1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care
  4. Volume 2017, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 2017, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1999-7086
  • EISSN: 1999-7094

Abstract

Over 85% of chest injuries requiring surgical intervention can be managed with tube thoracostomy/intercostal catheter (ICC) insertion alone. However, complication rates of ICC insertion have been reported in the literature to be as high as 37%. Insertional complications, including the incorrect identification of the safe zone chest wall location for ICC placement, are common issues, with up to 41% of insertions occurring outside of this safe area. A new biometric approach using the patient's proportional skeletal upper limb anatomy to allow correct identification of the chest wall skin site for ICC insertion may reduce complications. The aim of this study was to examine the performance of the mid-arm point (MAP) method in identifying the safe zone for ICC insertion. Thirty healthy volunteers were recruited from The Alfred Hospital, a Level I Adult Trauma Centre in Melbourne, Australia. Blinded investigators used the MAP to measure the mid-point of the adducted arm of each volunteer bilaterally. A skin marking was placed on the anterior axillary line of the adjacent chest wall, and with the arm then abducted to 90 degrees, the underlying intercostal space was identified. Using the MAP method, all of the 120 measurements fell within the ‘safe zone’ of the fourth to sixth intercostal spaces bilaterally. The median intercostal space identified was the fifth space, with investigators finding this in 86% of measurements independent of age, sex, height, weight or side. A simple technique using the MAP is a reliable marker for the identification of the safe zone for ICC insertion in healthy volunteers. The clinical utility for patients undergoing pleural decompression and drainage needs prospective evaluation.

© 2017 Bing, Fitzgerald, Olaussen, Finnegan, O'Reilly, Gocentas, Stergiou, Korin, Marasco, McGiffin, licensee HBKU Press.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2017.3
2017-05-12
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2017/1/jemtac.2017.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2017.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leading Causes of Death: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 2015; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/overview/leading_cod.html .
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ekpe EE, Eyo C. Determinants of mortality in chest trauma patients. Niger J Surg. 2014; 20:1:30–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Luchette FA, Barrie PS, Oswanski MF, Spain DA, Mullins CD, Palumbo F, Pasquale MD. Practice management guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use in tube thoracostomy for traumatic hemopneumothorax: The EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2000; 48:4:753–757.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Sethuraman KN, Duong D, Mehta S, Director T, Crawford D, St. George J, Rathlev NK. Complications of tube thoracostomy placement in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2011; 40:1:14–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter P, Conroy S, Blakeney J, Sood B. Identifying the site for intercostal catheter insertion in the emergency department: Is clinical examination reliable? Emerg Med Australas. 2014; 26:5:450–454.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Waydhas C, Sauerland S. Pre-hospital pleural decompression and chest tube placement after blunt trauma: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2007; 72:1:11–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Millikan JS, Moore EE, Steiner E, Aragon G, Van Way CW. Complications of tube thoracostomy for acute trauma. Am J Surg. 1980; 140:6:738–741.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Fleishman JA, Bullock JD, Rosset JS, Beck RW. Iatrogenic Horner's syndrome secondary to chest tube thoracostomy. J Neuroophthalmol. 1983; 3:3:205–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bowness J, Kilgour P, Whiten S, Parkin I, Mooney J, Driscoll P. Guidelines for chest drain insertion may not prevent damage to abdominal viscera. Emerg Med J. 2014; 32:8:620–625.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Remérand F, Luce V, Badachi Y, Lu Q, Bouhemad B, Rouby J-J. Incidence of chest tube malposition in the critically ill: A prospective computed tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106:6:1112–1119.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lim K-E, Tai S-C, Chan C-Y, Hsu Y-Y, Hsu W-C, Lin B-C, Lee K-T. Diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes after emergency tube thoracostomy: Is computed tomography more accurate than chest radiograph? Clin Imaging. 2005; 29:6:401–405.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Stark DD, Federle MP, Goodman PC. CT and radiographic assessment of tube thoracostomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983; 141:2:253–258.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffiths JR, Roberts N. Do junior doctors know where to insert chest drains safely? Postgrad Med J. 2005; 81:957:456–458.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Elsayed H, Roberts R, Emadi M, Whittle I, Shackcloth M. Chest drain insertion is not a harmless procedure – are we doing it safely? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010; 11:6:745–748.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kong VY, Clarke DL. The spectrum of visceral injuries secondary to misplaced intercostal chest drains: Experience from a high volume trauma service in South Africa. Injury. 2014; 45:9:1435–1439.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kong V, Oosthuizen G, Sartorius B, Keene C, Clarke D. An audit of the complications of intercostal chest drain insertion in a high volume trauma service in South Africa. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014; 96:8:609–613.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kerger H, Blaettner T, Froehlich C, Ernst J, Frietsch T, Isselhorst C, Nguyen AK, Volz A, Fiedler F, Genzwuerker HV. Perforation of the left atrium by a chest tube in a patient with cardiomegaly: Management of a rare, but life-threatening complication. Resuscitation. 2007; 74:1:178–182.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Alfred Health. Caring for the Severely Injured in Australia: Inaugural Report of the Australian Trauma Registry 2010 to 2012. Melbourne, VIC: Alfred Health 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Heng K, Bystrzycki A, Fitzgerald M, Gocentas R, Bernard S, Niggemeyer L, Cooper DJ, Kossmann T. Complications of intercostal catheter insertion using EMST techniques for chest trauma. ANZ J Surg. 2004; 74:6:420–423.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gosselin RA, Spiegel DA, Coughlin R, Zirkle LG. Injuries: The neglected burden in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2009; 87:4:246–246a.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. McDonell A, Aitken P, Elcock M, Veitch C. The organisation of trauma services for rural Australia. AJP. 2012; 7:2:7.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones R, Hollingsworth J. Tension pneumothoraces not responding to needle thoracocentesis. Emerg Med J. 2002; 19:2:176–177.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Schroeder E, Valdez C, Krauthamer A, Khati N, Rasmus J, Amdur R, Brindle K, Sarani B. Average chest wall thickness at two anatomic locations in trauma patients. Injury. 2013; 44:9:1183–1185.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dominguez KM, Ekeh AP, Tchorz KM, Woods RJ, Walusimbi MS, Saxe JM, McCarthy MC. Is routine tube thoracostomy necessary after prehospital needle decompression for tension pneumothorax? Am J Surg. 2013; 205:3:329–332.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Deakin C, Davies G, Wilson A. Simple thoracostomy avoids chest drain insertion in prehospital trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1995; 39:2:373–374.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2017.3
Loading
Identifying a safe site for intercostal catheter insertion using the mid-arm point (MAP)
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care 2017, 3 (2017); https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2017.3
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2017.3
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2017.3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): emergency medicine, Intercostal catheter, pleural decompression and pneumothorax

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error