1887
Volume 2013, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1703-1958

Abstract

Qatar is in the midst of a massive systematic reform designed to convert its schools and Ministry of Education into a world-class competitive educational system according to . Influenced by neoliberalism as a dominant ideology that treats education as just another service to be bought and sold on the market, Qatar is one of the most active importers of foreign education providers in the world and this adoption or borrowing of educational methods has drastically shaped the educational landscape in therein. Neoliberalism and the adoption of educational methods or strategies have influenced teacher licensing, curriculum, professional development and daily classroom instruction. One expanse of the educational system that has received little attention is the preschool classroom. This paper reports the findings from nonparticipant observations of preschool classrooms in the England and Qatar, followed by personal reflections and experiences regarding Qatari preschool education. The purpose of the study is to examine the policies and practices in the Qatari preschool system and to determine to what degree preschool pedagogical practices are similar to those practices found in England. The analysis illustrates that there are some teaching methods and pedagogical polices that reflect the British system, but teachers in Qatar still require additional professional development in order to adapt and utilize these pedagogical strategies and policies to better meet the Qatari context.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/nmejre.2013.2
2013-08-01
2019-07-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nmejre/2013/1/nmejre.2013.2.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/nmejre.2013.2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. [1]. Brewer   DJ., , Augustine   CH., , Zellman   GL., , Ryan   GW., , Goldman   CA., , Stasz   C., , Constant   L. . 2007. Education for a New Era: Design and Implementation of K-12 Education Reform in Qatar . Santa Monica, CA: : Rand Corp; . http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG548/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]. Supreme Education Council. Evaluation Institute. (2011a); http://www.english.education.gov.qa/section/sec/evaluationinstitute
  3. [4]. ACEI Global Guidelines Assessment 3rd Edition (2011). http://acei.org/programs-events/global-guidelines.html
  4. [5]. Supreme Education Council (SEC) . The Early Childhood Good Practices . Doha, Qatar: : SEC;   2009; ;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [6]. Becker   RF. . International Branch Campuses: Markets and Strategies . London: : Observatory for Higher Education;   2009; ;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [7]. Cherif   M., , Romanowski   MH., , Nasser   R. . All that glitters is not gold: challenges of teacher and school leader licensing system in a GCC country. . Int J Edu Dev . 2011; ;32: : 471– 481
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [8]. Kwon   YI. . Changing curriculum for early childhood education in England. . Early Child Res Pract . 2002; ;4: 2 . http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n2/kwon.html
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [9]. SEC, 2007
  9. [10]. Supreme Education Council (SEC) . Education for a New Era . Doha, Qatar: : SEC;   2005; ;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. [11]. Zheng   J. . Neoliberal globalization, higher education policies and international student flows: an exploratory case study of Chinese graduate student flows to Canada. . J Altern Perspect Soc Sci . 2010; ;2: 1 : 216– 244
    [Google Scholar]
  11. [12]. Devos   A. . Academic standards, internationalization and the discursive construction of the international student. . Higher Edu Res Dev . 2003; ;22: 2 : 155– 166
    [Google Scholar]
  12. [13]. Robertson   S., , Bonal   X., , Dale   R. . GATS and the education service industry. . 2002; ;46: 4 : 472– 496
    [Google Scholar]
  13. [14]. Halpin   D., , Troyna   B. . The politics of education policy borrowing. . Comp Edu . 1995; ;31: : 303– 310
    [Google Scholar]
  14. [15]. Steiner-Khamsi & Quist 2000
  15. [16]. Carnoy   DM. . Globalization and Educational Reform: What Planners Need to Know . Paris: : UNESCO;   1999; ;
    [Google Scholar]
  16. [17]. McGinn   NF. . Education, democratization, and globalization: A challenge for comparative education. . Comp Edu Rev . 1996; ;40: 4 : 341– 357
    [Google Scholar]
  17. [18]. Sperandio   J., , Hobson   D., , Douglas   R., , Pruitt   R. . Does context matter? Importing US educational programs to schools overseas. . Compare A J Comp Int Edu . 2009; ;39: 6 : 701– 721
    [Google Scholar]
  18. [19]. Steiner-Khamsi   G. , ed. Lessons from Elsewhere: The Politics of Educational Borrowing & Lending . New York: : Teachers College Press;   2004; ;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. [20]. Suarez-Orozco   M., Qin-Hilliard   DB. , eds. Globalization: Culture and Education in the New Millennium . Los Angeles, CA: : University of California;   2004; ;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. [21]. Dimmock   C., , Walker   A. . Developing comparative and international and management: a cross-cultural model. . School Leadersh Manag . 2000; ;20: 2 : 143– 160
    [Google Scholar]
  21. [22]. Cooper   J., , Lewis   R., , Urquhart   C. . Using participant or non-participant observation to determine information behaviour. . 2004; ; : 1– 15
    [Google Scholar]
  22. [23]. Handley   K. . Entry for “non-participant observation”. . In: Thorpe   R., Holt   R. , eds. The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research . London: : Sage;   2008; ; : 142– 144 . ISBN 13-978-1412935289
    [Google Scholar]
  23. [24]. Fitzpatrick   R., , Boulton   M. . Qualitative methods for assessing health care. . Qual Health Care . 1994; ;3: 2 : 107– 113 . http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid  1055206&tool  pmcentrez&rendertype  abstract
    [Google Scholar]
  24. [25]. Mruck   K. . Qualitative research networking: FQS as an example [16 paragraphs]. . Forum Qual Soc Res (Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung) . 2000; ;1: 3 . http://nbnresolvingde/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0003346
    [Google Scholar]
  25. [26]. Nadig   M. . Transculturality in process: theoretical and methodological aspects drawn from cultural studies and psychoanalysis. . In: Sandkühler   Hans Jörg., Lim   Hong-Bin. , eds. Transculturality, Epistemology, Ethics, and Politics . Frankfurt, Germany: : Lang;   2004; ; : 9– 21
    [Google Scholar]
  26. [27]. HighScope. Curriculum: Preschool; 2013. http://www.highscope.org/Content.asp?ContentId  63
  27. [28]. Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) . Inspection Report: Manorfield Primary and Nursery School . 26 June 2007 [Online] . London: : Author; 2007; . http://www.ofsted.gov.uk. Available [2011, December 1]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. [29]. Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) . OFSTED's Nursery Education [Online] . London: : Author;   2007.; ;   http://www.ofsted.gov.uk.   Available [2011, December 1]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. [30]. Supreme Education Council. Above 30 % teachers not qualified . Available from   http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/qatar/163929-above-30pc-teachers-not-qualified.html
  30. [31]. Giroux   HA., , McLaren   P. . Teacher education and the politics of engagement: the case for democratic schooling. . In: Leistyna   Pepi., Woodrum   Arlie., Sherblom   Stephen A. , eds. Breaking Free: The Transformative Power of Critical Pedagogy . Cambridge, MA: : Harvard Educational Review;   1996; ; : 301– 331
    [Google Scholar]
  31. [32]. Lane   J. . Culture, ethnicity, language, faith, and equal respect in early childhood education—Does getting it matter?.   Edu Rev . 2007; ;20: 1 : 101– 107
    [Google Scholar]
  32. [33]. Nind   M., , Flewitt   R., , Payler   J. . The social experience of early childhood for children with learning disabilities: inclusion, competence, and agency. . Br J Soc Edu . 2010; ;31: 6 : 653– 670
    [Google Scholar]
  33. [34]. Knight   J. . What can we do about teacher resistance?.   Phi Delta Kappan . 2009; ;90: 7 : 508– 513
    [Google Scholar]
  34. [35]. Bowman   M. . Using video in research. . Spotlights: The Scottish Council for Research in Education . 1994; ;45: : 1– 3
    [Google Scholar]
  35. [36]. Docking   J. , ed. New Labour's Policies for Schools . London: : David Fulton Publishers;   2000; ;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/nmejre.2013.2
Loading

Supplementary File 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error