1887
Volume 2003, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0253-8253
  • E-ISSN: 2227-0426

Abstract

Objective: Hydrocephalus is a common condition seen in the neurosurgical practice that usually requires insertion of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt. It is commonly seen in our country for possible several reasons; some of them are the prohibition of abortion and increased consanguinity marriages. In this study, the authors retrospectively analyzed 124 hydrocephalic patients operated upon at our institute for three years period. Our aim is to verify the extent of the problem in our community, addressed some facts and to improve our services.

Methods: Between January 1999 and December 2001, 124 patients with hydrocephalus underwent CSF shunt operations (insertions and revisions) at King Fahd Hospital of the University were retrospectively analyzed to assess the etiology, clinical presentation, management and outcome.

Results: In this study, 124patients were analyzed. 244 operations were performed. 96patients (72.4%) had congenital hydrocephalus, 24 patients (20%) had associated cranial anomalies, 32 patients (25%), their parents were relatives. 70 patients (56%) had noticeable mental retardation. Shunt malfunction reported in 71 patients (57%) and the infection rate was 8% (10 patients).

Conclusion: The higher incidence of hydrocephalus between Saudi population possibly due to consanguinity marriages and prohibition of abortion. Premarital counseling and people orientation about this problem might help to reduce the number of cases. Shunt infection and malfunction are still the main complications of shunting. There is possibility of reducing the complication's rate if a special protocol is advocated and strictly followed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2003.2.19
2003-12-01
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1. Obeid   F. . Review of hydrocephalus treated by ventriculoperitoneal shunt and role of local Vancomycin injection in treatment of shunt infection. . Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery . 1997; ;1: 1 : 54– 57 .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. Sood   S., , Ham   S., , Canady   A. . Current Treatment of Hydrocephalus. . Neurosurgery Quarterly . 2001; ;11: 1 : 36– 49 .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. Baytem   R:. . Infection associated with CSF shunt for hydrocephalus. . Minervapediatrics . 1992; ;44: : 43– 51 .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. Emergency Medicine Clinic of North America (Neurologic Emergencies); 1987. p. 709-716 .
  5. 5. Murshid   WB., , Jarallah   JS., , Dad   MI. . Epidemiology of infantile hydrocephalus in Saudi Arabia: birth prevalence and associated factors. . Pediatr Neuro surg . 2000; ;32: 3 : 119– 123 .
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. El Awad   ME. . Infantile hydrocephalus in the south-western region of Saudi Arabia. . Ann Trop Pediatr . 1992; ;12: 3 : 335– 338 .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. Kulkarni   A., , Drake   JM., , Pasculli   M. . Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: A prospective study of risk factors. . J. Neurosurg . 2001; ;94: : 195– 201 .
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. Chadduck   W., , Adametz   J. . Incidence of seizures in patients with myelomeningocele: a multifactorial analysis. . Surg Neurol . 1998; ;30: : 281– 285 .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. Drake   JM., , Kulkarni   AV. . Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections. . Neurosurg Q . 1993; ;3: : 283– 294 .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. Kontny   U., , Hofling   B., , Gutjahr   P. , et al. , CSF shunt infections in children. . Infection . 1993; ;21: : 89– 92 .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. McLone   DG., , Czyzewski   D., , Raimondi   AJ. , et al. , Central nervous system infections as a limiting factor in the intelligence of children with myelomeningocele. . Pediatrics . 1982; ;70: : 338– 342 .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. Ronan   A., , Hogg   GG., , Klug   GI:. . Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections in children. . Pediatr Infect Dis J . 1995; ;14: : 782– 786 .
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. Schiff   SJ., , Oakes   WJ. . Delayed cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection in children. . Pediatr Neurosci . 1989; ;15: : 131– 135 .
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. James   HE., , Walsh   JW., , Wilson   HE. , et al. , Prospective randomized study of therapy in cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. . Neurosurg . 1980; ;7: : 459– 463 .
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. Walters   BC., , Hoffman   HJ., , Hendrick   EB. , et al. , Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. Influences on initial management and subsequent outcome. . J Neurosurg . 1984; ;60: : 1014– 1021 .
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/qmj.2003.2.19
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Hydrocephalus , Infection , Malfunction and Shunt
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error