Volume 2022, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency is a worldwide public health concern, which can lead to severe diseases, such as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. Most studies have compared equimolar unit-to-unit doses of vitamin D2 and D3.

Objectives: The current study aimed to answer the research question: “How effective is vitamin D2 (600,000 U/1.5 ml) compared to vitamin D3 (300,000 U/1 ml) parenteral supplementation for raising serum vitamin D levels in adult patients treated in a primary health care setting?”

Setting: Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC) runs 28 health centers distributed throughout the State of Qatar and its capital city, Doha. Qatar is on the east coast of the Arabic peninsula, with very hot and sunny summers and a desert climate.

Study design: This was a retrospective observational cohort study.

Method: A total of 15,716 participants were recruited following ethical approval. They were identified by electronic medical records (EMR) describing the clinical encounters of individuals aged 18 to 60-years-old who attended a health center operated by the PHCC during the 3.5-year study period from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2020. The PHCC EMR system uses SNOMED codes (a systematically organized computer-processable collection of medical terms providing codes, names, synonyms, and definitions implemented for clinical documentation and reporting). Four study groups were created depending on the type of vitamin D injection and the oral form of replacement therapy. The analysis scheme used the serum vitamin D level within the preceding 4 weeks (pretreatment), followed by administration of the treatment dose. The post-treatment serum testing value should have been available within a maximum of 12 weeks. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBMSPSS; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) version 23 software was used for the statistical analysis.

Results: Four treatment options were compared, including a vitamin D2 injection, a vitamin D3 injection, combined use of a vitamin D2 injection + a D2 tablet, and combined use of a vitamin D3 injection + a D2 tablet. All four treatment groups were associated with a statistically significant increase in serum vitamin D within a maximum of 12 weeks of follow-up. The vitamin D2 injection alone was associated with the lowest increase in serum concentration by a mean of 3.2 ng/ml. In contrast, the vitamin D3 injection alone or with a D2 tablet increased serum vitamin D by 6.1 and 5.6 ng/ml, respectively. Using the combination of a vitamin D2 injection and a tablet only added a marginal increase of 2.3 ng/ml in serum vitamin D on top of the 3.2 ng/ml increase attained after administering the D2 injection alone.

Conclusion: Utilizing vitamin D3 in an injectable form is the best choice to restore severe vitamin D deficiency. Furthermore, it was superior to the injectable form of vitamin D2, even though vitamin D2 has double the molar units.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2022.35
2022-08-02
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qmj/2022/3/qmj.2022.35.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2022.35&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Heaney RP, Weaver CM. Overview of vitamin D. Diet Ref Intakes Calcium Vitam D 2003;:32:75–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanco A, Blanco G. Medical biochemistry. J Med Biochem 2017;:185–188 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton B. Vitamin D and human skeletal muscle. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20:(2):182–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mozos I, Marginean O. Links between vitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular diseases. BioMed Res Int 2015;:2015:109275.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tsoucalas G, Sgantzos M. Mediterranean. Journal 2017;28:(4):223–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sadiya A, Ahmed SM, Skaria S, Abusnana S. Vitamin D status and its relationship with metabolic markers in persons with obesity and type 2 diabetes in the UAE: A cross-sectional study. J Diabetes Res 2014;:2014:869307.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pani MA, Knapp M, Donner H, Braun J, Baur MP, Usadel KH, Badenhoop K. Vitamin D receptor allele combinations influence genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes in Germans. Diabetes 2000; 49:(3):504–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Craik C. Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem. Bone 2008; 23:(1):1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zainel AAL, Qotba H, Al Nuaimi A, Syed M. Vitamin D status among adults (18–65 years old) attending primary healthcare centres in Qatar: A cross-sectional analysis of the Electronic Medical Records for the year 2017. BMJ Open 2019; 9:(8):e029334.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Al-Saleh Y, Al-Daghri NM, Khan N, Alfawaz H, Al-Othman AM, Alokail MS, Chrousos GP. Vitamin D status in Saudi school children based on knowledge. BMC Pediatr 2015; 15:(1):53.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hussain AN, Alkhenizan AH, El Shaker M, Raef H, Gabr A. Increasing trends and significance of hypovitaminosis D: A population-based study in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arch Osteoporos 2014; 9:(1):190.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gannagé-Yared MH, Chemali R, Yaacoub N, Halaby G. Hypovitaminosis D in a sunny country: Relation to lifestyle and bone markers. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15:(9):1856–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Malaeb D, Hallit S, Salameh P. Assessment of vitamin D levels, awareness among Lebanese pharmacy students, and impact of pharmacist counseling. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2017; 7;:1:55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2016.09.001.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Binkley N, Krueger D, Cowgill CS, Plum L, Lake E, Hansen KE, et al. Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: A call for standardization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89;:7:3152–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Giustina A, Adler RA, Binkley N, Bouillon R, Ebeling PR, Lazaretti-Castro M, et al. Controversies in vitamin D: Summary statement from an international conference. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104;:2:234–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shieh A, Chun RF, Ma C, Witzel S, Meyer B, Rafison B, et al. Effects of high-dose vitamin D2 versus D3 on total and free 25-hydroxyvitamin D and markers of calcium balance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101;:8:3070–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cipriani C, Romagnoli E, Pepe J, Russo S, Carlucci L, Piemonte S, et al. Long-term bioavailability after a single oral or intramuscular administration of 600,000 IU of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol: Implications for treatment and prophylaxis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98;:7:2709–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Romagnoli E, Mascia ML, Cipriani C, Fassino V, Mazzei F, D'Erasmo E, et al. Short and long-term variations in serum calciotropic hormones after a single very large dose of ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) or cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in the elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93;:8:3015–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Trang HM, Cole DEC, Rubin LA, Pierratos A, Siu S, Vieth R. Evidence that vitamin D3 increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D more efficiently than does vitamin D2. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68;:4:854–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehmann U, Hirche F, Stangl GI, Hinz K, Westphal S, Dierkes J. Bioavailability of vitamin D(2) and D(3) in healthy volunteers, a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98;:11:4339–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Holick MF, Biancuzzo RM, Chen TC, Klein EK, Young A, Bibuld D, et al. Vitamin D2 is as effective as vitamin D3 in maintaining circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93;:3:677–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Biancuzzo RM, Young A, Bibuld D, Cai MH, Winter MR, Klein EK, et al. Fortification of orange juice with vitamin D(2) or vitamin D(3) is as effective as an oral supplement in maintaining vitamin D status in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91;:6:1621–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tripkovic L, Lambert H, Hart K, Smith CP, Bucca G, Penson S, et al. Reinhold Vieth and SL-N. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Iberoam 2008; 74;:224:685–701. Available from: http://www.academia.edu/download/31819832/Birkenmaier__Revista_Iberoamericana_2008.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Al-Kuwari MG, Al-Abdulla SA, Abdulla MY, Bakri AH, Mohammed AM, Kandy MC, et al. Epidemiological health assessment in primary healthcare in the State of Qatar- 2019. Qatar Med J 2021; 2021;:3:1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bowman SE. Coordination of SNOMED-CT and ICD-10: Getting the most out of electronic health record systems. Coord SNOMED-CT ICD-10 Get Most out Electron Heal Rec Syst Am Heal Inf Manag Assoc. 2005.
  26. Isaradech N, Khumrin P. Auto-mapping clinical documents to ICD-10 using SNOMED-CT.In: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. American Medical Informatics Association 2021;:2021:296–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kleinbaum DG, Sullivan KM, Barker ND. A pocket guide to epidemiology. Springer Science+Business Media. 2007.
  28. Hammami MM, Yusuf A. Differential effects of vitamin D2 and D3 supplements on 25-hydroxyvitamin D level are dose, sex, and time dependent: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Endocr Disord 2017; 17;:1:12.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Aterrado S, Ono G, Kanehira-Mar S, Meier J, Swislocki A. Evaluating vitamin D repletion regimens and effects in veteran patients. Ann Pharmacother 2015; 49;:9:969–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Biancuzzo RM, Clarke N, Reitz RE, Travison TG, Holick MF. Serum concentrations of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in response to vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98;:3:973–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Heaney RP, Davies KM, Chen TC, Holick MF, Barger-Lux MJ. Human serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77;:1:204–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Whiting SJ, Bonjour JP, Payen FD, Rousseau B. Moderate amounts of vitamin D3 in supplements are effective in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D from low baseline levels in adults: A systematic review. Nutrients 2015; 7;:4:2311–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Holick MF. Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and rickets. J Clin Invest 2006; 116;:8:2062–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Leventis P, Kiely PDW. The tolerability and biochemical effects of high-dose bolus vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation in patients with vitamin D insufficiency. Scand J Rheumatol 2009; 38;:2:149–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Laura T, Helen L, Kathryn H, Colin P, Smith, Giselda B, et al. Elina, Hyppo nen. Jacqueline, Berry. Reinhold, Vieth and SL-N. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Internet]. American Society for Nutrition; 2012. Available from: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/725769/1/ajcn9561357.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Heaney RP, Recker RR, Grote J, Horst RL, Armas LAG. Vitamin D(3) is more potent than vitamin D(2) in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96;:3:E447–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Armas LAG, Hollis BW, Heaney RP. Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89;:11:5387–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Cashman KD, Seamans KM, Lucey AJ, Stöcklin E, Weber P, Kiely M, Hill TR. Relative effectiveness of oral 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and vitamin D3 in raising wintertime serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95;:6:1350–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Baggerly CA, Cuomo RE, French CB, Garland CF, Gorham ED, Grant WB, et al. Sunlight and vitamin D: Necessary for public health. J Am Coll Nutr 2015; 34;:4:359–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Grant WB. An estimate of the global reduction in mortality rates through doubling vitamin D levels. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65;:9:1016–26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2022.35
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2022.35
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): (cholecalciferol)(ergocalciferol),andcare,DD2D3deficiency,healthprimary and vitamin

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed