1887
Volume 2014, Issue 1
  • EISSN: 2223-506X

Abstract

Laundering of textile garments is taken for granted worldwide, employing conventional washing machines to provide the physical effort exerted to remove dirt and debris from garments. In this study, the conventional washing technique and the advanced ultrasonic washing technique were analysed and compared by using several different types of fabrics. The thermal diffusivity, tensile strength and the breaking extension properties of the fabrics were tested and analysed to determine the laundering effects on the selected fabric properties. Both the conventional and the ultrasonic washed fabrics under dry and wet state were directly analysed and compared. It was observed that, the dry state of the fabrics reflected superior thermal diffusivity values in comparison to the wet state of the fabrics. The tensile strength and breaking extension of the washed fabrics were strongly affected by both washing processes. There is a significant decrease in their strength and breaking extension properties when the fabrics were washed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2014.2
2014-02-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/connect/2014/1/connect.2014.2.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2014.2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Warmoeskerken MMC, van der Vlist P, Moholkar V, Nierstrasz V. Laundry process intensification by ultrasound. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2002; 210:2-3:277285.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sun D, Guo Q, Liu X. Investigation into dyeing acceleration efficiency of ultrasound energy. Ultrasonics. 2010; 50: 4-5:441446.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallego-Juarez JA. High-power ultrasonic processing: Recent developments and prospective advances. Phys Procedia. 2010; 3:1:3547.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Akalin M, Merdan N, Kocak D, Usta I. Effects of ultrasonic energy on the wash fastness of reactive dyes. Ultrasonics. 2004; 42:1-9:161164.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Canoğlu S, Gültekin BC, Yükseloğlu SM. Effect of ultrasonic energy in washing of medical surgery gowns. Ultrasonics. 2004; 42:1-9:113119.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Uzun M, Patel I. Mechanical properties of ultrasonic washed organic and traditional cotton yarns. JAMME. 2010; 43:2:608612.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hes L. Non-destruction determination of comfort parameters during marketing functional garment and clothing. IJFTR. 2008; 33::239245.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kawabata S, Niwa M, Yamashita Y. A guideline for manufacturing “ideal fabrics.”. Int J Cloth Sci Tech. 1999; 11:2/3:134144.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Le CV, Ly NG, Postle R. Heat and moisture transfer in textile assemblies: part I: steaming of wool, cotton, nylon, and polyester fabric beds. Text Res J. 1995; 65:4:203212.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Milenkovic L, Skundric P, Sokolovic R, Nikolic T. Comfort properties of defence protective clothing. Sci J Facta Universitatis. 1999; 1:4:101106.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Watkins DA, Slater K. 2—The moisture-vapour permeability of textile fabrics. J Text Inst. 1981; 72:1:1118.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li Y. The science of clothing comfort. Text Prog. 2001; 31:1-2:1135.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wan X, Fan J, Wu H. Measurement of thermal radiative properties of penguin down and other fibrous materials using FTIR. Polym Test. 2009; 28:7:673679.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Majumdar A, Mukhopadhyay S, Yadav R. Thermal properties of knitted fabrics made from cotton and regenerated bamboo cellulosic fibres. Int J Therm Sci. 2010; 49:10:20422048.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hes L, Offermann P, Dvorakova I. The effect of underwear on thermal contact feeling caused by dressing up and wearing of garments. Tecnitex. 2003; 2001::236245.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BS EN 12127:1998. Textiles. Fabrics. Determination of mass per unit area using small samples. ISBN 0 580 29132 4. British Standard Institute. 1998.
  17. Textiles. Test methods for nonwovens. Part 2: Determination of thickness. BS EN ISO 9073-2:1997. British Standard Institute. 1997.
  18. Reinforcements – Woven fabrics – Determination of number of yarns per unit length of warp and weft. ISO 4602:2010.
  19. Pereira S, Anand SC, Rajendran S, Wood C. A Study of the Structure and Properties of Novel Fabrics for Knee Braces. J Ind Text. 2007; 36:4:279300.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Alambeta Measuring Device: Users' Guide Version 2.3. Sensora Instrument Liberec, Company Brochure.
  21. Splendore R, Dotti F, Cravello B, Ferri A. Thermo-physiological comfort of a PES fabric with incorporated activated carbon: Part I: preliminary physical analysis. Int J Cloth Sci Technol. 2010; 22:5:333342.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2014.2
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2014.2
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error