1887
Volume 2014, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2311-8148
  • EISSN:

Abstract

The proliferation and shifts of culture across generations is a topic that affects national policy, distribution of economic controls, and social norms that dictate what young people choose to do and what to not do. In the case of the Republic of Turkey, a large facet of culture has been built on the civil-military dynamic that puts the Turkish Armed Forces as guardians of the nation from both foreign threat and domestic cultural shifts. However, the recent emergence of civilian control over the military puts this cultural role in question. This paper examines the spheres of higher education, conscription, and media, three areas the military has typically used to socialize youth, and what the effect of civilian control has been. This research found that the AKP-led government has chosen to assimilate militarism in socialization of youth, and that has deep implications for the educational, vocational, and military structures young Turks will enter.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/messa.2014.5
2014-06-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/messa/2014/1/messa.2014.5.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/messa.2014.5&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. “2013 Press Freedom Index,”, Reporters Without Borders, 2013:p.23.
  2. “List of Arrested Military Officers in the Turkish military cases” State Department, Unclassified Document.
  3. “Shady group had office at YOK during 1997 coup,”, Today's Zaman. 29 March 2013. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. “Turkish military court recognizes conscientious objection for the first time”, Hurriyet Daily New. 9 March 2012. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. “University numbers on the rise in Turkey 2011,”, Hurriyet Daily News. 4 September 2011. Online Article 87, Section 5 of 1924 constitution: “Primary education is obligatory for all Turks and shall be gratuitous in the government schools” Source: JSTOR.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Constitution of the Republic of Turkey. 1982.
  7. European Commission. Turkey 2010 Progress Report. 9 November 2011:p.24.
  8. Reforms curb Turkey's armed forces,”, The Washington Times. June 25, 2005. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Turkish Armed Forces official website www.tsk.tr ..
  10. Alam Anwar. Islam and Post-Modernism: Locating the Rise of Islamism in Turkey. Journal of Islamic Studies. 2009. 20:3:352375.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Boulton Ralph, Hafezi Parisa. Analysis: Turkey's history of military coups hangs over protests. Reuters. 12 June 2013. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cagaptay Soner, Akin Unver H. July 2007 Turkish Elections: Winners and Fault Lines. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. July 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cagaptay Soner. Testing Turkey: Why War in Syria could bring Ankara and Washington Closer. Foreign Affairs Magazine. May 28 2013. The Council on Foreign Relations, Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cleveland William L, Bunton Martin. A History of the Modern Middle East. Fifth Edition 2013. 169170.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Curtis Andy. Nationalism in the Diaspora: A Study of the Kurdish movement. : University of Utrecht February 4, 2005.
  16. Earle Edward M.. The New Constitution of Turkey. Political Science Quarterly. March, 1925. 40:1:77100.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Finkel Andrew. What's 4+4+4? New York Times. 23 March 2012. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones Dorian. Turkey Considers Allowing Conscientious Objection to Military Service. Voice of America. 22 November 2011. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kenes Bulent. Amending Article 35 and our captivity. Today's Zaman. July 14, 2013. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Koker Tolga. The Establishment of Kemalist Secularism in Turkey. Middle East Law and Governance. 2009. 1:2:3537.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuru Ahmet. The Rise and Fall of Military Tutelage in Turkey: Fears of Islamism, Kurdism and Communism. Insight Turkey. 2012. 14:2:4546.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Oberdiek Helmut. Holding Armed Groups Accountable A comparative study of obstacles and strategies: The situation in Turkey. The International Council on Human Rights Policy. 1999. 2224.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sarigil Zeki. Deconstructing the Popularity of the Turkish Armed Forces. Armed Forces and Society. Aug. 2008. 30:4:718.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sarigil Zeki. Public Opinion and Attitude towards the Military and Democratic Consolidation in Turkey. Working paper, 2013:p.14.
  25. Schiff Rebecca L.. Civil-military relations reconsidered: A theory of concordance. Armed Forces and Society. Sept. 22, 1995. 22:1:724.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Turgut Perlin. Erdogan's Showdown with Generals Shows Advance of Turkey's Democracy. Time Magazine. August 3, 2011. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Varoglu A, Bicaksiz A. Volunteering for Risk: The Culture of the Turkish Armed Forces. Armed Forces & Society. 2005. 31:4:585.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Zalewski Piotr. The Turkish Media's Darkest Hour: How Erdogan Got the Protest Coverage He Wanted. Foreign Affairs Magazine. June 14, 2013. The Council on Foreign Relations, Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ziflioğlu Vercihan. Turkish minorities condemn ‘Our Pledge’ but fear speaking out. Hurriyet Daily News. August 15, 2011. Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zurcher Erik-Zan. The Ottoman Conscription System In Theory and Practice 1844–1918. International Review of Social History. 1998. 43:3:437449.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/messa.2014.5
Loading

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error