Abstract
Background: Emergency thoracotomy is a potentially life-saving maneuver for trauma patients in extremis. Since trauma scenarios, in rural locations, usually occur with a high incidence of a severe injury that leads to hemorrhagic shock or cardiopulmonary arrest. The objective of this study was to analyze the experience in emergency thoracotomy performed by a general surgeon in a rural area in Thailand. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted by analyzing the patient records including demographics, mechanisms of injuries, specific organ injury, surgical approach, life-saving surgical procedure, and postoperative outcome for all patients who underwent emergency thoracotomy in the Department of Surgery, Srinakharinwirot University hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. Results: Twelve patients underwent emergency thoracotomy within 1 hour after arrival and were equally divided between blunt and penetrating injuries with 6 (50%). A mean patient age of 34.8 ± 15.2 years (range 16–55), mean systolic blood pressure on arrival was 65.8 ± 35.2 mmHg (range 0–100 mmHg), and the mean injury severity score (ISS) was 54.6 ± 25.2 (range 26–75). Profound hemorrhagic shock is a major indication for emergency thoracotomy. The overall survival rate was 41.7% (5/12 patients) without survivors from cardiac injuries. Four patients (66.7%) in the penetrating and 1 patient (16.7%) in the blunt intrathoracic injury group were survived and discharged from the hospital. Conclusion: Emergency thoracotomy offers a chance for survival at 41.7% for trauma patients who present with extremes in this study. Rapid decision-making, good operative technique, and adequate patient selection are crucial for reasonable outcomes.
© 2022 Tullavardhana, licensee HBKU Press.
Article metrics loading...
/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2022.7
2022-01-20
2024-03-28
Full text loading...
/deliver/fulltext/jemtac/2022/2/jemtac.2022.7.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2022.7&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
References
-
Edens JW, Beekley AC, Chung KK, et al. Longterm outcomes after combat casualty emergency department thoracotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209:(2):188–197.
[Google Scholar]
-
Seamon MJ, Haut ER, Van Arendonk K, et al. An evidence-based approach to patient selection for emergency department thoracotomy: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 79:(1):159–173.
[Google Scholar]
-
Lorenz HP, Steinmetz B, Lieberman J, Schecoter WP, Macho JR. Emergency thoracotomy: survival correlates with physiologic status. J Trauma. 1992; 32:(6):780–5.
[Google Scholar]
-
Rhee PM, Acosta J, Bridgeman A, Wang D, Jordan M, Rich N. Survival after emergency department thoracotomy: review of published data from the past 25 years. J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 190:(3):288–298.
[Google Scholar]
-
Refaely Y, Koyfman L, Friger M, et al. Clinical Outcome of Urgent Thoracotomy in Patients with Penetrating and Blunt Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Survey. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 66:(8):686–692.
[Google Scholar]
-
Duchesne JC, Hunt JP, Marr AB. M. Rural Trauma. In: Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, Moore EE. Editors. Trauma. 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2021: 171–188.
[Google Scholar]
-
Dickson RL, Gleisberg G, Aiken M, et al. Emergency Medical Services Simple Thoracostomy for Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Postimplementation Experience in a Ground-based Suburban/Rural Emergency Medical Services Agency. J Emerg Med. 2018; 55:(3):366–371.
[Google Scholar]
-
Chadbunchachai W, Suphanchaimaj W, Settasatien A, Jinwong T. Road traffic injuries in Thailand: current situation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012; 95: Suppl 7:S274–S281.
[Google Scholar]
-
[Google Scholar]
-
Mancini A, Bonne A, Pirvu A, et al. Retrospective study of thoracotomy performed in a French level 1-trauma center. J Visc Surg. 2017; 154:(6):401–406.
[Google Scholar]
-
Flaris AN, Simms ER, Prat N, Reynard F, Caillot JL, Voiglio EJ. Clamshell incision versus left anterolateral thoracotomy. Which one is faster when performing a resuscitative thoracotomy? The tortoise and the hare revisited. World J Surg. 2015; 39:(5):1306–1311.
[Google Scholar]
-
Newberry R, Brown D, Mitchell T, et al. Prospective Randomized Trial of Standard Left Anterolateral Thoracotomy Versus Modified Bilateral Clamshell Thoracotomy Performed by Emergency Physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 77:(3):317–326.
[Google Scholar]
-
Flaris AN, Simms ER, Prat N, Reynard F, Caillot JL, Voiglio EJ. Clamshell incision versus left anterolateral thoracotomy. Which one is faster when performing a resuscitative thoracotomy? The tortoise and the hare revisited. World J Surg. 2015; 39:(5):1306–1311.
[Google Scholar]
-
Newberry R, Brown D, Mitchell T, et al. Prospective Randomized Trial of Standard Left Anterolateral Thoracotomy Versus Modified Bilateral Clamshell Thoracotomy Performed by Emergency Physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 77:(3):317–326.
[Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/jemtac.2022.7