1887
Volume 2025, Issue 1
  • EISSN: 2223-506X

Abstract

This research examines the contradictions between Islamic law and international human rights law, on issues such as civil and political rights, gender equality, and religious freedoms. It investigates how Islamic law interacts with international human rights norms and seeks to understand the potential for reconciling these two legal systems. This research is important because growing global dialogue and legal integration require a better understanding of how different legal traditions can coexist and inform one another. The study employs a comparative analytical approach, critically analysing key documents and existing literature. The main sources of international law analysed in this paper are the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which are compared to Sharia-based (as derived from the Quran and Sunnah) legal instruments. Concurrently, their foundational principles are compared to identify the differences leading to conflicting interpretations and trace the potential for compatibility of Islamic law and international human rights. The research draws on the experience of Muslim-majority MENA countries as case studies, with a focus on Gulf states, to explore the intersections and tensions between Sharia law and international human rights. To anchor the discussion, postcolonial legal theory is used as a theoretical framework. The findings reveal that while there are apparent contradictions between Sharia law and international human rights, these are often overstated. Islamic jurisprudence contains provisions that protect fundamental human rights, but tensions arise primarily due to differing interpretations of gender equality and civil rights. The study also highlights how contemporary Islamic legal scholars are using ijtihad to reinterpret traditional Sharia provisions in ways that align more closely with international human rights standards. This study contributes to the broader debate on the compatibility of Islamic law and international human rights and offers insights into how Islamic law can evolve through reinterpretation to meet international human rights expectations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.3
2025-09-18
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/connect/2025/1/connect.2025.issue1.3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Fadel MH. Public reason as a strategy for principles reconciliation: the case of Islamic law and international human rights law. Chicago Journal of International Law. 2007;8:(1)Art.3. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol8/iss1/3
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Khan I. Islamic human rights: Islamic law and International Human Rights standards. Appeal. 1999;5:74–85
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Pauw M. Women’s rights: from bad to worse? Assessing the evolution of incompatible reservations to the CEDAW Convention. Merkourios. 2013;29:(77):51–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. European Court of Human Rights (HUDOC). Refeh Partisi (the Welfare Party) v Turkey [2003] ECHR 87. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-59617%22]}
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berween M. The fundamental human rights: an Islamic perspective. International Journal of Human Rights. 2002;6:(1):61–79. doi: 10.1080/714003742
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hafiz-Falak SF, Hafiz-Sfarish A. The core principles of Islamic jurisprudence within legal theory: a comprehensive analysis. Online Journal of Research in Islamic Studies. 2024;11:(2):57–72. doi: 10.22452/ris.vol11no2.4
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rehman J. Islam and human rights: is compatibility achievable between the Sharia and human rights law? SSRN; 2014. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2373930
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Saeed A. Human rights and Islamic legal sources. In: Saeed A. (ed.) Human Rights and Islam: an introduction to key debates between Islamic law and International Human Rights Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schacherreiter J. Postcolonial Theory and Comparative Law: on the methodological and epistemological benefits to Comparative Law through Postcolonial Theory. Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 2016;49:(3):291–312. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26160083
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Igwenagu UR. The concept of cultural relativism of human rights. SSRN; 2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4272442
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blackburn RL. Cultural relativism in the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council. ICIP Working Papers; 2011:2011–03. https://www.icip.cat/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/wp11_03_eng.pdf
  12. Marneros C. Defensive relativism: the use of cultural relativism in International Legal Practice. Contemporary Political Theory. 2023;24:157–160. doi: 10.1057/s41296-023-00662-0
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris-Short S. International human rights law? Imperialist, inept and ineffective? Human Rights Quarterly. 2003;25:(1):130–181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20069656
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Emon A. Shari’a and the modern state. In: Glahn B, Emon A, Ellis M. (eds.) Islamic Law and International Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.p.67–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bhat AHuk-Haq IU. Islam and the issue of human rights: compatibility or contradiction. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2023;2:(2):599–612. doi: 10.55927/eajmr.v2i2.2093
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Menski WF. Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saeed A. (ed.) Human Rights and Islam: An Introduction to Key Debates between Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shahab A. What Is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Robinson K. Understanding Sharia: The Intersection of Islam and the Law. Council on Foreign Relations; 2021. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/understanding-sharia-intersection-islam-and-law
    [Google Scholar]
  20. De Roover J. Europe, India, and the Limits of Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gutterman AS. What are human rights? SSRN; 2023. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4320947
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Macklem P. What is International human rights law? McGill Law Journal. 2007;52:575–604
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kälin WKünzli J. The Law of International Human Rights Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Emon AAhmed R. The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Salaymeh L. Decolonial translation: destabilizing coloniality in secular translations of Islamic law. Journal of Islamic Ethics. 2021;5:250–277. doi: 10.1163/24685542-12340054
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Prozesky M. Is the concept of human rights logically permissible in theistic religion? Journal for the Study of Religion. 1989;2:(2):17–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24764092
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Donelly J. Human rights and human dignity: an analytic critique of non-Western conception of human rights. American Political Science Review. 1982;76:(2):303–316. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1961111
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Glahn B, Emon A, Ellis M. Islamic Law and International Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Entelis J. International Human Rights: Islam’s Friend or Foe? Fordham International Law Journal. 1996;20:(4):1251–1305. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol20/iss4/7
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Glenn HP. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nabeel R. Conceptions of legitimacy under international human rights law and Islamic Rights Law. Indonesian Journal of International Law. 2024;21:(2):Art.1. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijil/vol21/iss2/1
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Peters R. Islamic law and human rights: a contribution to an ongoing debate. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations. 1999;10:5–9. doi: 10.1080/09596419908721166
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Alhargan RA. Islamic law and International Human Rights Norms. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights. 2013;9:(1). doi: 10.1515/mwjhr-2013-0010
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sebar HIsmail SM. The use of flogging as a punishment in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of international human rights law. IIUM Law Journal. 2021;21:(1):77–102. doi: 10.31436/iiumlj.v29i1.609
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ellis M. Islamic and International Law: convergence or conflict? In: Glahn B, Emon A, Ellis M. (eds.) Islamic Law and International Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 91–103. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641444.003.0005
    [Google Scholar]
  36. An-Na’im AA. Islam and Human Rights: Beyond the Zero-Sum Game. ABC Religion and Ethics; 2018. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/islam-and-human-rights-beyond-the-zero-sum-game/10094826
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mayer AE. Universal versus Islamic human rights: a clash of cultures or a clash with a construct? Michichan Journal of International Law. 1994;15:(2):308–404. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol15/iss2/1
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoyle C. Efforts Towards Abolition of the Death Penalty: Challenges and Prospects. Death Penalty Research Unit, Research Papers 2023;1.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Human Rights Library (University of Minnesota). Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam,Aug. 5, 1990, U.N. GAOR,World Conf. on Hum. Rts., 4th Sess., Agenda Item 5, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.157/PC/62/Add.18 (1993) [English translation].5. https://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/cairodeclaration.html
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Corlatean T. The incompatibility of the Sharia law and the Cairo Declaration on human rights in Islam with the European Convention on Human Rights. In Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies Proceedings of the 12th International RAIS Conference, April 3-4, 2019. Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies; 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Augustauskaitė-Keršienė A. Reservations to UN human rights treaties: sovereign states seeking to avoid their obligations? International Comparative Jurisprudence. 2020;6:(2):118–133. doi: 10.13165/j.icj.2020.12.002
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kimberly VBMuhammadin FM. Sharia reservations to CEDAW: a critical analysis. UiTM International Conference on Law & Society. 2021:38–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mullally S. CEDAW reservations and contested equality claims; 2023. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.9783/9781512823578-007/pdf?licenseType=restricted [Accessed 1 August 2025].
  44. Baderin MA. International Human Rights and Islamic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Valeiša T. Compatibility of Islamic law with internationally accepted human rights. PhD thesis. Ghent University; 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Nyazee IA. Islamic law and human rights. Islamabad Law Review. 2003;1:(1-2):13–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. OHCHR. Committee on Rights of Child Concludes Examination of Initial Report of Qatar; 2009. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2009/10/committee-rights-child-concludes-examination-initial-report-qatar [Accessed 26 June 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kassim L. Qatari family law: when custom meets Shari′a. In: Wing A, Kassim H. (eds.) Family Law and Gender in the Middle East and North Africa: Change and Stasis Since the Arab Spring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). Qatar: partial withdrawal of reservation; 2009. https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en#EndD [Accessed 1 May 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Human Rights Watch. Qatar: submission to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child; 2023. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/02/15/qatar-submission-un-committee-rights-child [Accessed 1 August 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  51. UN Geneva. Experts of the Committee on the Rights of the Child Praise Qatar’s Investments in Child Health and Education; 2025. https://www.ungeneva.org/en/news-media/meeting-summary/2025/05/examen-du-qatar-au-crc-lengagement-du-pays-enversles-droits-de [Accessed 26 June 2025].
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Yassari N, Möller L-M, Gallala-Arndt I. (eds.) Parental Care and the Best Interests of the Child in Muslim Countries. New York: Springer; 2017.
  53. Eslami R. A system of human rights in Islam? Journal of Human Rights. 2021;15:(1):20–21. doi: 10.22096/HR.2020.521266.1275
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Dye MB. Qatar: the pearl of the Middle East and its role in the advancement of women’s rights. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review. 2007;84:(5):747–764.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Fakih A, Haimoun N, Kassem M. Youth unemployment, gender and institutions during transition: evidence from the Arab Spring. Social Indicators Research. 2020;150:(1):311–336. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02300-3
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Zaidan E, Ehsan MM. Women’s labor and business participation in the GCC: a comparative analysis of Qatar, Bahrain, and the UAE. Cogent Social Sciences. 2025;11:(1):2499900. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2025.2499900
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Naguib R, Aref A. Empowering women through public sector employment in Qatar: challenges and opportunities. In: Naguib R. (ed.) Women’s Empowerment and Public Policy in the Arab Gulf States. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p.75–106. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-6006-4_4
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Office of High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Hilal L. The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam and international women’s rights. Circles: Buffalo Women’s Journal of Law & Social Policy. 1997;5:85–87. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/circles/vol5/iss1/15
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Duderija A. Contemporary Muslim male reformist thought and gender equality affirmative interpretations of Islam. Feminist Theology. 2020;28:(2):161–181. doi: 10.1177/0966735019886076
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Hasan H, Jahar AS, Umar N, Abdullah I. Polygamy: uncovering the effect of patriarchal ideology on gender-biased interpretation. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies. 2022;78:(4):a7970. doi: 10.4102/hts.v78i4.7970
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Almahfali M, Avery H. Human rights from an Islamic perspective: a critical review of Arabic peer-reviewed articles. Social Sciences. 2023;12:(2):106. doi: 10.3390/socsci12020106
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Mol AY. Islamic human rights discourse and hermeneutics of continuity. Journal of Islamic Ethics. 2019;3:1–2. doi: 10.1163/24685542-12340031
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Morgan-Foster J. Third generation rights: what Islamic law can teach the international human rights movement. Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal. 2005;8:67–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Bassin G. The agony of human rights: a discussion and evaluation of the illusive consensus. PhD thesis. University of New South Wales; 2007
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Olowu D. Children’s rights, international human rights and the promise of Islamic legal theory. Law, Democracy & Development. 2008;12:(2):62–85. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC60276
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Fahlevy M. Can we reconcile the universal human rights with Islam. International Journal of Islamic Studies. 2018;5:(1). doi: 10.20859/JAR.V5I1.198
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/connect.2025.3
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): international human rights lawIslamic lawrejectionist views and Sharia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error