1887
Volume 2016, Issue 1
  • EISSN: 1703-1958

Abstract

Public schools at all levels in Kuwait are gender-segregated due to conservative traditional values, but such segregation is not practiced in private schools. In the past decade, a series of laws were passed to impose gender segregation in private universities as well. A concern about the psychological and social impact of gender segregation on students is a topic of ongoing debate in Kuwait. Research into the effects of gender segregation on social aspects such as peer relations remains an area to be explored. The purpose of this study is to assess whether there is a difference in peer relations with the opposite or same gender among individuals who have attended Kuwaiti schools across different school settings, and to explore which factors such as physical appearance, general esteem, parental relations, and spiritual values/religion might influence this difference. Seventy-six participants (57% female; 43% male) in Kuwait aged between 18 and 39 years filled out an online questionnaire incorporating scales related to the variables of interest taken from Marsh's Self-Description Questionnaire III. The results showed that participants who attended a mixed-gender school, as opposed to a segregated school, in Kuwait scored significantly higher on the peer relations with the opposite gender criteria, meaning that they believed they had good relationships with peers of the opposite gender ( = 44.1;  < 0.05). The results showed that school setting was a significant predictor of peer relations with the opposite gender (β = 0.251,  < 0.05); however, when additional factors such as self-esteem, parental relations, physical appearance, and spiritual values/religion were controlled for, schooling was not found to be a significant predictor of peer relations, and self-esteem had the highest significant relationship with peer relations of the same and opposite gender as well (β = 0.461,  < 0.01; β = 0.623,  < 0.001). Spiritual values/religion had a significant relationship with peer relations of the same gender only and not the opposite gender, meaning the more religious the individuals believed they were, the less they thought that they had good relationships with peers of the same gender (β = − 0.295,  < 0.01). Self-esteem scores were highly significantly correlated with parental relations scores and physical appearance scores ( = 0.605;  = 0.577;  < 0.01). The implications of the data on educational policy as well as the importance of spreading awareness about the significant relationship that self-esteem and spiritual values/religion can have with peer relations in Kuwait are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/nmejre.2016.3
2016-06-28
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nmejre/2016/1/nmejre.2016.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/nmejre.2016.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abu-Saad I. Self-esteem among Arab adolescents in Israel. The Journal of Social Psychology. 1999; 139:4:479486, doi: 10.1080/00224549909598407 .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed R, Rohner R, Khaleque A, Gielen U. Parental Acceptance and Rejection: Theory, Measures, and Research in the Arab World. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 514028. 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Algharabali N. Two Cultures, One Room: Investigating Language and Gender in Kuwait. Queen Mary: University of London 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Birkeland M, Breivik K, Wold B. Peer acceptance protects global self-esteem from negative effects of low closeness to parents during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2014; 43::7080.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop J. Peer acceptance and friendship: An investigation of their relation to self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence. 1995; 15:4:476489.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Attachment, Vol. 1. New York: Basic; 1969.
  7. Brown BB . Adolescents' relationships with peers. In: Lerner RM & Steinberg L, eds. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004:363–394.
  8. Dinkha J, Mobasher S, El-Shamsy N. Psychological impact of gender segregation. Psychology and Education. 2010; 47:1–2:2334.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Drury K, Bukowski WM, Velásquez AM, Stella-Lopez L. Victimization and gender identity in single-sex and mixed-sex schools: Examining contextual variations in pressure to conform to gender norms. Sex Roles, this issue; 2012. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0118-6 .
  10. Erarslan AB, Rankin B. Gender role attitudes of female students in single-sex and coeducational high schools in Istanbul. Sex Roles, this issue 2013;. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0277-0 .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Erikson EH. Insight and responsibility. New York: Norton; 1964.
  12. Field A. Discovering Statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Foley S. The Arab Gulf States, Beyond Oil and Islam. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers 2010;:167200.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Georgiou M, Meins E. Relations between peer attachment, self-esteem, and perceived parental bonding in Greek Cypriot and British young adults. The Cyprus Review. 2010; 22:1:6177.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill PC, Pargament KI, Hood RW, McCullough ME, Swyers JP, Larson DB, et al.. Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. 2000; 30::5277.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hurtado S, Milem JF, Clayton-Pedersen A, Allen W. Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. Review of Higher Education. 1998; 21:3:279302.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Marsh H. Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1989a; 81:3:417430.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsh H. SDQIII Manual. Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia: The University of Western Sydney 1989b.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Oetzel JG. Self-construals, communication processes, and group outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Small Group Research. 2001; 32::1952. doi:10.1177/104649640103200102 .
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rizzuto A-M. The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979.
  21. Roehlkepartain E, King P, Wagener L, Benson P. The Handbook of Spiritual Development in Childhood and Adolescence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.
  23. Signorella M, Bigler R. Single-sex schooling: Bridging science and school boards in educational policy. Sex Roles. 2013; 69::349355.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Simmons R . Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls. Mariner Books; 2003.
  25. Smithers A, Robinson P. The paradox of single-sex and co-educational schooling. liverpool: Crown Printing Company; 2006:1–40.
  26. Spencer B, Barrett C, Storti G, Cole M. Only girls who want fat legs take the elevator: Body image in single-sex and mixed-sex colleges. Sex Roles, this issue; 2012. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0189-4 .
  27. State of Kuwait Central Statistical Bureau. Percentage Distribution of Population by Marital Status 1995. 1995;. Retrieved from http://www.csb.gov.kw .
    [Google Scholar]
  28. State of Kuwait Central Statistical Bureau. Estimated Mid-Year Population by Nationality & Sex 2005. 2005;. Retrieved from http://www.csb.gov.kw .
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stocker J. Self-Description Questionnaire: Adaptation to Emirati High Schools. Advances in Computers and Technology for Education: Educational Technologies Series. 2015; 14::7886.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sullivan HS. The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton; 1953.
  31. Tolmie A, Muijs D, McAteer E. Quantitative Methods in Educational and Social Research. Berkshire: McGraw Hill 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wiseman A. A culture of (in)equality?: A cross-national study of gender parity and gender segregation in national school systems. Research In Comparative & International Education. 2008; 3:2:179201, Retrieved from http://www.wwwords.co.uk/RCIE .
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/nmejre.2016.3
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/nmejre.2016.3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Kuwaitparentspeersreligionsegregation and self-esteem
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error