Abstract

One of the primary objectives of most undergraduate engineering programs is to prepare graduates for engineering practice. Advances in engineering methods and technology, modern system complexity, and the need to work across cultures and time zones have influenced significant change in the practice of engineering. Unfortunately, there has been little change in engineering education to accommodate these changes. In this paper, we propose that engineering educators alter the typical lecture style and instructional activities focused on the individual, and use a team-based case method approach to transform their programs, so that throughout a curriculum teams of students engage in realistic engineering practice activities, centered around a comprehensive life-cycle engineering case study. The authors illustrate this approach with a life-cycle software engineering case study.

Keywords: case study teaching ; engineering education ; software engineering
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.25
2014-07-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qproc/2014/3/qproc.2014.wcee2013.25.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.25&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Felder R, Brenta R, Princeb A. Engineering instructional development: programs, best practices, and recommendations. J Eng Educ. 2011; 100:1:89122.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Passow H. Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? J Eng Educ. 2012; 101:1:95118.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hilburn T, Towhidnejad M, Salamah S. A life-cycle engineering case study. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, 2012;:191195.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hammond J. Learning by the Case Method. Boston, MA: HBS Publishing Division, Harvard Business School 1976.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Herreid C. Case studies in science: a novel method of science education. J Coll Sci Teach. 1994; 23:4:221229.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis C, Wilcock E. Teaching Materials Using Case Studies. UK Centre for Materials Education, http://www.materials.ac.uk/guides/casestudies.asp, accessed February 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2011-2012 Accreditation Cycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET Inc., October 30, 2010.
  8. Friedman G, Sage A. Case studies of systems engineering and management in systems acquisition. Syst Eng. 2004; 7:1:8496.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Salamah S, Towhidnejad M, Hilburn T. Developing case modules for teaching software engineering and computer science concepts. Proceedings of 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference, October, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fagan M. Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst J. 1976; 15:3:258287, 744–751.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hilburn T, Towhidnejad M, Salamah S. Read Before You Write. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, May, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diaz-Herrera JHilburn T, eds. Software Engineering 2004: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering, Computing Curriculum Series. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) & IEEE Computer Society (IEEE-CS), 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.25
Loading
/content/papers/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.25
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed