G, Dorchester W, et al., Large for gestational age neonates: anthropometric reasons for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 60::417423.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tamura RK, Saffagha RE, Dooley SL, Vaisrub N, Socol ML, Depp R. Real time ultrasound estimation of weight in fetuses of diabetic gravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 153::5760.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. London MB. Prenatal diagnosis of macrosomia in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Med. 2000; 9::5254.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements - a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151::333337.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Fearneyhough TC, Deter RL, Park SK, Rossavik IK. Use of femur length abdominal circumference ratio in detecting the macrosomic fetus. Radiology. 1985; 154::503505.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH. Sonographic determination of fetal weights in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156::441444.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Benedetti TJ, Gabbe SG. Shoulder dystocia: A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 52::526529.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A. Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing > 4000 grams be delivered by caesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165::831837.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sandmire MF, O'Hallion TJ. Shoulder dystocia: Its incidence and associated risk factors. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1988; 26::6573.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Delpapa EH, Mueller-Heubach E. Pregnancy outcome following ultrasound diagnosis of macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78::340343.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McFarland LV, Raskin M, Dating JR, Benedetti TJ. Erb Duchenne's Palsy: A consequence of fetal macrosomia and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 68::784788.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nocon JJ, Mckenzie DK, Thomas LJ. Shoulder dystocia: Ananalysis of risks and obstetric maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168::17321739.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon M, Rich H, Deutschberger J, Green M. The immediate and long-term outcome of obstetric birth trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973; 117::5156.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2007.1.12
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error