1887
Volume 2020, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • EISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Increased interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) is one of the major predictors of cardiovascular disease. An IASBPD of >10 mmHg is of clinical significance. However, studies have reported a high number of patients visiting the emergency department (ED) with high IASBPD and varying correlation of IASBPD to age, ethnic background, and comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. The CALIBRATE study aimed to measure the IABPDs in the multiethnic patient population presenting to the ED in Qatar and to assess the distribution of IASBPD in this population. In a sitting position, two consecutive blood pressure (BP) measurements were recorded from the right and left arms for each participant using a calibrated automated machine and appropriate cuff sizes. The data were recorded using predefined data fields, including patient demographics, past medical, and social and family history. The continuous variables were reported as mean or median based on the distribution of data. The data were analyzed using Stata MP 14.0. A total of 1800 patients, with a mean age of 34 (10) years, were prospectively recruited from the ED. The median absolute systolic BP difference (ΔSBP) between the right and left arms was 6 (3–10) mmHg, and it was the same for the first (ΔSBP1) and the second readings (ΔSBP2). The absolute average of ΔSBP1 and ΔSBP2 was 7 (4–10) mmHg. The difference in systolic BP difference (SBP) of < 20 mmHg for interarm blood pressure was seen in the 95th percentile of the population. No meaningful association could be detected between the IABPD and the study variables such as age, demographics, regions of interest, and risk factors. In population presenting to the ED, the IASBPD of at least 20 mmHg reached at the 95th percentile, validating the known significant difference. The utility of SBP difference can be improved further by taking the average of two individual readings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2020.14
2020-05-04
2024-10-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/qmj/2020/1/qmj.2020.14.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2020.14&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dudzinski DM, Prabhakar AM, Ptaszek LM, Vlahakes GJ. Case records of the massachusetts general hospital. Case 19-2015. A 71-year-old man with chest pain and shortness of breath. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2438–2446.
  2. Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Campbell JL. The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344::e1327.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kung SW, Ng WS, Ng MH. Aortic dissection in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007; 13:2:122130.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Meszaros I, Morocz J, Szlavi J, Schmidt J, Tornoci L, Nagy L, et al.  Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection. Chest. 2000; 117:5:12711278.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sullivan PR, Wolfson AB, Leckey RD, Burke JL. Diagnosis of acute thoracic aortic dissection in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2000; 18:1:4650.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Asha SE, Miers JW. A systematic review and meta-analysis of D-dimer as a rule-out test for suspected acute aortic dissection. Ann of Emerg Med. 2015; 66:4:368378.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension: The clinical management of primary hypertension in adults: update of clinical guidelines 18 and 34. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians (UK); 2011,127.
  8. Clark CE, Campbell JL, Evans PH, Millward A. Prevalence and clinical implications of the inter-arm blood pressure difference: a systematic review. J Hum Hypertens. 2006; 20:12:923931.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Aboyans V, Kamineni A, Allison MA, McDermott MM, Crouse JR, Ni H, et al.  The epidemiology of subclavian stenosis and its association with markers of subclinical atherosclerosis: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis. 2010; 211:1:266270.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tokitsu T, Yamamoto E, Hirata Y, Fujisue K, Sugamura K, Maeda H, et al.  Relationship between inter-arm blood pressure differences and future cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease. J Hypertens. 2015; 33:9:17801789.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pathan SA, Bhutta ZA, Moinudheen J, Jenkins D, Silva AD, Sharma Y, et al.  Marginal analysis in assessing factors contributing time to physician in the emergency department using operations data. Qatar Med J. 2017; 2016:2:18.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grossman A, Prokupetz A, Gordon B, Morag-Koren N, Grossman E. Inter-arm blood pressure differences in young, healthy patients. J Clin Hypertens. 2013; 15:8:575578.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Johansson JK, Puukka PJ, Jula AM. Interarm blood pressure difference and target organ damage in the general population. J Hypertens. 2014; 32:2:260266.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Barnett AG, Sans S, Salomaa V, Kuulasmaa K, Dobson AJ. The effect of temperature on systolic blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2007; 12:3:195203.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodrigues SL, Baldo MP, Lani L, Nogueira L, Mill JG. Sa Cunha RD. Body mass index is not independently associated with increased aortic stiffness in a Brazilian population. Am J Hypertens. 2012; 25:10:10641069.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayrovitz HN. Inter-arm systolic blood pressure dependence on hand dominance. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2019; 39:1:3541.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Ukoumunne OC, Campbell JL. Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012; 379:9819:905914.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Weinberg I, Gona P, O'Donnell CJ, Jaff MR, Murabito JM. The systolic blood pressure difference between arms and cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Med. 2014; 127:3:209215.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hosme DW,Lemeshow S,Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression.Third edition:Hoboken, New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haukoos JS,Lewis RJ.Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with “difficult” distributions.Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:(4):360365.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Singer AJ,HollanderJE. Blood pressure: assessment of interarm differences.Arch Intern Med.1996; 156:(17):20052008.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wietlisbach V,Rickenbach M,Burnand B,Hausser D,Gutzwiller F. Combining repeated blood pressure measurements to obtain prevalences of high blood pressure.Acta Med Scand. 1988;224:(S728):165168.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kristensen BO,Kornerup HJ. Which arm to measure the blood pressure?Acta Med Scand. 1982;212:(S670):6973.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sharma B,Ramawat P. Prevalence of inter-arm blood pressure difference among clinical out-patients.Int J Health Sci (Qassim).2016; 10:(2):229237.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Clark CE,Campbell JL,Powell RJ. The interarm blood pressure difference as predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension in primary care: cohort study.J Hum Hypertens.2007; 21:(8):633638.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fotherby MD,Panayiotou B,Potter JF. Age-related differences in simultaneous interarm blood pressure measurements.Postgrad Med J.1993; 69:(809):194196.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Van der Hoeven NV,Lodestijn S,Nanninga S,van Montfrans GA,van den Born BJ. Simultaneous compared with sequential blood pressure measurement results in smaller inter-arm blood pressure differences.J Clin Hypertens.2013; 15:(11):839844.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sheng CS,Liu M,Zeng WF,Huang QF,Li Y, Wang JG. Four-limb blood pressure as predictors of mortality in elderly Chinese.Hypertension.2013; 61:(6):11551160.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2020.14
Loading
/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2020.14
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Emergency DepartmentHypertensionIASBPDInterarm systolic blood pressure difference and Qatar
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error