1887
Volume 2013, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2223-859X
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Abstract

This work analyses the reforms carried out in some of the Muslim states regarding the issue of triple divorce in one session. According to a majority of Sunni jurists, pronouncing the word “” three times in succession, equates with three “ On the contrary, according to Ibn Taimiyah, Ibn al-Qayyim, and the Shi‘a Imamiyah, three pronouncements of the word in one session equals only one . Most Arab, as well as many Muslim states such as Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Sudan, Morocco, Kuwait, Yemen, Afghanistan, Libya, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates, have, while formulating their own laws, followed Ibn Taimiyah's and Ibn al-Qayyim's positions on this issue. In this regard, Sri Lanka's Marriage and Divorce (Muslim) Act, 1951, as amended up to 2006, seems to be the most ideal legislation on triple . In Pakistan, the Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961, has abolished triple , as the procedure laid down in section 7 is largely applicable to one or two pronouncements only and excludes three pronouncements. Furthermore, some portions of section 7 are in clear contravention of the dictates of Islamic law, which adds to this precarious section's peculiarity. The superior courts in Pakistan and Bangladesh have not been consistent in interpreting the law on this important subject, while on the other hand, some Indian High Courts have treated triple as invalid.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5339/irl.2013.2
2013-07-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/irl/2013/1/irl.2013.2.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5339/irl.2013.2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5339/irl.2013.2
Loading

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error